Cargando…
A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature
BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction with perforator, fasciocutaneous, muscular, and/or free microvascular flaps is utilized to cover wound defects and improve vascularization and antibiotic/nutrient delivery. Flap use in revision procedures for total knee arthroplasty has been explored previously; howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00145-3 |
_version_ | 1784677699831201792 |
---|---|
author | Chandra, Akhil A. Romanelli, Filippo Tang, Alex Menken, Luke Zhang, Maximilian Feintisch, Adam Liporace, Frank A. Yoon, Richard S. |
author_facet | Chandra, Akhil A. Romanelli, Filippo Tang, Alex Menken, Luke Zhang, Maximilian Feintisch, Adam Liporace, Frank A. Yoon, Richard S. |
author_sort | Chandra, Akhil A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction with perforator, fasciocutaneous, muscular, and/or free microvascular flaps is utilized to cover wound defects and improve vascularization and antibiotic/nutrient delivery. Flap use in revision procedures for total knee arthroplasty has been explored previously; however, current data are limited and studies comparing healing and complication rates between different flap types are lacking. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed on 13 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported healing and complication rates for either gastrocnemius, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi, fasciocutaneous, chimeric, or gracilis flaps in the setting of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). RESULTS: The final cohort included gastrocnemius (n = 421, healing rate 73.8%, complication rate 59.9%), gracilis (n = 9, healing rate 93%, complication rate 55.6%), latissimus dorsi (n = 41, healing rate 67%, complication rate 46.3%), rectus abdominis (n = 3, healing rate 100%, complication rate 0%), fasciocutaneous (n = 78, healing rate 70%, complication rate 19.2%), and chimeric flaps (n = 4, healing rate 100%, complication rate 25%). There was no significant difference when comparing healing rates across flap types (p = 0.39). There was a significant difference when comparing complication rates across flap types (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference being noted between gastrocnemius and fasciocutaneous complication rates (p < 0.0001). All other comparisons between flap types by complication rate were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrocnemius flaps are the workhorse flap in the setting of revision TKA, as evidenced by this review. Healing rates did not vary significantly across flap types, which suggests that determining the appropriate flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in revision TKA should be driven by defect size and location as well as physician experience and patient tolerance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8961959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89619592022-03-30 A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature Chandra, Akhil A. Romanelli, Filippo Tang, Alex Menken, Luke Zhang, Maximilian Feintisch, Adam Liporace, Frank A. Yoon, Richard S. Knee Surg Relat Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction with perforator, fasciocutaneous, muscular, and/or free microvascular flaps is utilized to cover wound defects and improve vascularization and antibiotic/nutrient delivery. Flap use in revision procedures for total knee arthroplasty has been explored previously; however, current data are limited and studies comparing healing and complication rates between different flap types are lacking. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed on 13 January 2022. Studies were included if they reported healing and complication rates for either gastrocnemius, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi, fasciocutaneous, chimeric, or gracilis flaps in the setting of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). RESULTS: The final cohort included gastrocnemius (n = 421, healing rate 73.8%, complication rate 59.9%), gracilis (n = 9, healing rate 93%, complication rate 55.6%), latissimus dorsi (n = 41, healing rate 67%, complication rate 46.3%), rectus abdominis (n = 3, healing rate 100%, complication rate 0%), fasciocutaneous (n = 78, healing rate 70%, complication rate 19.2%), and chimeric flaps (n = 4, healing rate 100%, complication rate 25%). There was no significant difference when comparing healing rates across flap types (p = 0.39). There was a significant difference when comparing complication rates across flap types (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference being noted between gastrocnemius and fasciocutaneous complication rates (p < 0.0001). All other comparisons between flap types by complication rate were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrocnemius flaps are the workhorse flap in the setting of revision TKA, as evidenced by this review. Healing rates did not vary significantly across flap types, which suggests that determining the appropriate flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in revision TKA should be driven by defect size and location as well as physician experience and patient tolerance. BioMed Central 2022-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8961959/ /pubmed/35346398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00145-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chandra, Akhil A. Romanelli, Filippo Tang, Alex Menken, Luke Zhang, Maximilian Feintisch, Adam Liporace, Frank A. Yoon, Richard S. A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title | A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title_full | A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title_fullStr | A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title_short | A comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
title_sort | comparison of healing and complication rates between common flaps utilized in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00145-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandraakhila acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT romanellifilippo acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT tangalex acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT menkenluke acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT zhangmaximilian acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT feintischadam acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT liporacefranka acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT yoonrichards acomparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT chandraakhila comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT romanellifilippo comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT tangalex comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT menkenluke comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT zhangmaximilian comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT feintischadam comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT liporacefranka comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature AT yoonrichards comparisonofhealingandcomplicationratesbetweencommonflapsutilizedintotalkneearthroplastyareviewoftheliterature |