Cargando…

Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients

INTRODUCTION: Coagulation parameters are important determinants for COVID-19 infection. We conducted meta-analysis to assess the association between early hemostatic parameters and infection severity. METHODS: Electronic search was made for papers that addressed clinical characteristics of COVID-19...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Len, Polina, Iskakova, Gaukhar, Sautbayeva, Zarina, Kussanova, Aigul, Tauekelova, Ainur T., Sugralimova, Madina M., Dautbaeva, Anar S., Abdieva, Meruert M., Ponomarev, Eugene D., Tikhonov, Alexander, Bekbossynova, Makhabbat S., Barteneva, Natasha S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.794092
_version_ 1784677868862701568
author Len, Polina
Iskakova, Gaukhar
Sautbayeva, Zarina
Kussanova, Aigul
Tauekelova, Ainur T.
Sugralimova, Madina M.
Dautbaeva, Anar S.
Abdieva, Meruert M.
Ponomarev, Eugene D.
Tikhonov, Alexander
Bekbossynova, Makhabbat S.
Barteneva, Natasha S.
author_facet Len, Polina
Iskakova, Gaukhar
Sautbayeva, Zarina
Kussanova, Aigul
Tauekelova, Ainur T.
Sugralimova, Madina M.
Dautbaeva, Anar S.
Abdieva, Meruert M.
Ponomarev, Eugene D.
Tikhonov, Alexander
Bekbossynova, Makhabbat S.
Barteneva, Natasha S.
author_sort Len, Polina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Coagulation parameters are important determinants for COVID-19 infection. We conducted meta-analysis to assess the association between early hemostatic parameters and infection severity. METHODS: Electronic search was made for papers that addressed clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients and disease severity. Results were filtered using exclusion and inclusion criteria and then pooled into a meta-analysis to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for D-dimers, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, platelet count (PLT), activated partial thromboplastin time. To explore the heterogeneity and robustness of our fundings, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Publication bias was assessed with contour-enhanced funnel plots and Egger's test by linear regression. Coagulation parameters data from retrospective cohort study of 451 patients with COVID-19 at National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery were included in meta-analysis of published studies. RESULTS: Overall, 41 original studies (17,601 patients) on SARS-CoV-2 were included. For the two groups of patients, stratified by severity, we identified that D-dimers, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were significantly higher in the severe group [SMD 0.6985 with 95%CI (0.5155; 0.8815); SMD 0.661 with 95%CI (0.3387; 0.9833); SMD 0.2683 with 95%CI (0.1357; 0.4009); SMD 0.284 with 95%CI (0.1472; 0.4208)]. In contrast, PLT was significantly lower in patients with more severe cases of COVID-19 [SMD −0.1684 with 95%CI (−0.2826; −0.0542)]. Neither the analysis by the leave-one-out method nor the influence diagnostic have identified studies that solely cause significant change in the effect size estimates. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between articles originated from different countries but revealed that severity assessment criteria might have influence over estimated effect sizes for platelets and D-dimers. Contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger's test for D-dimers and fibrinogen revealed significant asymmetry that might be a sign of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The hemostatic laboratory parameters, with exception of platelets, are significantly elevated in patients with severe COVID-19. The two variables with strongest association to disease severity were D-dimers and fibrinogen levels. Future research should aim outside conventional coagulation tests and include analysis of clotting formation and platelet/platelet progenitors characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8962835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89628352022-03-30 Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients Len, Polina Iskakova, Gaukhar Sautbayeva, Zarina Kussanova, Aigul Tauekelova, Ainur T. Sugralimova, Madina M. Dautbaeva, Anar S. Abdieva, Meruert M. Ponomarev, Eugene D. Tikhonov, Alexander Bekbossynova, Makhabbat S. Barteneva, Natasha S. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Coagulation parameters are important determinants for COVID-19 infection. We conducted meta-analysis to assess the association between early hemostatic parameters and infection severity. METHODS: Electronic search was made for papers that addressed clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients and disease severity. Results were filtered using exclusion and inclusion criteria and then pooled into a meta-analysis to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for D-dimers, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, platelet count (PLT), activated partial thromboplastin time. To explore the heterogeneity and robustness of our fundings, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Publication bias was assessed with contour-enhanced funnel plots and Egger's test by linear regression. Coagulation parameters data from retrospective cohort study of 451 patients with COVID-19 at National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery were included in meta-analysis of published studies. RESULTS: Overall, 41 original studies (17,601 patients) on SARS-CoV-2 were included. For the two groups of patients, stratified by severity, we identified that D-dimers, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were significantly higher in the severe group [SMD 0.6985 with 95%CI (0.5155; 0.8815); SMD 0.661 with 95%CI (0.3387; 0.9833); SMD 0.2683 with 95%CI (0.1357; 0.4009); SMD 0.284 with 95%CI (0.1472; 0.4208)]. In contrast, PLT was significantly lower in patients with more severe cases of COVID-19 [SMD −0.1684 with 95%CI (−0.2826; −0.0542)]. Neither the analysis by the leave-one-out method nor the influence diagnostic have identified studies that solely cause significant change in the effect size estimates. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between articles originated from different countries but revealed that severity assessment criteria might have influence over estimated effect sizes for platelets and D-dimers. Contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger's test for D-dimers and fibrinogen revealed significant asymmetry that might be a sign of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The hemostatic laboratory parameters, with exception of platelets, are significantly elevated in patients with severe COVID-19. The two variables with strongest association to disease severity were D-dimers and fibrinogen levels. Future research should aim outside conventional coagulation tests and include analysis of clotting formation and platelet/platelet progenitors characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8962835/ /pubmed/35360017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.794092 Text en Copyright © 2022 Len, Iskakova, Sautbayeva, Kussanova, Tauekelova, Sugralimova, Dautbaeva, Abdieva, Ponomarev, Tikhonov, Bekbossynova and Barteneva. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Len, Polina
Iskakova, Gaukhar
Sautbayeva, Zarina
Kussanova, Aigul
Tauekelova, Ainur T.
Sugralimova, Madina M.
Dautbaeva, Anar S.
Abdieva, Meruert M.
Ponomarev, Eugene D.
Tikhonov, Alexander
Bekbossynova, Makhabbat S.
Barteneva, Natasha S.
Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title_full Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title_short Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Coagulation Disbalances in COVID-19: 41 Studies and 17,601 Patients
title_sort meta-analysis and systematic review of coagulation disbalances in covid-19: 41 studies and 17,601 patients
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8962835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.794092
work_keys_str_mv AT lenpolina metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT iskakovagaukhar metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT sautbayevazarina metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT kussanovaaigul metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT tauekelovaainurt metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT sugralimovamadinam metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT dautbaevaanars metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT abdievameruertm metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT ponomareveugened metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT tikhonovalexander metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT bekbossynovamakhabbats metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients
AT bartenevanatashas metaanalysisandsystematicreviewofcoagulationdisbalancesincovid1941studiesand17601patients