Cargando…

Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the preliminary efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of the 3-month Body Balance Beyond (BBB) online program among Australian women with overweight/obesity and recent gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Women were  randomised into either: 1) High Personalisation (HP) (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Rachael, Rollo, Megan E., Baldwin, Jennifer N., Hutchesson, Melinda, Aguiar, Elroy J., Wynne, Katie, Young, Ashley, Callister, Robin, Collins, Clare E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01275-3
_version_ 1784677825752596480
author Taylor, Rachael
Rollo, Megan E.
Baldwin, Jennifer N.
Hutchesson, Melinda
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Wynne, Katie
Young, Ashley
Callister, Robin
Collins, Clare E.
author_facet Taylor, Rachael
Rollo, Megan E.
Baldwin, Jennifer N.
Hutchesson, Melinda
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Wynne, Katie
Young, Ashley
Callister, Robin
Collins, Clare E.
author_sort Taylor, Rachael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the preliminary efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of the 3-month Body Balance Beyond (BBB) online program among Australian women with overweight/obesity and recent gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Women were  randomised into either: 1) High Personalisation (HP) (access to ‘BBB’ website, video coaching sessions, text message support); 2) Medium Personalisation (MP) (website and text message support); or 3) Low Personalisation (LP) (website only). Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate preliminary efficacy, weight, diet quality, physical activity levels, self-efficacy and quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 3-months. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention metrics and acceptability determined via online process evaluation survey at 3-months. RESULTS: Eighty three women were randomised, with 76 completing the study. Self-efficacy scores showed significant improvements in confidence to resist eating in a variety of situations from baseline to 3-months in HP compared to MP and LP groups (P=.03). The difference in mean QoL scores favoured the HP compared to MP and LP groups (P=.03). Half of the women (HP n=17[81%], MP n=12[75%], LP n=9[56%]) lost weight at 3-months. No significant group-by-time effect were reported for other outcomes. Two-thirds of women in the HP group were satisfied with the program overall and 86% would recommend it to others, compared with 25% and 44% in the MP group, and 14% and 36% in the LP group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Video coaching sessions were associated with improvements in QoL scores and self-efficacy, however further refinement of the BBB website and text messages support could improve program acceptability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000162112, registered 5 February 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-022-01275-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89625482022-03-30 Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial Taylor, Rachael Rollo, Megan E. Baldwin, Jennifer N. Hutchesson, Melinda Aguiar, Elroy J. Wynne, Katie Young, Ashley Callister, Robin Collins, Clare E. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the preliminary efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of the 3-month Body Balance Beyond (BBB) online program among Australian women with overweight/obesity and recent gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Women were  randomised into either: 1) High Personalisation (HP) (access to ‘BBB’ website, video coaching sessions, text message support); 2) Medium Personalisation (MP) (website and text message support); or 3) Low Personalisation (LP) (website only). Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate preliminary efficacy, weight, diet quality, physical activity levels, self-efficacy and quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 3-months. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention metrics and acceptability determined via online process evaluation survey at 3-months. RESULTS: Eighty three women were randomised, with 76 completing the study. Self-efficacy scores showed significant improvements in confidence to resist eating in a variety of situations from baseline to 3-months in HP compared to MP and LP groups (P=.03). The difference in mean QoL scores favoured the HP compared to MP and LP groups (P=.03). Half of the women (HP n=17[81%], MP n=12[75%], LP n=9[56%]) lost weight at 3-months. No significant group-by-time effect were reported for other outcomes. Two-thirds of women in the HP group were satisfied with the program overall and 86% would recommend it to others, compared with 25% and 44% in the MP group, and 14% and 36% in the LP group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Video coaching sessions were associated with improvements in QoL scores and self-efficacy, however further refinement of the BBB website and text messages support could improve program acceptability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000162112, registered 5 February 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-022-01275-3. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8962548/ /pubmed/35346229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01275-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Taylor, Rachael
Rollo, Megan E.
Baldwin, Jennifer N.
Hutchesson, Melinda
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Wynne, Katie
Young, Ashley
Callister, Robin
Collins, Clare E.
Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title_full Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title_short Evaluation of a Type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
title_sort evaluation of a type 2 diabetes risk reduction online program for women with recent gestational diabetes: a randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01275-3
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorrachael evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT rollomegane evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT baldwinjennifern evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT hutchessonmelinda evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT aguiarelroyj evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT wynnekatie evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT youngashley evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT callisterrobin evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial
AT collinsclaree evaluationofatype2diabetesriskreductiononlineprogramforwomenwithrecentgestationaldiabetesarandomisedtrial