Cargando…

The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study

BACKGROUND: Although a range of risk factors have been linked with poor mental health across the population, the underlying pathways leading to mental ill health remain unclear. There is a need to investigate the effects and interplay of both protective and risk factors. This population-based study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseliou, Foteini, Ashfield-Watt, Pauline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13013-2
_version_ 1784677829735088128
author Tseliou, Foteini
Ashfield-Watt, Pauline
author_facet Tseliou, Foteini
Ashfield-Watt, Pauline
author_sort Tseliou, Foteini
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although a range of risk factors have been linked with poor mental health across the population, the underlying pathways leading to mental ill health remain unclear. There is a need to investigate the effects and interplay of both protective and risk factors. This population-based study aimed to explore the effects of individual and contextual factors on mental health status. Record-linkage was implemented between health and lifestyle data drawn from HealthWise Wales (HWW), a national population health survey of people > 16 years who live or access their healthcare in Wales, and treatment data from primary healthcare records. Mental health status was assessed using three different measures, including the self-reported MHI-5 and WEMWBS scales and mental health treatment in electronic healthcare records (EHR). RESULT: Using cross-sectional data from 27,869 HWW participants aged over 16 years, lifestyle factors, resilience, social cohesion and neighbourhood attraction were associated with mental health across all measures. However, compared to contextual factors, the cluster of individual factors was more closely associated with poor mental health, explaining more of the variance across all measures used (MHI-5: 9.8% versus 5.4%; WEMWBS: 15.9% versus 10.3%; EHR: 5.5% versus 3.0%). Additional analysis on resilience sub-constructs indicated that personal skills were the most closely correlated with poorer mental health. CONCLUSION: Mental health status was more closely linked with individual factors across the population than contextual factors. Interventions focusing on improving individual resilience and coping skills could improve mental health outcomes and reduce the negative effect of contextual factors such as negative neighbourhood perceptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13013-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89625642022-03-30 The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study Tseliou, Foteini Ashfield-Watt, Pauline BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Although a range of risk factors have been linked with poor mental health across the population, the underlying pathways leading to mental ill health remain unclear. There is a need to investigate the effects and interplay of both protective and risk factors. This population-based study aimed to explore the effects of individual and contextual factors on mental health status. Record-linkage was implemented between health and lifestyle data drawn from HealthWise Wales (HWW), a national population health survey of people > 16 years who live or access their healthcare in Wales, and treatment data from primary healthcare records. Mental health status was assessed using three different measures, including the self-reported MHI-5 and WEMWBS scales and mental health treatment in electronic healthcare records (EHR). RESULT: Using cross-sectional data from 27,869 HWW participants aged over 16 years, lifestyle factors, resilience, social cohesion and neighbourhood attraction were associated with mental health across all measures. However, compared to contextual factors, the cluster of individual factors was more closely associated with poor mental health, explaining more of the variance across all measures used (MHI-5: 9.8% versus 5.4%; WEMWBS: 15.9% versus 10.3%; EHR: 5.5% versus 3.0%). Additional analysis on resilience sub-constructs indicated that personal skills were the most closely correlated with poorer mental health. CONCLUSION: Mental health status was more closely linked with individual factors across the population than contextual factors. Interventions focusing on improving individual resilience and coping skills could improve mental health outcomes and reduce the negative effect of contextual factors such as negative neighbourhood perceptions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13013-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8962564/ /pubmed/35351041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13013-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tseliou, Foteini
Ashfield-Watt, Pauline
The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title_full The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title_fullStr The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title_full_unstemmed The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title_short The association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
title_sort association between resilience resources, contextual factors and mental health status: a national population-based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13013-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tselioufoteini theassociationbetweenresilienceresourcescontextualfactorsandmentalhealthstatusanationalpopulationbasedstudy
AT ashfieldwattpauline theassociationbetweenresilienceresourcescontextualfactorsandmentalhealthstatusanationalpopulationbasedstudy
AT tselioufoteini associationbetweenresilienceresourcescontextualfactorsandmentalhealthstatusanationalpopulationbasedstudy
AT ashfieldwattpauline associationbetweenresilienceresourcescontextualfactorsandmentalhealthstatusanationalpopulationbasedstudy