Cargando…

The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography

PURPOSE: We investigated whether the additional use of grey-scale inversion technique improves the interpretation of eight chest abnormalities, in terms of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 507 patients who underwent a chest computed tomography (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia, Silva, Mario, McMichael, Nicole, Sartorio, Carlotta, Branchi, Cristina, Milanese, Gianluca, Nayak, Sundeep M., Sverzellati, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0
_version_ 1784677418935517184
author Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia
Silva, Mario
McMichael, Nicole
Sartorio, Carlotta
Branchi, Cristina
Milanese, Gianluca
Nayak, Sundeep M.
Sverzellati, Nicola
author_facet Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia
Silva, Mario
McMichael, Nicole
Sartorio, Carlotta
Branchi, Cristina
Milanese, Gianluca
Nayak, Sundeep M.
Sverzellati, Nicola
author_sort Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We investigated whether the additional use of grey-scale inversion technique improves the interpretation of eight chest abnormalities, in terms of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 507 patients who underwent a chest computed tomography (CT) examination and a chest radiography (CXR) within 24 h were enrolled. CT was the standard of reference. Images were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of atelectasis, consolidation, interstitial abnormality, nodule, mass, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and rib fractures. Four CXR reading settings, involving 3 readers were organized: only standard; only inverted; standard followed by inverted; and inverted followed by standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy, assessed with the area under the curve (AUC), and their 95% confidence interval were calculated for each reader and setting. Interobserver agreement was tested by Cohen’s K test with quadratic weights (K(w)) and its 95%CI. RESULTS: CXR sensitivity % for any finding was 35.1 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 1, 35.9 (95% CI: 33 to 37), for setting 2, 32.59 (95% CI: 30 to 34) for setting 3, and 35.56 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 4; specificity % 93.78 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 93.92 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 94.43 (95% CI: 92 to 96), 93.86 (95% CI: 91 to 95); PPV % 56.22 (95% CI: 54.2 to 58.2), 56.49 (95% CI: 54.5 to 58.5), 57.15 (95% CI: 55 to 59), 56.75 (95% CI: 54 to 58); NPV % 85.66 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.74 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.29 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.73 (95% CI: 83 to 87); AUC values 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67); K(w) values 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.40 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.42), 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.43) for settings 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant advantages were observed in the use of grey-scale inversion technique neither over standard display mode nor in combination at the detection of eight chest abnormalities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8960630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89606302022-04-07 The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia Silva, Mario McMichael, Nicole Sartorio, Carlotta Branchi, Cristina Milanese, Gianluca Nayak, Sundeep M. Sverzellati, Nicola Radiol Med Chest Radiology PURPOSE: We investigated whether the additional use of grey-scale inversion technique improves the interpretation of eight chest abnormalities, in terms of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 507 patients who underwent a chest computed tomography (CT) examination and a chest radiography (CXR) within 24 h were enrolled. CT was the standard of reference. Images were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of atelectasis, consolidation, interstitial abnormality, nodule, mass, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and rib fractures. Four CXR reading settings, involving 3 readers were organized: only standard; only inverted; standard followed by inverted; and inverted followed by standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy, assessed with the area under the curve (AUC), and their 95% confidence interval were calculated for each reader and setting. Interobserver agreement was tested by Cohen’s K test with quadratic weights (K(w)) and its 95%CI. RESULTS: CXR sensitivity % for any finding was 35.1 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 1, 35.9 (95% CI: 33 to 37), for setting 2, 32.59 (95% CI: 30 to 34) for setting 3, and 35.56 (95% CI: 33 to 37) for setting 4; specificity % 93.78 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 93.92 (95% CI: 91 to 95), 94.43 (95% CI: 92 to 96), 93.86 (95% CI: 91 to 95); PPV % 56.22 (95% CI: 54.2 to 58.2), 56.49 (95% CI: 54.5 to 58.5), 57.15 (95% CI: 55 to 59), 56.75 (95% CI: 54 to 58); NPV % 85.66 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.74 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.29 (95% CI: 83 to 87), 85.73 (95% CI: 83 to 87); AUC values 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.66), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.67); K(w) values 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.40 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.42), 0.42 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.44), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.43) for settings 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant advantages were observed in the use of grey-scale inversion technique neither over standard display mode nor in combination at the detection of eight chest abnormalities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0. Springer Milan 2022-01-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8960630/ /pubmed/35041136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Chest Radiology
Ledda, Roberta Eufrasia
Silva, Mario
McMichael, Nicole
Sartorio, Carlotta
Branchi, Cristina
Milanese, Gianluca
Nayak, Sundeep M.
Sverzellati, Nicola
The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title_full The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title_fullStr The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title_short The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
title_sort diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography
topic Chest Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01453-0
work_keys_str_mv AT leddarobertaeufrasia thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT silvamario thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT mcmichaelnicole thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT sartoriocarlotta thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT branchicristina thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT milanesegianluca thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT nayaksundeepm thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT sverzellatinicola thediagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT leddarobertaeufrasia diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT silvamario diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT mcmichaelnicole diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT sartoriocarlotta diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT branchicristina diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT milanesegianluca diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT nayaksundeepm diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography
AT sverzellatinicola diagnosticvalueofgreyscaleinversiontechniqueinchestradiography