Cargando…

A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of a low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol diet (LFD) vs psyllium on the frequency and severity of fecal incontinence (FI) episodes in patients with loose stools. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menees, Stacy B., Jackson, Kenya, Baker, Jason R., Fenner, Dee E., Eswaran, Shanti, Nojkov, Borko, Saad, Richard, Lee, Allen A., Chey, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060943
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000454
_version_ 1784678080277643264
author Menees, Stacy B.
Jackson, Kenya
Baker, Jason R.
Fenner, Dee E.
Eswaran, Shanti
Nojkov, Borko
Saad, Richard
Lee, Allen A.
Chey, William D.
author_facet Menees, Stacy B.
Jackson, Kenya
Baker, Jason R.
Fenner, Dee E.
Eswaran, Shanti
Nojkov, Borko
Saad, Richard
Lee, Allen A.
Chey, William D.
author_sort Menees, Stacy B.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of a low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol diet (LFD) vs psyllium on the frequency and severity of fecal incontinence (FI) episodes in patients with loose stools. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized pilot trial of adult patients with FI (Rome III) with at least 1 weekly FI episode associated with loose stool. Eligible patients were randomized to 4 weeks of either a dietitian-led LFD or 6 g/d psyllium treatment. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were randomized from October 2014 to May 2019. Thirty-seven patients completed the study (19 LFD and 18 psyllium). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of treatment responders (>50% reduction in FI episodes compared with baseline) for treatment weeks 1–4 (LFD 38.9%, psyllium 50%, P = .33). Compared with baseline, mean fecal incontinence severity index score significantly improved with LFD (39.4 vs 32.6, P = .02) but not with psyllium (35.4 vs 32.1, P = .29). Compared with baseline values, the LFD group reported improvements in fecal incontinence quality of life coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment subscales. The psyllium group reported improvement in incontinence quality of life coping/behavior. DISCUSSION: In this pilot study, there was no difference in the proportion of patients who reported a 50% reduction of FI episodes with the LFD or psyllium. Subjects in the psyllium group reported a greater reduction in overall FI episodes, whereas the LFD group reported consistent improvements in FI severity and quality of life. Further work to understand these apparently discrepant results are warranted but the LFD and psyllium seem to provide viable treatment options for patients with FI and loose stools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8963855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89638552022-03-30 A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools Menees, Stacy B. Jackson, Kenya Baker, Jason R. Fenner, Dee E. Eswaran, Shanti Nojkov, Borko Saad, Richard Lee, Allen A. Chey, William D. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of a low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol diet (LFD) vs psyllium on the frequency and severity of fecal incontinence (FI) episodes in patients with loose stools. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized pilot trial of adult patients with FI (Rome III) with at least 1 weekly FI episode associated with loose stool. Eligible patients were randomized to 4 weeks of either a dietitian-led LFD or 6 g/d psyllium treatment. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were randomized from October 2014 to May 2019. Thirty-seven patients completed the study (19 LFD and 18 psyllium). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of treatment responders (>50% reduction in FI episodes compared with baseline) for treatment weeks 1–4 (LFD 38.9%, psyllium 50%, P = .33). Compared with baseline, mean fecal incontinence severity index score significantly improved with LFD (39.4 vs 32.6, P = .02) but not with psyllium (35.4 vs 32.1, P = .29). Compared with baseline values, the LFD group reported improvements in fecal incontinence quality of life coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment subscales. The psyllium group reported improvement in incontinence quality of life coping/behavior. DISCUSSION: In this pilot study, there was no difference in the proportion of patients who reported a 50% reduction of FI episodes with the LFD or psyllium. Subjects in the psyllium group reported a greater reduction in overall FI episodes, whereas the LFD group reported consistent improvements in FI severity and quality of life. Further work to understand these apparently discrepant results are warranted but the LFD and psyllium seem to provide viable treatment options for patients with FI and loose stools. Wolters Kluwer 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8963855/ /pubmed/35060943 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000454 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Menees, Stacy B.
Jackson, Kenya
Baker, Jason R.
Fenner, Dee E.
Eswaran, Shanti
Nojkov, Borko
Saad, Richard
Lee, Allen A.
Chey, William D.
A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title_full A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title_fullStr A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title_short A Randomized Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Low FODMAP Diet vs Psyllium in Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Loose Stools
title_sort randomized pilot study to compare the effectiveness of a low fodmap diet vs psyllium in patients with fecal incontinence and loose stools
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060943
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000454
work_keys_str_mv AT meneesstacyb arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT jacksonkenya arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT bakerjasonr arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT fennerdeee arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT eswaranshanti arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT nojkovborko arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT saadrichard arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT leeallena arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT cheywilliamd arandomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT meneesstacyb randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT jacksonkenya randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT bakerjasonr randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT fennerdeee randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT eswaranshanti randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT nojkovborko randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT saadrichard randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT leeallena randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools
AT cheywilliamd randomizedpilotstudytocomparetheeffectivenessofalowfodmapdietvspsylliuminpatientswithfecalincontinenceandloosestools