Cargando…

Real-world outcomes of a clinical decision support system for diabetic retinopathy in Spain

OBJECTIVE: The aim of present study was to evaluate our clinical decision support system (CDSS) for predicting risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR). We selected randomly a real population of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who were attending our screening programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero-Aroca, Pedro, Verges, Raquel, Maarof, Najlaa, Vallas-Mateu, Aida, Latorre, Alex, Moreno-Ribas, Antonio, Sagarra-Alamo, Ramon, Basora-Gallisa, Josep, Cristiano, Julian, Baget-Bernaldiz, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-000974
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of present study was to evaluate our clinical decision support system (CDSS) for predicting risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR). We selected randomly a real population of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who were attending our screening programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The sample size was 602 patients with T2DM randomly selected from those who attended the DR screening programme. The algorithm developed uses nine risk factors: current age, sex, body mass index (BMI), duration and treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension, Glicated hemoglobine (HbA1c), urine–albumin ratio and glomerular filtration. RESULTS: The mean current age of 67.03±10.91, and 272 were male (53.2%), and DM duration was 10.12±6.4 years, 222 had DR (35.8%). The CDSS was employed for 1 year. The prediction algorithm that the CDSS uses included nine risk factors: current age, sex, BMI, DM duration and treatment, arterial hypertension, HbA1c, urine–albumin ratio and glomerular filtration. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting the presence of any DR achieved a value of 0.9884, the sensitivity of 98.21%, specificity of 99.21%, positive predictive value of 98.65%, negative predictive value of 98.95%, α error of 0.0079 and β error of 0.0179. CONCLUSION: Our CDSS for predicting DR was successful when applied to a real population.