Cargando…

Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?

Annual forages provide a valuable grazing resource for cattle producers; however, annuals are prone to accumulating nitrate and have the potential to cause nitrate toxicity. Although these forages pose a risk of containing high nitrate concentrations, they can be a high-quality feed source. Understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Mary Beth, Drewnoski, Mary E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac023
_version_ 1784677863576829952
author Reynolds, Mary Beth
Drewnoski, Mary E
author_facet Reynolds, Mary Beth
Drewnoski, Mary E
author_sort Reynolds, Mary Beth
collection PubMed
description Annual forages provide a valuable grazing resource for cattle producers; however, annuals are prone to accumulating nitrate and have the potential to cause nitrate toxicity. Although these forages pose a risk of containing high nitrate concentrations, they can be a high-quality feed source. Understanding the factors that affect the potential for toxicity when using these forages is important to help nutritionists and producers make management decisions. This review describes the previous research, current guidelines for nitrate toxicity, and the potential for improvement in our current recommendations. Current extension toxicity guidelines appear to be founded primarily on drenching based studies and overestimate the nitrate toxicity potential of forages. Recommendations need to account for multiple factors that affect the threshold for toxicity. There is evidence that fresh forages have a lower risk of toxicity because of slower release of nitrate into the rumen and a slower rate of dry matter intake. Increased dietary energy and sulfur content reduce the potential for toxicity. Microbial adaptation can reduce the risk and allow use of potentially toxic forages. These factors should influence feeding recommendations. However, there is currently not enough data available to establish new guidelines that account for these main factors. Thus, there is a need for renewed research in this area. The limited number of studies grazing elevated nitrate forages seems to suggest that there is less risk in grazing situations, especially if animals graze selectively. There is a need to develop guidelines for nitrate toxicity and management recommendations when grazing. To accomplish this, there is a need for more studies to evaluate risk of toxicity in grazing situations. These grazing studies need to evaluate the effects of nitrate concentration, forage quality, and grazing management on the potential for nitrate toxicity. While the conservative guidelines that are currently in use reduce risk of nitrate toxicity, they may also cause a significant increase in feed costs for producers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89627492022-03-29 Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages? Reynolds, Mary Beth Drewnoski, Mary E Transl Anim Sci Review Annual forages provide a valuable grazing resource for cattle producers; however, annuals are prone to accumulating nitrate and have the potential to cause nitrate toxicity. Although these forages pose a risk of containing high nitrate concentrations, they can be a high-quality feed source. Understanding the factors that affect the potential for toxicity when using these forages is important to help nutritionists and producers make management decisions. This review describes the previous research, current guidelines for nitrate toxicity, and the potential for improvement in our current recommendations. Current extension toxicity guidelines appear to be founded primarily on drenching based studies and overestimate the nitrate toxicity potential of forages. Recommendations need to account for multiple factors that affect the threshold for toxicity. There is evidence that fresh forages have a lower risk of toxicity because of slower release of nitrate into the rumen and a slower rate of dry matter intake. Increased dietary energy and sulfur content reduce the potential for toxicity. Microbial adaptation can reduce the risk and allow use of potentially toxic forages. These factors should influence feeding recommendations. However, there is currently not enough data available to establish new guidelines that account for these main factors. Thus, there is a need for renewed research in this area. The limited number of studies grazing elevated nitrate forages seems to suggest that there is less risk in grazing situations, especially if animals graze selectively. There is a need to develop guidelines for nitrate toxicity and management recommendations when grazing. To accomplish this, there is a need for more studies to evaluate risk of toxicity in grazing situations. These grazing studies need to evaluate the effects of nitrate concentration, forage quality, and grazing management on the potential for nitrate toxicity. While the conservative guidelines that are currently in use reduce risk of nitrate toxicity, they may also cause a significant increase in feed costs for producers. Oxford University Press 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8962749/ /pubmed/35356231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review
Reynolds, Mary Beth
Drewnoski, Mary E
Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title_full Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title_fullStr Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title_full_unstemmed Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title_short Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
title_sort is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac023
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsmarybeth isittimetorethinkouronesizefitsallapproachtonitratetoxicitythresholdsinforages
AT drewnoskimarye isittimetorethinkouronesizefitsallapproachtonitratetoxicitythresholdsinforages