Cargando…
An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2 |
_version_ | 1784677719661871104 |
---|---|
author | Mankelow, Jagjit Ryan, Cormac G. Green, Paul W. Taylor, Paul C. Martin, Denis |
author_facet | Mankelow, Jagjit Ryan, Cormac G. Green, Paul W. Taylor, Paul C. Martin, Denis |
author_sort | Mankelow, Jagjit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE). METHODS: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention. RESULTS: Clinicians’ relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients’ passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians’ lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04587596) in October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8962069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89620692022-03-30 An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education Mankelow, Jagjit Ryan, Cormac G. Green, Paul W. Taylor, Paul C. Martin, Denis BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE). METHODS: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention. RESULTS: Clinicians’ relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients’ passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians’ lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04587596) in October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8962069/ /pubmed/35351106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mankelow, Jagjit Ryan, Cormac G. Green, Paul W. Taylor, Paul C. Martin, Denis An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title | An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title_full | An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title_fullStr | An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title_full_unstemmed | An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title_short | An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
title_sort | exploration of primary care healthcare professionals’ understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mankelowjagjit anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT ryancormacg anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT greenpaulw anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT taylorpaulc anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT martindenis anexplorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT mankelowjagjit explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT ryancormacg explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT greenpaulw explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT taylorpaulc explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation AT martindenis explorationofprimarycarehealthcareprofessionalsunderstandingofpainandpainmanagementfollowingabriefpainscienceeducation |