Cargando…
The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4 |
_version_ | 1784677927692009472 |
---|---|
author | Goldstein, Carly M. Goldstein, Stephanie P. Thomas, Diana M. Hoover, Adam Bond, Dale S. Thomas, J. Graham |
author_facet | Goldstein, Carly M. Goldstein, Stephanie P. Thomas, Diana M. Hoover, Adam Bond, Dale S. Thomas, J. Graham |
author_sort | Goldstein, Carly M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 12-week online behavioral weight loss program with 12 weeks of continued contact (n = 9; base program), the base program plus a graph of their actual and predicted weight change based on individualized physiological parameters (n = 7), or the base program, graph, and a Bite Counter device for monitoring and limiting eating (n = 8). Participants attended weekly clinic weigh-ins plus baseline, midway (12 weeks), and study culmination (24 weeks) assessments of feasibility, acceptability, weight, and behavioral outcomes. In terms of feasibility, participants completed online lessons (M = 7.04 of 12 possible lessons, SD = 4.02) and attended weigh-ins (M = 16.81 visits, SD = 7.24). Six-month retention appears highest among nomogram participants, and weigh-in attendance and lesson completion appear highest in Bite Counter participants. Acceptability was sufficient across groups. Bite Counter use (days with ≥ 2 eating episodes) was moderate (47.8%) and comparable to other studies. Participants lost 4.6% ± 4.5 of their initial body weight at 12 weeks and 4.5% ± 5.8 at 24 weeks. All conditions increased their total physical activity minutes and use of weight control strategies (behavioral outcomes). Although all groups lost weight and the study procedures were feasible, acceptability can be improved with advances in the technology. Participants were satisfied with the online program and nomograms, and future research on engagement, adherence, and integration with other owned devices is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02857595 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8963133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89631332022-03-29 The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program Goldstein, Carly M. Goldstein, Stephanie P. Thomas, Diana M. Hoover, Adam Bond, Dale S. Thomas, J. Graham J Technol Behav Sci Article This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 12-week online behavioral weight loss program with 12 weeks of continued contact (n = 9; base program), the base program plus a graph of their actual and predicted weight change based on individualized physiological parameters (n = 7), or the base program, graph, and a Bite Counter device for monitoring and limiting eating (n = 8). Participants attended weekly clinic weigh-ins plus baseline, midway (12 weeks), and study culmination (24 weeks) assessments of feasibility, acceptability, weight, and behavioral outcomes. In terms of feasibility, participants completed online lessons (M = 7.04 of 12 possible lessons, SD = 4.02) and attended weigh-ins (M = 16.81 visits, SD = 7.24). Six-month retention appears highest among nomogram participants, and weigh-in attendance and lesson completion appear highest in Bite Counter participants. Acceptability was sufficient across groups. Bite Counter use (days with ≥ 2 eating episodes) was moderate (47.8%) and comparable to other studies. Participants lost 4.6% ± 4.5 of their initial body weight at 12 weeks and 4.5% ± 5.8 at 24 weeks. All conditions increased their total physical activity minutes and use of weight control strategies (behavioral outcomes). Although all groups lost weight and the study procedures were feasible, acceptability can be improved with advances in the technology. Participants were satisfied with the online program and nomograms, and future research on engagement, adherence, and integration with other owned devices is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02857595 2021-06 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8963133/ /pubmed/35356149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Goldstein, Carly M. Goldstein, Stephanie P. Thomas, Diana M. Hoover, Adam Bond, Dale S. Thomas, J. Graham The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title | The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title_full | The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title_fullStr | The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title_full_unstemmed | The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title_short | The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program |
title_sort | behavioral intervention with technology for e-weight loss study (bites): incorporating energy balance models and the bite counter into an online behavioral weight loss program |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldsteincarlym thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT goldsteinstephaniep thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT thomasdianam thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT hooveradam thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT bonddales thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT thomasjgraham thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT goldsteincarlym behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT goldsteinstephaniep behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT thomasdianam behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT hooveradam behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT bonddales behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram AT thomasjgraham behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram |