Cargando…
Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs
India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017 |
_version_ | 1784677543931019264 |
---|---|
author | Rudnick, Ivan Duenas-Martinez, Pablo Botterud, Audun Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. Mignone, Bryan K. Rajagopalan, Srinivasan Harper, Michael R. Ganesan, Karthik |
author_facet | Rudnick, Ivan Duenas-Martinez, Pablo Botterud, Audun Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. Mignone, Bryan K. Rajagopalan, Srinivasan Harper, Michael R. Ganesan, Karthik |
author_sort | Rudnick, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in future natural gas prices and costs for batteries and variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies, under different CO(2) emissions limits and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets. We find a large-scale expansion of VRE, particularly, solar PV, in most scenarios. Furthermore, energy storage competes with natural gas and coal to provide flexibility to integrate VRE. Given a set of technology assumptions, policies that explicitly limit CO(2) emissions are more cost-effective at reducing emissions than RPS policies. The former are also more effective at reducing air pollution than RPS policies by explicitly penalizing CO(2) emissions, thereby reducing coal generation more substantially than RPS policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8961186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89611862022-03-30 Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs Rudnick, Ivan Duenas-Martinez, Pablo Botterud, Audun Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. Mignone, Bryan K. Rajagopalan, Srinivasan Harper, Michael R. Ganesan, Karthik iScience Article India is the third largest CO(2) emitter worldwide, and its electricity demand, which is primarily supplied by coal-fired generation, is expected to increase almost threefold over the next twenty years. Here, we simulate 40 scenarios for the 2040 Indian electricity sector, considering uncertainty in future natural gas prices and costs for batteries and variable renewable energy (VRE) technologies, under different CO(2) emissions limits and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets. We find a large-scale expansion of VRE, particularly, solar PV, in most scenarios. Furthermore, energy storage competes with natural gas and coal to provide flexibility to integrate VRE. Given a set of technology assumptions, policies that explicitly limit CO(2) emissions are more cost-effective at reducing emissions than RPS policies. The former are also more effective at reducing air pollution than RPS policies by explicitly penalizing CO(2) emissions, thereby reducing coal generation more substantially than RPS policies. Elsevier 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8961186/ /pubmed/35359809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017 Text en © 2022 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. (EMRE), The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rudnick, Ivan Duenas-Martinez, Pablo Botterud, Audun Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. Mignone, Bryan K. Rajagopalan, Srinivasan Harper, Michael R. Ganesan, Karthik Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title | Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title_full | Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title_fullStr | Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title_full_unstemmed | Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title_short | Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs |
title_sort | decarbonization of the indian electricity sector: technology choices and policy trade-offs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudnickivan decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT duenasmartinezpablo decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT botterudaudun decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT papageorgioudimitrij decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT mignonebryank decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT rajagopalansrinivasan decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT harpermichaelr decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs AT ganesankarthik decarbonizationoftheindianelectricitysectortechnologychoicesandpolicytradeoffs |