Cargando…
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03052-1 |
_version_ | 1784677811688046592 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Jun Ho Bae, Junseok Lee, Dong Chan Shin, Sang-Ha Keum, Han Joong Choi, Young Soo Eun, Sang Soo Shin, Seung Ho Hong, Hyun Jin Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Tae Hyun Lim, Woojung Kim, Junghoon Park, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Lee, Hong-Jae |
author_facet | Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Jun Ho Bae, Junseok Lee, Dong Chan Shin, Sang-Ha Keum, Han Joong Choi, Young Soo Eun, Sang Soo Shin, Seung Ho Hong, Hyun Jin Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Tae Hyun Lim, Woojung Kim, Junghoon Park, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Lee, Hong-Jae |
author_sort | Kim, Jin-Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted. METHODS: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8962468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89624682022-03-30 Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Jun Ho Bae, Junseok Lee, Dong Chan Shin, Sang-Ha Keum, Han Joong Choi, Young Soo Eun, Sang Soo Shin, Seung Ho Hong, Hyun Jin Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Tae Hyun Lim, Woojung Kim, Junghoon Park, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Lee, Hong-Jae J Orthop Surg Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted. METHODS: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021). BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8962468/ /pubmed/35346274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03052-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kim, Jin-Sung Lee, Jun Ho Bae, Junseok Lee, Dong Chan Shin, Sang-Ha Keum, Han Joong Choi, Young Soo Eun, Sang Soo Shin, Seung Ho Hong, Hyun Jin Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Tae Hyun Lim, Woojung Kim, Junghoon Park, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Lee, Hong-Jae Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title | Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title_full | Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title_short | Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
title_sort | comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (endo-f trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03052-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjinsung comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT leejunho comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT baejunseok comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT leedongchan comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT shinsangha comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT keumhanjoong comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT choiyoungsoo comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT eunsangsoo comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT shinseungho comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT honghyunjin comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT kimjiyeon comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT kimtaehyun comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT limwoojung comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT kimjunghoon comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT parksangmin comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT parkhyunjin comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT leehongjae comparativestudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofminimallyinvasiveinterlaminarfullendoscopicdiscectomyversusconventionalmicroscopicdiscectomyinsinglelevellumbarherniatedintervertebraldiscendoftrialamulticenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialprotocol |