Cargando…

Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of CRC survivorship issues and their impact on survivors’ quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This study utilised a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. Adult CRC survivors between 6- and 60-months post-diagnosis (n = 304) were purposively recru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drury, Amanda, Payne, Sheila, Brady, Anne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02975-2
_version_ 1784677418451075072
author Drury, Amanda
Payne, Sheila
Brady, Anne-Marie
author_facet Drury, Amanda
Payne, Sheila
Brady, Anne-Marie
author_sort Drury, Amanda
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of CRC survivorship issues and their impact on survivors’ quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This study utilised a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. Adult CRC survivors between 6- and 60-months post-diagnosis (n = 304) were purposively recruited from three hospitals and twenty-one cancer support centres in Ireland. QoL was evaluated using the EuroQol and FACT-C questionnaires and results compared to population norms. 22 survey participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring the impact of survivorship issues on their daily lives. RESULTS: While CRC survivors reported QoL outcomes comparable to or better than normative populations, 54% were dissatisfied with their QoL. The most common survivorship issues reported included negative body image (74%), fatigue (68%), sexual dysfunction (66%) and sleep disturbance (59%). Thematic analysis of the qualitative data illustrated survivors’ attempts to live with the impact of cancer and its treatment (loss, fear, impact) and striving to contextualise, reframe and understand the consequences of cancer and its treatment (control, vigilance, benefit). Within these themes, the cross-domain impact of less prevalent symptoms including bowel dysfunction (28–57%) and peripheral neuropathy (47%) were widely discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer survivors report positive QoL outcomes, many experience distressing physical, psychological and social effects. The findings suggest less common and difficult to manage symptoms are the greatest source of distress and unmet need. Support and information must be tailored to address survivors’ individual needs and preferences for support, informed by holistic person-centred assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02975-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8960628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89606282022-04-07 Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer Drury, Amanda Payne, Sheila Brady, Anne-Marie Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the prevalence of CRC survivorship issues and their impact on survivors’ quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This study utilised a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. Adult CRC survivors between 6- and 60-months post-diagnosis (n = 304) were purposively recruited from three hospitals and twenty-one cancer support centres in Ireland. QoL was evaluated using the EuroQol and FACT-C questionnaires and results compared to population norms. 22 survey participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring the impact of survivorship issues on their daily lives. RESULTS: While CRC survivors reported QoL outcomes comparable to or better than normative populations, 54% were dissatisfied with their QoL. The most common survivorship issues reported included negative body image (74%), fatigue (68%), sexual dysfunction (66%) and sleep disturbance (59%). Thematic analysis of the qualitative data illustrated survivors’ attempts to live with the impact of cancer and its treatment (loss, fear, impact) and striving to contextualise, reframe and understand the consequences of cancer and its treatment (control, vigilance, benefit). Within these themes, the cross-domain impact of less prevalent symptoms including bowel dysfunction (28–57%) and peripheral neuropathy (47%) were widely discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer survivors report positive QoL outcomes, many experience distressing physical, psychological and social effects. The findings suggest less common and difficult to manage symptoms are the greatest source of distress and unmet need. Support and information must be tailored to address survivors’ individual needs and preferences for support, informed by holistic person-centred assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02975-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8960628/ /pubmed/34417713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02975-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Drury, Amanda
Payne, Sheila
Brady, Anne-Marie
Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title_full Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title_short Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
title_sort prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02975-2
work_keys_str_mv AT druryamanda prevalencevsimpactamixedmethodsstudyofsurvivorshipissuesincolorectalcancer
AT paynesheila prevalencevsimpactamixedmethodsstudyofsurvivorshipissuesincolorectalcancer
AT bradyannemarie prevalencevsimpactamixedmethodsstudyofsurvivorshipissuesincolorectalcancer