Cargando…
Framework for the synthesis of non-randomised studies and randomised controlled trials: a guidance on conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis for healthcare decision making
Introduction: High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable evidence on the comparative efficacy of new medicines. However, non-randomised studies (NRS) are increasingly recognised as a source of insights into the real-world performance of novel therapeutic products, par...
Autores principales: | Sarri, Grammati, Patorno, Elisabetta, Yuan, Hongbo, Guo, Jianfei (Jeff), Bennett, Dimitri, Wen, Xuerong, Zullo, Andrew R, Largent, Joan, Panaccio, Mary, Gokhale, Mugdha, Moga, Daniela Claudia, Ali, M Sanni, Debray, Thomas P A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111493 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How well can we assess the validity of non-randomised studies of medications? A systematic review of assessment tools
por: D'Andrea, Elvira, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
ISPE‐Endorsed Guidance in Using Electronic Health Records for Comparative Effectiveness Research in COVID‐19: Opportunities and Trade‐Offs
por: Sarri, Grammati, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Machine learning for improving high‐dimensional proxy confounder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature
por: Wyss, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is there an economic case for investing in nursing care – what does the literature tell us?
por: Twigg, Diane E, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework
por: Coleman, Susanne, et al.
Publicado: (2014)