Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction with open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures by anterograde intramedullary nailing. METHODS: The data of 63 patients with femoral shaft fractures, treated between January 2016 and June 2021, were retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shufeng, Zhang, Zefeng, Yan, Yipeng, Li, Yizhong, Lin, Jinkuang, Ye, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03067-8
_version_ 1784677813765275648
author Lin, Shufeng
Zhang, Zefeng
Yan, Yipeng
Li, Yizhong
Lin, Jinkuang
Ye, Hui
author_facet Lin, Shufeng
Zhang, Zefeng
Yan, Yipeng
Li, Yizhong
Lin, Jinkuang
Ye, Hui
author_sort Lin, Shufeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction with open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures by anterograde intramedullary nailing. METHODS: The data of 63 patients with femoral shaft fractures, treated between January 2016 and June 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received anterograde intramedullary nail fixation, and the OA/OTA classification of fractures was 32-C. The average follow-up period was 13 months (range: 11–14 months). According to the method of fracture reduction, patients were divided into a small-incision clamp-reduction group (referred to as the clamp-reduction group) and an open-reduction group. The reduction time, operative time, the number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, postoperative time to discharge, and the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in reduction time, operative time, the number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, postoperative time to discharge (t = 6.718, − 11.679, 18.963, − 11.609, − 22.432, − 7.187; P < 0.05). In the clamp-reduction group, there was no intraoperative blood transfusion. However, there were one case of wound infection and one case of deep vein thrombosis after operation. In the open-reduction group, ten patients received intraoperative blood transfusion, one patient developed hemorrhagic shock, two patients developed wound infection, and two patients developed bone nonunion during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups had good functional recovery after operation. However, compared with open reduction, clamp reduction is a safer reduction method with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and fewer postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89624822022-03-30 Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study Lin, Shufeng Zhang, Zefeng Yan, Yipeng Li, Yizhong Lin, Jinkuang Ye, Hui J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction with open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures by anterograde intramedullary nailing. METHODS: The data of 63 patients with femoral shaft fractures, treated between January 2016 and June 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received anterograde intramedullary nail fixation, and the OA/OTA classification of fractures was 32-C. The average follow-up period was 13 months (range: 11–14 months). According to the method of fracture reduction, patients were divided into a small-incision clamp-reduction group (referred to as the clamp-reduction group) and an open-reduction group. The reduction time, operative time, the number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, postoperative time to discharge, and the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in reduction time, operative time, the number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, postoperative time to discharge (t = 6.718, − 11.679, 18.963, − 11.609, − 22.432, − 7.187; P < 0.05). In the clamp-reduction group, there was no intraoperative blood transfusion. However, there were one case of wound infection and one case of deep vein thrombosis after operation. In the open-reduction group, ten patients received intraoperative blood transfusion, one patient developed hemorrhagic shock, two patients developed wound infection, and two patients developed bone nonunion during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups had good functional recovery after operation. However, compared with open reduction, clamp reduction is a safer reduction method with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and fewer postoperative complications. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8962482/ /pubmed/35346280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03067-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Shufeng
Zhang, Zefeng
Yan, Yipeng
Li, Yizhong
Lin, Jinkuang
Ye, Hui
Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of small-incision clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an anterograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03067-8
work_keys_str_mv AT linshufeng comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangzefeng comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy
AT yanyipeng comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy
AT liyizhong comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy
AT linjinkuang comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy
AT yehui comparisonoftheefficacyofsmallincisionclampassistedreductionandopenreductionforthetreatmentoffemoralshaftfractureswithananterogradeintramedullarynailaretrospectivestudy