Cargando…

Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts

BACKGROUND: In the past few decades various methods have been proposed to handle missing data of clinical studies, so as to assess the robustness of primary results. Some of the methods are based on the assumption of missing at random (MAR) which assumes subjects who discontinue the treatment will m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shuai, Hu, Haoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9
_version_ 1784677715210665984
author Wang, Shuai
Hu, Haoyan
author_facet Wang, Shuai
Hu, Haoyan
author_sort Wang, Shuai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the past few decades various methods have been proposed to handle missing data of clinical studies, so as to assess the robustness of primary results. Some of the methods are based on the assumption of missing at random (MAR) which assumes subjects who discontinue the treatment will maintain the treatment effect after discontinuation. The agency, however, has expressed concern over methods based on this overly optimistic assumption, because it hardly holds for subjects discontinuing the investigational drug. Although in recent years a good number of sensitivity analyses based on missing not at random (MNAR) assumptions have been proposed, some use very conservative assumption on which it might be hard for sponsors and regulators to reach common ground. METHODS: Here we propose a multiple imputation method targeting at “treatment policy” estimand based on the MNAR assumption. This method can be used as the primary analysis, in addition to serving as a sensitivity analysis. It imputes missing data using information from retrieved dropouts defined as subjects who remain in the study despite occurrence of intercurrent events. Then imputed data long with completers and retrieved dropouts are analyzed altogether and finally multiple results are summarized into a single estimate. According to definition in ICH E9 (R1), this proposed approach fully aligns with the treatment policy estimand but its assumption is much more realistic and reasonable. RESULTS: Our approach has well controlled type I error rate with no loss of power. As expected, the effect size estimates take into account any dilution effect contributed by retrieved dropouts, conforming to the MNAR assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple imputation approaches are always used as sensitivity analyses, this multiple imputation approach can be used as primary analysis for trials with sufficient retrieved dropouts or trials designed to collect retrieved dropouts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89620502022-03-30 Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts Wang, Shuai Hu, Haoyan BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: In the past few decades various methods have been proposed to handle missing data of clinical studies, so as to assess the robustness of primary results. Some of the methods are based on the assumption of missing at random (MAR) which assumes subjects who discontinue the treatment will maintain the treatment effect after discontinuation. The agency, however, has expressed concern over methods based on this overly optimistic assumption, because it hardly holds for subjects discontinuing the investigational drug. Although in recent years a good number of sensitivity analyses based on missing not at random (MNAR) assumptions have been proposed, some use very conservative assumption on which it might be hard for sponsors and regulators to reach common ground. METHODS: Here we propose a multiple imputation method targeting at “treatment policy” estimand based on the MNAR assumption. This method can be used as the primary analysis, in addition to serving as a sensitivity analysis. It imputes missing data using information from retrieved dropouts defined as subjects who remain in the study despite occurrence of intercurrent events. Then imputed data long with completers and retrieved dropouts are analyzed altogether and finally multiple results are summarized into a single estimate. According to definition in ICH E9 (R1), this proposed approach fully aligns with the treatment policy estimand but its assumption is much more realistic and reasonable. RESULTS: Our approach has well controlled type I error rate with no loss of power. As expected, the effect size estimates take into account any dilution effect contributed by retrieved dropouts, conforming to the MNAR assumption. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple imputation approaches are always used as sensitivity analyses, this multiple imputation approach can be used as primary analysis for trials with sufficient retrieved dropouts or trials designed to collect retrieved dropouts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9. BioMed Central 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8962050/ /pubmed/35350976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Shuai
Hu, Haoyan
Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title_full Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title_fullStr Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title_full_unstemmed Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title_short Impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
title_sort impute the missing data using retrieved dropouts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01509-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshuai imputethemissingdatausingretrieveddropouts
AT huhaoyan imputethemissingdatausingretrieveddropouts