Cargando…

Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers, such as leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), have been commonly used to predict the occurrence of life-threatening bacteremia and provide prognostic information, given the need for prompt intervention. However, such diagnosis methods require muc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lien, Frank, Lin, Huang-Shen, Wu, You-Ting, Chiueh, Tzong-Shi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7
_version_ 1784677763923312640
author Lien, Frank
Lin, Huang-Shen
Wu, You-Ting
Chiueh, Tzong-Shi
author_facet Lien, Frank
Lin, Huang-Shen
Wu, You-Ting
Chiueh, Tzong-Shi
author_sort Lien, Frank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomarkers, such as leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), have been commonly used to predict the occurrence of life-threatening bacteremia and provide prognostic information, given the need for prompt intervention. However, such diagnosis methods require much time and money. Therefore, we propose a method with a high prediction capability using machine learning (ML) models based on complete blood count (CBC) and differential leukocyte count (DC) and compare its performance with traditional CRP or PCT biomarker methods and those of models incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers. METHODS: We collected 366,586 daily blood culture (BC) results, of which 350,775 (93.2%), 308,803 (82.1%), and 23,912 (6.4%) cases were issued CBC/DC (CBC/DC group), CRP with CBC/DC (CRP&CBC/DC group), and PCT with CBC/DC (PCT&CBC/DC group), respectively. For the ML methods, conventional logistic regression and random forest models were selected, trained, applied, and validated for each group. Fivefold validation and prediction capability were also evaluated and reported. RESULTS: Overall, the ML methods, such as the random forest model, demonstrated promising performances. When trained with CBC/DC data, it achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.802, which is superior to the prediction conventionally made with CRP/PCT levels (0.699/0.731). Upon evaluating the performance enhanced by incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers, it reported no substantial AUC increase with the addition of either CRP or PCT to CBC/DC data, which suggests the predicting power and applicability of using only CBC/DC data. Moreover, it showed competitive prognostic capability compared to the PCT test with similar all-cause in-hospital mortality (45.10% vs. 47.40%) and overall median survival time (27 vs. 25 days). CONCLUSIONS: The ML models using only CBC/DC data yielded more accurate bacteremia predictions compared to those by methods using CRP and PCT data and reached similar prognostic performance as by PCT data. Thus, such models are potentially complementary and competitive with traditional CRP and PCT biomarkers for conducting and guiding antibiotic usage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89622792022-03-30 Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests Lien, Frank Lin, Huang-Shen Wu, You-Ting Chiueh, Tzong-Shi BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Biomarkers, such as leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), have been commonly used to predict the occurrence of life-threatening bacteremia and provide prognostic information, given the need for prompt intervention. However, such diagnosis methods require much time and money. Therefore, we propose a method with a high prediction capability using machine learning (ML) models based on complete blood count (CBC) and differential leukocyte count (DC) and compare its performance with traditional CRP or PCT biomarker methods and those of models incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers. METHODS: We collected 366,586 daily blood culture (BC) results, of which 350,775 (93.2%), 308,803 (82.1%), and 23,912 (6.4%) cases were issued CBC/DC (CBC/DC group), CRP with CBC/DC (CRP&CBC/DC group), and PCT with CBC/DC (PCT&CBC/DC group), respectively. For the ML methods, conventional logistic regression and random forest models were selected, trained, applied, and validated for each group. Fivefold validation and prediction capability were also evaluated and reported. RESULTS: Overall, the ML methods, such as the random forest model, demonstrated promising performances. When trained with CBC/DC data, it achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.802, which is superior to the prediction conventionally made with CRP/PCT levels (0.699/0.731). Upon evaluating the performance enhanced by incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers, it reported no substantial AUC increase with the addition of either CRP or PCT to CBC/DC data, which suggests the predicting power and applicability of using only CBC/DC data. Moreover, it showed competitive prognostic capability compared to the PCT test with similar all-cause in-hospital mortality (45.10% vs. 47.40%) and overall median survival time (27 vs. 25 days). CONCLUSIONS: The ML models using only CBC/DC data yielded more accurate bacteremia predictions compared to those by methods using CRP and PCT data and reached similar prognostic performance as by PCT data. Thus, such models are potentially complementary and competitive with traditional CRP and PCT biomarkers for conducting and guiding antibiotic usage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8962279/ /pubmed/35351003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lien, Frank
Lin, Huang-Shen
Wu, You-Ting
Chiueh, Tzong-Shi
Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title_full Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title_fullStr Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title_full_unstemmed Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title_short Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
title_sort bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with c-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lienfrank bacteremiadetectionfromcompletebloodcountanddifferentialleukocytecountwithmachinelearningcomplementaryandcompetitivewithcreactiveproteinandprocalcitonintests
AT linhuangshen bacteremiadetectionfromcompletebloodcountanddifferentialleukocytecountwithmachinelearningcomplementaryandcompetitivewithcreactiveproteinandprocalcitonintests
AT wuyouting bacteremiadetectionfromcompletebloodcountanddifferentialleukocytecountwithmachinelearningcomplementaryandcompetitivewithcreactiveproteinandprocalcitonintests
AT chiuehtzongshi bacteremiadetectionfromcompletebloodcountanddifferentialleukocytecountwithmachinelearningcomplementaryandcompetitivewithcreactiveproteinandprocalcitonintests