Cargando…

Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise and evaluate the current evidence of tuberculosis (TB)-associated pregnancy outcomes, (2) evaluate the state of the science of family planning during TB treatment and (3) provide recommendations to move forward to improve care and outcomes during TB disease. DESIGN: Systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Yen, McNabb, Katherine C, Farley, Jason E, Warren, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054833
_version_ 1784677529497370624
author Nguyen, Yen
McNabb, Katherine C
Farley, Jason E
Warren, Nicole
author_facet Nguyen, Yen
McNabb, Katherine C
Farley, Jason E
Warren, Nicole
author_sort Nguyen, Yen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise and evaluate the current evidence of tuberculosis (TB)-associated pregnancy outcomes, (2) evaluate the state of the science of family planning during TB treatment and (3) provide recommendations to move forward to improve care and outcomes during TB disease. DESIGN: Systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from September 2009 to November 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed pregnant women with active TB, drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) or TB/HIV coinfection and examined pregnancy, maternal, fetal/birth and TB or TB/HIV coinfection outcomes. Studies were also included if they examined family planning services among women initiating TB treatment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data using PRISMA guidelines and conducted quality assessment using the Joanna-Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. The level of evidence was reported using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice guidelines. RESULTS: 69 studies were included in this review. Case reports, case series, case controls, cohort studies, secondary data analyses and a service delivery improvement project conducted in 26 countries made up the totality of the evidence. Most studies reported pregnancy complications for mothers (anaemia, postpartum haemorrhage, deaths) and fetuses or newborns (low birth weight, premature birth, and spontaneous or induced abortions). Few studies discussed the value of offering family planning to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. One study examined the effect of a provider training on contraceptive use with reported increased contraceptive use. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating family planning services within a TB treatment programme is essential to reduce adverse TB-associated maternal-child outcomes. Despite well-established adverse pregnancy outcomes, little attention has been paid to family planning to prevent poor pregnancy outcomes for women with TB/DR-TB. Recommendations for clinicians, TB programmes and researchers are provided and reflect evidence presented in this review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8961125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89611252022-04-11 Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review Nguyen, Yen McNabb, Katherine C Farley, Jason E Warren, Nicole BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise and evaluate the current evidence of tuberculosis (TB)-associated pregnancy outcomes, (2) evaluate the state of the science of family planning during TB treatment and (3) provide recommendations to move forward to improve care and outcomes during TB disease. DESIGN: Systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from September 2009 to November 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed pregnant women with active TB, drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) or TB/HIV coinfection and examined pregnancy, maternal, fetal/birth and TB or TB/HIV coinfection outcomes. Studies were also included if they examined family planning services among women initiating TB treatment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data using PRISMA guidelines and conducted quality assessment using the Joanna-Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. The level of evidence was reported using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice guidelines. RESULTS: 69 studies were included in this review. Case reports, case series, case controls, cohort studies, secondary data analyses and a service delivery improvement project conducted in 26 countries made up the totality of the evidence. Most studies reported pregnancy complications for mothers (anaemia, postpartum haemorrhage, deaths) and fetuses or newborns (low birth weight, premature birth, and spontaneous or induced abortions). Few studies discussed the value of offering family planning to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. One study examined the effect of a provider training on contraceptive use with reported increased contraceptive use. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating family planning services within a TB treatment programme is essential to reduce adverse TB-associated maternal-child outcomes. Despite well-established adverse pregnancy outcomes, little attention has been paid to family planning to prevent poor pregnancy outcomes for women with TB/DR-TB. Recommendations for clinicians, TB programmes and researchers are provided and reflect evidence presented in this review. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8961125/ /pubmed/35351713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054833 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Nguyen, Yen
McNabb, Katherine C
Farley, Jason E
Warren, Nicole
Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title_full Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title_fullStr Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title_short Examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
title_sort examining family planning and adverse pregnancy outcomes for women with active tuberculosis disease: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054833
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenyen examiningfamilyplanningandadversepregnancyoutcomesforwomenwithactivetuberculosisdiseaseasystematicreview
AT mcnabbkatherinec examiningfamilyplanningandadversepregnancyoutcomesforwomenwithactivetuberculosisdiseaseasystematicreview
AT farleyjasone examiningfamilyplanningandadversepregnancyoutcomesforwomenwithactivetuberculosisdiseaseasystematicreview
AT warrennicole examiningfamilyplanningandadversepregnancyoutcomesforwomenwithactivetuberculosisdiseaseasystematicreview