Cargando…

An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mankelow, Jagjit, Ryan, Cormac G., Green, Paul W., Taylor, Paul C., Martin, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2
_version_ 1784677719661871104
author Mankelow, Jagjit
Ryan, Cormac G.
Green, Paul W.
Taylor, Paul C.
Martin, Denis
author_facet Mankelow, Jagjit
Ryan, Cormac G.
Green, Paul W.
Taylor, Paul C.
Martin, Denis
author_sort Mankelow, Jagjit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE). METHODS: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention. RESULTS: Clinicians’ relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients’ passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians’ lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04587596) in October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89620692022-03-30 An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education Mankelow, Jagjit Ryan, Cormac G. Green, Paul W. Taylor, Paul C. Martin, Denis BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE). METHODS: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention. RESULTS: Clinicians’ relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients’ passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians’ lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04587596) in October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8962069/ /pubmed/35351106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mankelow, Jagjit
Ryan, Cormac G.
Green, Paul W.
Taylor, Paul C.
Martin, Denis
An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title_full An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title_fullStr An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title_full_unstemmed An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title_short An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
title_sort exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mankelowjagjit anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT ryancormacg anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT greenpaulw anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT taylorpaulc anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT martindenis anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT mankelowjagjit explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT ryancormacg explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT greenpaulw explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT taylorpaulc explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation
AT martindenis explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation