Cargando…

Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is considered to be one of the main causes of absenteeism from work and primary and specialized consultations. The symptoms of nonspecific chronic low back pain may be accompanied by the activation of myofascial trigger points in the muscles, together with local and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen, Gil-Martínez, Esther, Antequera-Soler, Eduardo, Castro-Sánchez, Adelaida María, Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel, García-López, Héctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y
_version_ 1784677686911696896
author Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
Gil-Martínez, Esther
Antequera-Soler, Eduardo
Castro-Sánchez, Adelaida María
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
García-López, Héctor
author_facet Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
Gil-Martínez, Esther
Antequera-Soler, Eduardo
Castro-Sánchez, Adelaida María
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
García-López, Héctor
author_sort Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is considered to be one of the main causes of absenteeism from work and primary and specialized consultations. The symptoms of nonspecific chronic low back pain may be accompanied by the activation of myofascial trigger points in the muscles, together with local and/or referred pain. Electrical dry needling is increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar myofascial pain. Conventional physiotherapy, however, is a popular approach to chronic pathologies, and there is evidence of different modalities of physiotherapy being used in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The aim of this study has been to determine the effectiveness of electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy when applied to active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. METHODS: This is a controlled, randomized, two-arm, double-blind study. A total of 92 patients with chronic low back pain (time to onset ≥ 3 months, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 4) will be recruited from the University of Almería. Participants will be divided into two study groups (n = 40) to receive treatment of low back pain with electrical dry needling and conventional physiotherapy (ischaemic compression, analytic stretching and postural education training dossier). A total of 6 sessions will be administered once a week for 6 weeks. Pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, quality of life, quality of sleep, anxiety and depression, pressure pain threshold, abdominal strength and lumbar mobility will be recorded at 6 weeks (post-immediate) and 2 months after the end of treatment. DISCUSSION: We believe that an approach including electrical dry needling to chronic low back pain dysfunction will be more effective in these patients. The results of this study will inform clinicians on which type of treatment is more beneficial for patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04804228. Registered on 14 January 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8961901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89619012022-03-30 Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen Gil-Martínez, Esther Antequera-Soler, Eduardo Castro-Sánchez, Adelaida María Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel García-López, Héctor Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is considered to be one of the main causes of absenteeism from work and primary and specialized consultations. The symptoms of nonspecific chronic low back pain may be accompanied by the activation of myofascial trigger points in the muscles, together with local and/or referred pain. Electrical dry needling is increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar myofascial pain. Conventional physiotherapy, however, is a popular approach to chronic pathologies, and there is evidence of different modalities of physiotherapy being used in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The aim of this study has been to determine the effectiveness of electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy when applied to active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. METHODS: This is a controlled, randomized, two-arm, double-blind study. A total of 92 patients with chronic low back pain (time to onset ≥ 3 months, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 4) will be recruited from the University of Almería. Participants will be divided into two study groups (n = 40) to receive treatment of low back pain with electrical dry needling and conventional physiotherapy (ischaemic compression, analytic stretching and postural education training dossier). A total of 6 sessions will be administered once a week for 6 weeks. Pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, quality of life, quality of sleep, anxiety and depression, pressure pain threshold, abdominal strength and lumbar mobility will be recorded at 6 weeks (post-immediate) and 2 months after the end of treatment. DISCUSSION: We believe that an approach including electrical dry needling to chronic low back pain dysfunction will be more effective in these patients. The results of this study will inform clinicians on which type of treatment is more beneficial for patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04804228. Registered on 14 January 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8961901/ /pubmed/35346331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
Gil-Martínez, Esther
Antequera-Soler, Eduardo
Castro-Sánchez, Adelaida María
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
García-López, Héctor
Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title_full Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title_short Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
title_sort electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y
work_keys_str_mv AT larapalomoinmaculadacarmen electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT gilmartinezesther electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT antequerasolereduardo electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT castrosanchezadelaidamaria electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT fernandezsanchezmanuel electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT garcialopezhector electricaldryneedlingversusconventionalphysiotherapyinthetreatmentofactiveandlatentmyofascialtriggerpointsinpatientswithnonspecificchroniclowbackpain