Cargando…

Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost saving for utilisation of vaginal delivery (VD), antenatal care (ANC) and an intrauterine device (IUD) services at primary health level facilities (PHLF) instead of tertiary health level facilities (THLF) in Sana’a. DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study. SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein, Raja’a, Yahia Ahmed, Bahubaishi, Najia Saleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056866
_version_ 1784677525583036416
author Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein
Raja’a, Yahia Ahmed
Bahubaishi, Najia Saleh
author_facet Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein
Raja’a, Yahia Ahmed
Bahubaishi, Najia Saleh
author_sort Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost saving for utilisation of vaginal delivery (VD), antenatal care (ANC) and an intrauterine device (IUD) services at primary health level facilities (PHLF) instead of tertiary health level facilities (THLF) in Sana’a. DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study. SETTING: Eight PHLF in Sana’a governorate and three THLF in Sana’a city. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 180 women aged (15–45 years) were enrolled equally from PHLF and THLF. Sixty women attended for each reproductive health service (VD, ANC and IUD services). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The direct and indirect costs of services at PHLF and THLF, and the cost saving for utilisation of PHLF instead of THLF. RESULTS: The median of direct medical cost (DMC) of VD, ANC and IUD services were US$43.86, US$14.77 and US$9.07 at THLF compared with US$19.54, US$0.93 and US$11.17 at PHLF, respectively. The DMC difference of VD, ANC and IUD services between THLF and PHLF was US$24.32, US$13.84 and US$−2.1, respectively. Regarding the direct non-medical costs (DNMC), the median of VD, ANC and IUD services were US$43.05, US$19.07 and US$17.27 at THLF compared with US$13.96, US$0.00 and US$0.00 at PHLF, respectively. The DNMC difference of VD, ANC and IUD service between THLF and PHLF was US$29.09, US$18.07 and US$16.27, respectively. Moreover, the median of indirect cost (INDC) for VD, ANC and IUD services were US$23.93, US$9.49 and US$10.44 at THLF compared with US$7.90, US$1.59 and US$1.06 at PHLF, respectively. The INDC difference of VD, ANC and IUD service between THLF and PHLF was US$16.03, US$7.90 and US$9.38, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study found the utilisation of VD, ANC and IUD services at PHLF instead of THLF is a considerable cost saving for families. Therefore, shifting the utilisation of services from THLF to PHLF reduces the financial burden affecting individuals, families and their productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8961106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89611062022-04-11 Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein Raja’a, Yahia Ahmed Bahubaishi, Najia Saleh BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost saving for utilisation of vaginal delivery (VD), antenatal care (ANC) and an intrauterine device (IUD) services at primary health level facilities (PHLF) instead of tertiary health level facilities (THLF) in Sana’a. DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study. SETTING: Eight PHLF in Sana’a governorate and three THLF in Sana’a city. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 180 women aged (15–45 years) were enrolled equally from PHLF and THLF. Sixty women attended for each reproductive health service (VD, ANC and IUD services). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The direct and indirect costs of services at PHLF and THLF, and the cost saving for utilisation of PHLF instead of THLF. RESULTS: The median of direct medical cost (DMC) of VD, ANC and IUD services were US$43.86, US$14.77 and US$9.07 at THLF compared with US$19.54, US$0.93 and US$11.17 at PHLF, respectively. The DMC difference of VD, ANC and IUD services between THLF and PHLF was US$24.32, US$13.84 and US$−2.1, respectively. Regarding the direct non-medical costs (DNMC), the median of VD, ANC and IUD services were US$43.05, US$19.07 and US$17.27 at THLF compared with US$13.96, US$0.00 and US$0.00 at PHLF, respectively. The DNMC difference of VD, ANC and IUD service between THLF and PHLF was US$29.09, US$18.07 and US$16.27, respectively. Moreover, the median of indirect cost (INDC) for VD, ANC and IUD services were US$23.93, US$9.49 and US$10.44 at THLF compared with US$7.90, US$1.59 and US$1.06 at PHLF, respectively. The INDC difference of VD, ANC and IUD service between THLF and PHLF was US$16.03, US$7.90 and US$9.38, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study found the utilisation of VD, ANC and IUD services at PHLF instead of THLF is a considerable cost saving for families. Therefore, shifting the utilisation of services from THLF to PHLF reduces the financial burden affecting individuals, families and their productivity. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8961106/ /pubmed/35351722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056866 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Nassar, Abdulkareem Ali Hussein
Raja’a, Yahia Ahmed
Bahubaishi, Najia Saleh
Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_full Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_short Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
title_sort cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in sana’a, yemen, 2013: a comparative cross-sectional study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056866
work_keys_str_mv AT nassarabdulkareemalihussein costsavinginprimaryversustertiarylevelofreproductivehealthservicesinsanaayemen2013acomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT rajaayahiaahmed costsavinginprimaryversustertiarylevelofreproductivehealthservicesinsanaayemen2013acomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT bahubaishinajiasaleh costsavinginprimaryversustertiarylevelofreproductivehealthservicesinsanaayemen2013acomparativecrosssectionalstudy