Cargando…

The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools

BACKGROUND: Reducing bullying is a public health priority. KiVa, a school-based anti-bullying programme, is effective in reducing bullying in Finland and requires rigorous testing in other countries, including the UK. This trial aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa in reduci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarkson, Suzy, Bowes, Lucy, Coulman, Elinor, Broome, Matthew R., Cannings-John, Rebecca, Charles, Joanna M., Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Ford, Tamsin, Hastings, Richard P., Hayes, Rachel, Patterson, Paul, Segrott, Jeremy, Townson, Julia, Watkins, Richard, Badger, Julia, Hutchings, Judy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x
_version_ 1784677604343676928
author Clarkson, Suzy
Bowes, Lucy
Coulman, Elinor
Broome, Matthew R.
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Charles, Joanna M.
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Ford, Tamsin
Hastings, Richard P.
Hayes, Rachel
Patterson, Paul
Segrott, Jeremy
Townson, Julia
Watkins, Richard
Badger, Julia
Hutchings, Judy
author_facet Clarkson, Suzy
Bowes, Lucy
Coulman, Elinor
Broome, Matthew R.
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Charles, Joanna M.
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Ford, Tamsin
Hastings, Richard P.
Hayes, Rachel
Patterson, Paul
Segrott, Jeremy
Townson, Julia
Watkins, Richard
Badger, Julia
Hutchings, Judy
author_sort Clarkson, Suzy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing bullying is a public health priority. KiVa, a school-based anti-bullying programme, is effective in reducing bullying in Finland and requires rigorous testing in other countries, including the UK. This trial aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa in reducing child reported bullying in UK schools compared to usual practice. The trial is currently on-going. Recruitment commenced in October 2019, however due to COVID-19 pandemic and resulting school closures was re-started in October 2020. METHODS: Design: Two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded process and cost-effectiveness evaluation. Participants: 116 primary schools from four areas; North Wales, West Midlands, South East and South West England. Outcomes will be assessed at student level (ages 7–11 years; n = approximately 13,000 students). Intervention: KiVa is a whole school programme with universal actions that places a strong emphasis on changing bystander behaviour alongside indicated actions that provide consistent strategies for dealing with incidents of bullying. KiVa will be implemented over one academic year. Comparator: Usual practice. Primary outcome: Student-level bullying-victimisation assessed through self-report using the extensively used and validated Olweus Bully/Victim questionnaire at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes: student-level bullying-perpetration; student mental health and emotional well-being; student level of, and roles in, bullying; school related well-being; school attendance and academic attainment; and teachers’ self-efficacy in dealing with bullying, mental well-being, and burnout. Sample size: 116 schools (58 per arm) with an assumed ICC of 0.02 will provide 90% power to identify a relative reduction of 22% with a 5% significance level. Randomisation: recruited schools will be randomised on 1:1 basis stratified by Key-Stage 2 size and free school meal status. Process evaluation: assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation, and examine intervention mechanisms. Economic evaluation: Self-reported victimisation, Child Health Utility 9D, Client Service Receipt Inventory, frequency of services used, and intervention costs. The health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective. DISCUSSION: This two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial will evaluate the KiVa anti-bullying intervention to generate evidence of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and scalability of the programme in the UK. Our integrated process evaluation will assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation across England and Wales and examine intervention mechanisms. The integrated health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective. Our trial will also provide evidence regarding the programme impact on inequalities by testing whether KiVa is effective across the socio-economic gradient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials ISRCTN 12300853 Date assigned 11/02/2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8961482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89614822022-03-29 The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools Clarkson, Suzy Bowes, Lucy Coulman, Elinor Broome, Matthew R. Cannings-John, Rebecca Charles, Joanna M. Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Ford, Tamsin Hastings, Richard P. Hayes, Rachel Patterson, Paul Segrott, Jeremy Townson, Julia Watkins, Richard Badger, Julia Hutchings, Judy BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Reducing bullying is a public health priority. KiVa, a school-based anti-bullying programme, is effective in reducing bullying in Finland and requires rigorous testing in other countries, including the UK. This trial aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa in reducing child reported bullying in UK schools compared to usual practice. The trial is currently on-going. Recruitment commenced in October 2019, however due to COVID-19 pandemic and resulting school closures was re-started in October 2020. METHODS: Design: Two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded process and cost-effectiveness evaluation. Participants: 116 primary schools from four areas; North Wales, West Midlands, South East and South West England. Outcomes will be assessed at student level (ages 7–11 years; n = approximately 13,000 students). Intervention: KiVa is a whole school programme with universal actions that places a strong emphasis on changing bystander behaviour alongside indicated actions that provide consistent strategies for dealing with incidents of bullying. KiVa will be implemented over one academic year. Comparator: Usual practice. Primary outcome: Student-level bullying-victimisation assessed through self-report using the extensively used and validated Olweus Bully/Victim questionnaire at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes: student-level bullying-perpetration; student mental health and emotional well-being; student level of, and roles in, bullying; school related well-being; school attendance and academic attainment; and teachers’ self-efficacy in dealing with bullying, mental well-being, and burnout. Sample size: 116 schools (58 per arm) with an assumed ICC of 0.02 will provide 90% power to identify a relative reduction of 22% with a 5% significance level. Randomisation: recruited schools will be randomised on 1:1 basis stratified by Key-Stage 2 size and free school meal status. Process evaluation: assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation, and examine intervention mechanisms. Economic evaluation: Self-reported victimisation, Child Health Utility 9D, Client Service Receipt Inventory, frequency of services used, and intervention costs. The health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective. DISCUSSION: This two-arm pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial will evaluate the KiVa anti-bullying intervention to generate evidence of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and scalability of the programme in the UK. Our integrated process evaluation will assess implementation fidelity, identify influences on KiVa implementation across England and Wales and examine intervention mechanisms. The integrated health economic analysis will be conducted from a schools and societal perspective. Our trial will also provide evidence regarding the programme impact on inequalities by testing whether KiVa is effective across the socio-economic gradient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials ISRCTN 12300853 Date assigned 11/02/2020. BioMed Central 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8961482/ /pubmed/35351054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Clarkson, Suzy
Bowes, Lucy
Coulman, Elinor
Broome, Matthew R.
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Charles, Joanna M.
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Ford, Tamsin
Hastings, Richard P.
Hayes, Rachel
Patterson, Paul
Segrott, Jeremy
Townson, Julia
Watkins, Richard
Badger, Julia
Hutchings, Judy
The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title_full The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title_fullStr The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title_full_unstemmed The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title_short The UK stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools
title_sort uk stand together trial: protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of kiva to reduce bullying in primary schools
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12642-x
work_keys_str_mv AT clarksonsuzy theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT boweslucy theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT coulmanelinor theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT broomematthewr theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT canningsjohnrebecca theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT charlesjoannam theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT edwardsrhiannontudor theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT fordtamsin theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hastingsrichardp theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hayesrachel theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT pattersonpaul theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT segrottjeremy theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT townsonjulia theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT watkinsrichard theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT badgerjulia theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hutchingsjudy theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT theukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT clarksonsuzy ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT boweslucy ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT coulmanelinor ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT broomematthewr ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT canningsjohnrebecca ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT charlesjoannam ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT edwardsrhiannontudor ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT fordtamsin ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hastingsrichardp ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hayesrachel ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT pattersonpaul ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT segrottjeremy ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT townsonjulia ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT watkinsrichard ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT badgerjulia ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT hutchingsjudy ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools
AT ukstandtogethertrialprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofkivatoreducebullyinginprimaryschools