Cargando…
Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTS: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led cares on cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library database...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058533 |
_version_ | 1784677527735762944 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jiayu Zheng, Xutong Ma, Danyan Liu, Changqin Ding, Yulan |
author_facet | Zhang, Jiayu Zheng, Xutong Ma, Danyan Liu, Changqin Ding, Yulan |
author_sort | Zhang, Jiayu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTS: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led cares on cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of nurse-led care for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) published in English from inception to 23 December 2021. Random effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95%CI. RESULTS: 13 articles were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of3757 participants. Considering baseline measurements, pooled analysis showed that nurse-led care significantly decreased the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (WMD=−0.68 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.85 to –0.52; p<0.001), body mass index (BMI) (WMD=−0.54 kg/m(2); 95% CI: −0.97 to –0.11; p=0.01) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD=−1.17 mmHg; 95% CI: −2.11 to –0.22; p=0.02) for patients with T2DM. But there was no difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (WMD=−2.50 mg/dL ; 95% CI: −5.07 to 0.08; p=0.06) between the nurse-led and control groups. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led care is an effective and accessible intervention that could improve HbA1c, SBP, BMI levels among individuals with T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021248275. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8961115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89611152022-04-11 Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Jiayu Zheng, Xutong Ma, Danyan Liu, Changqin Ding, Yulan BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTS: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led cares on cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of nurse-led care for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) published in English from inception to 23 December 2021. Random effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95%CI. RESULTS: 13 articles were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of3757 participants. Considering baseline measurements, pooled analysis showed that nurse-led care significantly decreased the glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (WMD=−0.68 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.85 to –0.52; p<0.001), body mass index (BMI) (WMD=−0.54 kg/m(2); 95% CI: −0.97 to –0.11; p=0.01) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD=−1.17 mmHg; 95% CI: −2.11 to –0.22; p=0.02) for patients with T2DM. But there was no difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (WMD=−2.50 mg/dL ; 95% CI: −5.07 to 0.08; p=0.06) between the nurse-led and control groups. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led care is an effective and accessible intervention that could improve HbA1c, SBP, BMI levels among individuals with T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021248275. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8961115/ /pubmed/35351730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058533 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Nursing Zhang, Jiayu Zheng, Xutong Ma, Danyan Liu, Changqin Ding, Yulan Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjiayu nurseledcareversususualcareoncardiovascularriskfactorsforpatientswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengxutong nurseledcareversususualcareoncardiovascularriskfactorsforpatientswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT madanyan nurseledcareversususualcareoncardiovascularriskfactorsforpatientswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuchangqin nurseledcareversususualcareoncardiovascularriskfactorsforpatientswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dingyulan nurseledcareversususualcareoncardiovascularriskfactorsforpatientswithtype2diabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |