Cargando…

The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program

This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldstein, Carly M., Goldstein, Stephanie P., Thomas, Diana M., Hoover, Adam, Bond, Dale S., Thomas, J. Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4
_version_ 1784677927692009472
author Goldstein, Carly M.
Goldstein, Stephanie P.
Thomas, Diana M.
Hoover, Adam
Bond, Dale S.
Thomas, J. Graham
author_facet Goldstein, Carly M.
Goldstein, Stephanie P.
Thomas, Diana M.
Hoover, Adam
Bond, Dale S.
Thomas, J. Graham
author_sort Goldstein, Carly M.
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 12-week online behavioral weight loss program with 12 weeks of continued contact (n = 9; base program), the base program plus a graph of their actual and predicted weight change based on individualized physiological parameters (n = 7), or the base program, graph, and a Bite Counter device for monitoring and limiting eating (n = 8). Participants attended weekly clinic weigh-ins plus baseline, midway (12 weeks), and study culmination (24 weeks) assessments of feasibility, acceptability, weight, and behavioral outcomes. In terms of feasibility, participants completed online lessons (M = 7.04 of 12 possible lessons, SD = 4.02) and attended weigh-ins (M = 16.81 visits, SD = 7.24). Six-month retention appears highest among nomogram participants, and weigh-in attendance and lesson completion appear highest in Bite Counter participants. Acceptability was sufficient across groups. Bite Counter use (days with ≥ 2 eating episodes) was moderate (47.8%) and comparable to other studies. Participants lost 4.6% ± 4.5 of their initial body weight at 12 weeks and 4.5% ± 5.8 at 24 weeks. All conditions increased their total physical activity minutes and use of weight control strategies (behavioral outcomes). Although all groups lost weight and the study procedures were feasible, acceptability can be improved with advances in the technology. Participants were satisfied with the online program and nomograms, and future research on engagement, adherence, and integration with other owned devices is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02857595
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8963133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89631332022-03-29 The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program Goldstein, Carly M. Goldstein, Stephanie P. Thomas, Diana M. Hoover, Adam Bond, Dale S. Thomas, J. Graham J Technol Behav Sci Article This study evaluated feasibility and acceptability of adding energy balance modeling displayed on weight graphs combined with a wrist-worn bite counting sensor against a traditional online behavioral weight loss program. Adults with a BMI of 27–45 kg/m(2) (83.3% women) were randomized to receive a 12-week online behavioral weight loss program with 12 weeks of continued contact (n = 9; base program), the base program plus a graph of their actual and predicted weight change based on individualized physiological parameters (n = 7), or the base program, graph, and a Bite Counter device for monitoring and limiting eating (n = 8). Participants attended weekly clinic weigh-ins plus baseline, midway (12 weeks), and study culmination (24 weeks) assessments of feasibility, acceptability, weight, and behavioral outcomes. In terms of feasibility, participants completed online lessons (M = 7.04 of 12 possible lessons, SD = 4.02) and attended weigh-ins (M = 16.81 visits, SD = 7.24). Six-month retention appears highest among nomogram participants, and weigh-in attendance and lesson completion appear highest in Bite Counter participants. Acceptability was sufficient across groups. Bite Counter use (days with ≥ 2 eating episodes) was moderate (47.8%) and comparable to other studies. Participants lost 4.6% ± 4.5 of their initial body weight at 12 weeks and 4.5% ± 5.8 at 24 weeks. All conditions increased their total physical activity minutes and use of weight control strategies (behavioral outcomes). Although all groups lost weight and the study procedures were feasible, acceptability can be improved with advances in the technology. Participants were satisfied with the online program and nomograms, and future research on engagement, adherence, and integration with other owned devices is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02857595 2021-06 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8963133/ /pubmed/35356149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Goldstein, Carly M.
Goldstein, Stephanie P.
Thomas, Diana M.
Hoover, Adam
Bond, Dale S.
Thomas, J. Graham
The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title_full The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title_fullStr The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title_full_unstemmed The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title_short The Behavioral Intervention with Technology for E-Weight Loss Study (BITES): Incorporating Energy Balance Models and the Bite Counter into an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program
title_sort behavioral intervention with technology for e-weight loss study (bites): incorporating energy balance models and the bite counter into an online behavioral weight loss program
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00181-4
work_keys_str_mv AT goldsteincarlym thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT goldsteinstephaniep thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT thomasdianam thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT hooveradam thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT bonddales thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT thomasjgraham thebehavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT goldsteincarlym behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT goldsteinstephaniep behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT thomasdianam behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT hooveradam behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT bonddales behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram
AT thomasjgraham behavioralinterventionwithtechnologyforeweightlossstudybitesincorporatingenergybalancemodelsandthebitecounterintoanonlinebehavioralweightlossprogram