Cargando…

Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairments are a common and significant issue for young people with a severe mental illness. Young people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression all experience significant cognitive problems that impede their ability to return to work or study. These neuro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Anthony W. F., Kightley, Michelle, Williams, Joanna, Ma, Cassandra, Dodds, Carlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789628
_version_ 1784678207613566976
author Harris, Anthony W. F.
Kightley, Michelle
Williams, Joanna
Ma, Cassandra
Dodds, Carlie
author_facet Harris, Anthony W. F.
Kightley, Michelle
Williams, Joanna
Ma, Cassandra
Dodds, Carlie
author_sort Harris, Anthony W. F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairments are a common and significant issue for young people with a severe mental illness. Young people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression all experience significant cognitive problems that impede their ability to return to work or study. These neurocognitive problems are frequently exacerbated by social cognitive deficits that interfere with their ability to integrate into the community and understand the social and emotional nuances about them. This study aimed to assess if the addition of a social cognitive remediation treatment to a neurocognitive remediation therapy improved functional outcome. METHODS: Five youth mental health services were trained in both the Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) and the Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) treatments. Participants were randomised between receiving either NEAR + SCIT or NEAR + treatment as usual (TAU) over a 20-week period, with all participants receiving the NEAR treatment first. Symptoms, neurocognition, social cognition and functioning were examined at baseline, end of treatment and at 3 months follow-up and compared between the two arms of the study. The primary outcome was function. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants were randomised to treatment (Schizophrenia spectrum = 28, Bipolar disorder = 7, Major Depression = 2). The trial was curtailed by Covid-related service restrictions. There was an overall significant improvement in function over time with a trend towards a greater improvement in the NEAR + SCIT arm. No changes in symptoms, neurocognitive or social cognitive measures were seen. While 74% completed treatment only 49% agreed to follow up at 3 months affecting our ability to interpret the findings. Attrition did not differ by arm. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic, service-based research project, treatment aimed at improving cognition enhanced functional outcome in young people with a range of severe mental illnesses. There was a trend towards improved function in young people who had a combined NEAR + SCIT approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifier: ACTRN12622000192785.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89643962022-03-31 Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial Harris, Anthony W. F. Kightley, Michelle Williams, Joanna Ma, Cassandra Dodds, Carlie Front Psychiatry Psychiatry INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairments are a common and significant issue for young people with a severe mental illness. Young people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression all experience significant cognitive problems that impede their ability to return to work or study. These neurocognitive problems are frequently exacerbated by social cognitive deficits that interfere with their ability to integrate into the community and understand the social and emotional nuances about them. This study aimed to assess if the addition of a social cognitive remediation treatment to a neurocognitive remediation therapy improved functional outcome. METHODS: Five youth mental health services were trained in both the Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) and the Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) treatments. Participants were randomised between receiving either NEAR + SCIT or NEAR + treatment as usual (TAU) over a 20-week period, with all participants receiving the NEAR treatment first. Symptoms, neurocognition, social cognition and functioning were examined at baseline, end of treatment and at 3 months follow-up and compared between the two arms of the study. The primary outcome was function. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants were randomised to treatment (Schizophrenia spectrum = 28, Bipolar disorder = 7, Major Depression = 2). The trial was curtailed by Covid-related service restrictions. There was an overall significant improvement in function over time with a trend towards a greater improvement in the NEAR + SCIT arm. No changes in symptoms, neurocognitive or social cognitive measures were seen. While 74% completed treatment only 49% agreed to follow up at 3 months affecting our ability to interpret the findings. Attrition did not differ by arm. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic, service-based research project, treatment aimed at improving cognition enhanced functional outcome in young people with a range of severe mental illnesses. There was a trend towards improved function in young people who had a combined NEAR + SCIT approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifier: ACTRN12622000192785. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8964396/ /pubmed/35368729 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789628 Text en Copyright © 2022 Harris, Kightley, Williams, Ma and Dodds. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Harris, Anthony W. F.
Kightley, Michelle
Williams, Joanna
Ma, Cassandra
Dodds, Carlie
Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title_full Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title_fullStr Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title_full_unstemmed Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title_short Does Adding Social Cognitive Remediation Therapy to Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy Improve Outcomes in Young People With a Severe Mental Illness?—The Advantage Trial
title_sort does adding social cognitive remediation therapy to neurocognitive remediation therapy improve outcomes in young people with a severe mental illness?—the advantage trial
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789628
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisanthonywf doesaddingsocialcognitiveremediationtherapytoneurocognitiveremediationtherapyimproveoutcomesinyoungpeoplewithaseverementalillnesstheadvantagetrial
AT kightleymichelle doesaddingsocialcognitiveremediationtherapytoneurocognitiveremediationtherapyimproveoutcomesinyoungpeoplewithaseverementalillnesstheadvantagetrial
AT williamsjoanna doesaddingsocialcognitiveremediationtherapytoneurocognitiveremediationtherapyimproveoutcomesinyoungpeoplewithaseverementalillnesstheadvantagetrial
AT macassandra doesaddingsocialcognitiveremediationtherapytoneurocognitiveremediationtherapyimproveoutcomesinyoungpeoplewithaseverementalillnesstheadvantagetrial
AT doddscarlie doesaddingsocialcognitiveremediationtherapytoneurocognitiveremediationtherapyimproveoutcomesinyoungpeoplewithaseverementalillnesstheadvantagetrial