Cargando…
EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates
BACKGROUND: To compare the late toxicity rates after two different high dose rate (HDR) adjuvant intravaginal interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) dose schedules in stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS: Stage I-II patients with endometrial cancer treated with surgery (with or without ly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01455-y |
_version_ | 1784677414584975360 |
---|---|
author | Lancellotta, Valentina Macchia, Gabriella Dinapoli, Nicola Autorino, Rosa Campitelli, Maura Nardangeli, Alessia Salvati, Alessandra Fionda, Bruno Casà, Calogero Cornacchione, Patrizia Rovirosa, Angeles Kovács, György Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Tagliaferri, Luca |
author_facet | Lancellotta, Valentina Macchia, Gabriella Dinapoli, Nicola Autorino, Rosa Campitelli, Maura Nardangeli, Alessia Salvati, Alessandra Fionda, Bruno Casà, Calogero Cornacchione, Patrizia Rovirosa, Angeles Kovács, György Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Tagliaferri, Luca |
author_sort | Lancellotta, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the late toxicity rates after two different high dose rate (HDR) adjuvant intravaginal interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) dose schedules in stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS: Stage I-II patients with endometrial cancer treated with surgery (with or without lymphadenectomy) and adjuvant HDR-IRT between 2014 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients were treated with two schedules. In the first cohort (C1), 21 Gy were delivered in three weekly fractions (7 Gy) prescribed 0.5 cm from the applicator surface. In the second cohort (C2), 24 Gy were delivered in four weekly fractions (6 Gy). The clinical target volume was the upper third of the vagina for C1 and the upper 3 cm for C2. HDR-IRT technique and point prescription (5 mm depth from the applicator surface) were the same for all patients. Vaginal toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE 5.0 scale in terms of the presence versus absence of any toxicity grade. The correlation among toxicity and clinical covariates (age, lymphadenectomy, fractionation, stage) was tested by Pearson correlation test (univariate) and by logistic regression (multivariable). RESULTS: 114 stage I and three stage II patients, median age 62 (range: 32–85) years, were included in this analysis. The mean follow-up was 56.3 months in C1 (40–76) and 20 months in C2 (8–42). Vaginal late toxicity was recorded in 40 and 15 patients in C1 and 2, respectively. Age, lymphadenectomy, and fractionation were significantly correlated with toxicity at univariate analysis (p value = 0.029, 0.006, and 0.002, respectively), while stepwise logistic regression confirmed only age and fractionation as significantly correlated parameters (p value = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). Three-year local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free and cause-specific survival rates were 96.6%, 94.8%, and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed lower vaginal late toxicity rate in C2 compared to C1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8960610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89606102022-04-07 EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates Lancellotta, Valentina Macchia, Gabriella Dinapoli, Nicola Autorino, Rosa Campitelli, Maura Nardangeli, Alessia Salvati, Alessandra Fionda, Bruno Casà, Calogero Cornacchione, Patrizia Rovirosa, Angeles Kovács, György Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Tagliaferri, Luca Radiol Med Radiotherapy BACKGROUND: To compare the late toxicity rates after two different high dose rate (HDR) adjuvant intravaginal interventional radiotherapy (IRT-brachytherapy) dose schedules in stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS: Stage I-II patients with endometrial cancer treated with surgery (with or without lymphadenectomy) and adjuvant HDR-IRT between 2014 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Patients were treated with two schedules. In the first cohort (C1), 21 Gy were delivered in three weekly fractions (7 Gy) prescribed 0.5 cm from the applicator surface. In the second cohort (C2), 24 Gy were delivered in four weekly fractions (6 Gy). The clinical target volume was the upper third of the vagina for C1 and the upper 3 cm for C2. HDR-IRT technique and point prescription (5 mm depth from the applicator surface) were the same for all patients. Vaginal toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE 5.0 scale in terms of the presence versus absence of any toxicity grade. The correlation among toxicity and clinical covariates (age, lymphadenectomy, fractionation, stage) was tested by Pearson correlation test (univariate) and by logistic regression (multivariable). RESULTS: 114 stage I and three stage II patients, median age 62 (range: 32–85) years, were included in this analysis. The mean follow-up was 56.3 months in C1 (40–76) and 20 months in C2 (8–42). Vaginal late toxicity was recorded in 40 and 15 patients in C1 and 2, respectively. Age, lymphadenectomy, and fractionation were significantly correlated with toxicity at univariate analysis (p value = 0.029, 0.006, and 0.002, respectively), while stepwise logistic regression confirmed only age and fractionation as significantly correlated parameters (p value = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). Three-year local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free and cause-specific survival rates were 96.6%, 94.8%, and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed lower vaginal late toxicity rate in C2 compared to C1. Springer Milan 2022-01-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8960610/ /pubmed/35092552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01455-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Radiotherapy Lancellotta, Valentina Macchia, Gabriella Dinapoli, Nicola Autorino, Rosa Campitelli, Maura Nardangeli, Alessia Salvati, Alessandra Fionda, Bruno Casà, Calogero Cornacchione, Patrizia Rovirosa, Angeles Kovács, György Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta Tagliaferri, Luca EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title | EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title_full | EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title_fullStr | EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title_full_unstemmed | EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title_short | EROS 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
title_sort | eros 2.0 study: evaluation of two interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) schedules for endometrial cancer: a comparison of late vaginal toxicity rates |
topic | Radiotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01455-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lancellottavalentina eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT macchiagabriella eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT dinapolinicola eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT autorinorosa eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT campitellimaura eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT nardangelialessia eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT salvatialessandra eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT fiondabruno eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT casacalogero eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT cornacchionepatrizia eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT rovirosaangeles eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT kovacsgyorgy eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT morgantialessiogiuseppe eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT ferrandinamariagabriella eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT gambacortamariaantonietta eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates AT tagliaferriluca eros20studyevaluationoftwointerventionalradiotherapybrachytherapyschedulesforendometrialcanceracomparisonoflatevaginaltoxicityrates |