Cargando…
What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines
Purpose Students in higher education are a diverse group comprising people with different backgrounds and abilities. Regulations require that digital learning materials and platforms employed in higher education accommodate this diversity. Furthermore, they require faculty members to have an underst...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35370532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00875-x |
_version_ | 1784677522565234688 |
---|---|
author | Sanderson, Norun Christine Kessel, Siri Chen, Weiqin |
author_facet | Sanderson, Norun Christine Kessel, Siri Chen, Weiqin |
author_sort | Sanderson, Norun Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose Students in higher education are a diverse group comprising people with different backgrounds and abilities. Regulations require that digital learning materials and platforms employed in higher education accommodate this diversity. Furthermore, they require faculty members to have an understanding of universal design and digital accessibility, as well as practical knowledge of how to make learning materials and courses accessible for more students. The goal of this research is to gain insight into the status of such knowledge among faculty members. Methods The research presented in this paper involved a qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 faculty members employed in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Norway and Poland. The participants worked in the computer science and engineering disciplines. The data was analysed using thematic analysis, and two main themes and six sub-themes were identified. Results We found that most participants lack sufficient understanding of digital barriers and assistive technologies. Very few were aware of legislation and guidelines related to universal design. Most importantly, the majority lack practical knowledge on how to make digital learning materials and courses accessible. Furthermore, the solutions they propose for addressing the barriers are intuitive and only encompass barriers that are easy to recognise and identify. Conclusion The findings indicate that there is a gap between legislation and implementation in practice when it comes to making digital learning materials accessible in higher education. The lack of knowledge among faculty members shows that training is necessary to increase understanding and practical knowledge, and HEIs should prioritise this in strategies and action plans going forward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8961093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89610932022-03-29 What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines Sanderson, Norun Christine Kessel, Siri Chen, Weiqin Univers Access Inf Soc Long Paper Purpose Students in higher education are a diverse group comprising people with different backgrounds and abilities. Regulations require that digital learning materials and platforms employed in higher education accommodate this diversity. Furthermore, they require faculty members to have an understanding of universal design and digital accessibility, as well as practical knowledge of how to make learning materials and courses accessible for more students. The goal of this research is to gain insight into the status of such knowledge among faculty members. Methods The research presented in this paper involved a qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 faculty members employed in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Norway and Poland. The participants worked in the computer science and engineering disciplines. The data was analysed using thematic analysis, and two main themes and six sub-themes were identified. Results We found that most participants lack sufficient understanding of digital barriers and assistive technologies. Very few were aware of legislation and guidelines related to universal design. Most importantly, the majority lack practical knowledge on how to make digital learning materials and courses accessible. Furthermore, the solutions they propose for addressing the barriers are intuitive and only encompass barriers that are easy to recognise and identify. Conclusion The findings indicate that there is a gap between legislation and implementation in practice when it comes to making digital learning materials accessible in higher education. The lack of knowledge among faculty members shows that training is necessary to increase understanding and practical knowledge, and HEIs should prioritise this in strategies and action plans going forward. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8961093/ /pubmed/35370532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00875-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Long Paper Sanderson, Norun Christine Kessel, Siri Chen, Weiqin What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title | What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title_full | What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title_fullStr | What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title_full_unstemmed | What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title_short | What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
title_sort | what do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? a qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines |
topic | Long Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35370532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00875-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersonnorunchristine whatdofacultymembersknowaboutuniversaldesignanddigitalaccessibilityaqualitativestudyincomputerscienceandengineeringdisciplines AT kesselsiri whatdofacultymembersknowaboutuniversaldesignanddigitalaccessibilityaqualitativestudyincomputerscienceandengineeringdisciplines AT chenweiqin whatdofacultymembersknowaboutuniversaldesignanddigitalaccessibilityaqualitativestudyincomputerscienceandengineeringdisciplines |