Cargando…

Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs

India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudnick, Ivan, Duenas-Martinez, Pablo, Botterud, Audun, Papageorgiou, Dimitri J., Mignone, Bryan K., Rajagopalan, Srinivasan, Harper, Michael R., Ganesan, Karthik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017
_version_ 1784677543931019264
author Rudnick, Ivan
Duenas-Martinez, Pablo
Botterud, Audun
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J.
Mignone, Bryan K.
Rajagopalan, Srinivasan
Harper, Michael R.
Ganesan, Karthik
author_facet Rudnick, Ivan
Duenas-Martinez, Pablo
Botterud, Audun
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J.
Mignone, Bryan K.
Rajagopalan, Srinivasan
Harper, Michael R.
Ganesan, Karthik
author_sort Rudnick, Ivan
collection PubMed
description India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in future natural gas prices and costs for batteries and variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies, under different CO(2) emissions limits and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets. We find a large-scale expansion of VRE, particularly, solar PV, in most scenarios. Furthermore, energy storage competes with natural gas and coal to provide flexibility to integrate VRE. Given a set of technology assumptions, policies that explicitly limit CO(2) emissions are more cost-effective at reducing emissions than RPS policies. The former are also more effective at reducing air pollution than RPS policies by explicitly penalizing CO(2) emissions, thereby reducing coal generation more substantially than RPS policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8961186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89611862022-03-30 Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs Rudnick, Ivan Duenas-Martinez, Pablo Botterud, Audun Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. Mignone, Bryan K. Rajagopalan, Srinivasan Harper, Michael R. Ganesan, Karthik iScience Article India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in future natural gas prices and costs for batteries and variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies, under different CO(2) emissions limits and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets. We find a large-scale expansion of VRE, particularly, solar PV, in most scenarios. Furthermore, energy storage competes with natural gas and coal to provide flexibility to integrate VRE. Given a set of technology assumptions, policies that explicitly limit CO(2) emissions are more cost-effective at reducing emissions than RPS policies. The former are also more effective at reducing air pollution than RPS policies by explicitly penalizing CO(2) emissions, thereby reducing coal generation more substantially than RPS policies. Elsevier 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8961186/ /pubmed/35359809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017 Text en © 2022 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. (EMRE), The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rudnick, Ivan
Duenas-Martinez, Pablo
Botterud, Audun
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J.
Mignone, Bryan K.
Rajagopalan, Srinivasan
Harper, Michael R.
Ganesan, Karthik
Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title_full Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title_fullStr Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title_full_unstemmed Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title_short Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
title_sort decarbonization of the indian electricity sector: technology choices and policy trade-offs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017
work_keys_str_mv AT rudnickivan decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT duenasmartinezpablo decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT botterudaudun decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT papageorgioudimitrij decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT mignonebryank decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT rajagopalansrinivasan decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT harpermichaelr decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs
AT ganesankarthik decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs