Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation

BACKGROUND: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 led to a steep rise in transmissions. Recently, as public tolerance for isolation abated, CDC guidance on duration of at-home isolation of COVID-19 cases was shortened to five days if no symptoms, with no lab test requirement, despite more cautious appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maya, Sigal, Kahn, James G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.21.22272687
_version_ 1784678044714139648
author Maya, Sigal
Kahn, James G.
author_facet Maya, Sigal
Kahn, James G.
author_sort Maya, Sigal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 led to a steep rise in transmissions. Recently, as public tolerance for isolation abated, CDC guidance on duration of at-home isolation of COVID-19 cases was shortened to five days if no symptoms, with no lab test requirement, despite more cautious approaches advocated by other federal experts. METHODS: We conducted a decision tree analysis of alternative protocols for ending COVID-19 isolation, estimating net costs (direct and productivity), secondary infections, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of input uncertainty. RESULTS: Per 100 individuals, five-day isolation had 23 predicted secondary infections and a net cost of $33,000. Symptom check on day five (CDC guidance) yielded a 23% decrease in secondary infections (to 17.8), with a net cost of $45,000. Antigen testing on day six yielded 2.9 secondary infections and $63,000 in net costs. This protocol, compared to the next best protocol of antigen testing on day five of a maximum eight-day isolation, cost an additional $1,300 per secondary infection averted. Antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing on day five were dominated (more expensive and less effective) versus antigen testing on day six. Results were qualitatively robust to uncertainty in key inputs. CONCLUSIONS: A six-day isolation with antigen testing to confirm the absence of contagious virus appears the most effective and cost-effective de-isolation protocol to shorten at-home isolation of individuals with COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8963687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89636872022-03-30 Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation Maya, Sigal Kahn, James G. medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 led to a steep rise in transmissions. Recently, as public tolerance for isolation abated, CDC guidance on duration of at-home isolation of COVID-19 cases was shortened to five days if no symptoms, with no lab test requirement, despite more cautious approaches advocated by other federal experts. METHODS: We conducted a decision tree analysis of alternative protocols for ending COVID-19 isolation, estimating net costs (direct and productivity), secondary infections, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of input uncertainty. RESULTS: Per 100 individuals, five-day isolation had 23 predicted secondary infections and a net cost of $33,000. Symptom check on day five (CDC guidance) yielded a 23% decrease in secondary infections (to 17.8), with a net cost of $45,000. Antigen testing on day six yielded 2.9 secondary infections and $63,000 in net costs. This protocol, compared to the next best protocol of antigen testing on day five of a maximum eight-day isolation, cost an additional $1,300 per secondary infection averted. Antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing on day five were dominated (more expensive and less effective) versus antigen testing on day six. Results were qualitatively robust to uncertainty in key inputs. CONCLUSIONS: A six-day isolation with antigen testing to confirm the absence of contagious virus appears the most effective and cost-effective de-isolation protocol to shorten at-home isolation of individuals with COVID-19. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8963687/ /pubmed/35350204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.21.22272687 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Maya, Sigal
Kahn, James G.
Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title_full Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title_short Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation
title_sort cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending covid-19 isolation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.21.22272687
work_keys_str_mv AT mayasigal costeffectivenessofantigentestingforendingcovid19isolation
AT kahnjamesg costeffectivenessofantigentestingforendingcovid19isolation