Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known about the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jegerlehner, Sabrina, Suter-Riniker, Franziska, Jent, Philipp, Bittel, Pascal, Nagler, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35364282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.037
_version_ 1784678220474351616
author Jegerlehner, Sabrina
Suter-Riniker, Franziska
Jent, Philipp
Bittel, Pascal
Nagler, Michael
author_facet Jegerlehner, Sabrina
Suter-Riniker, Franziska
Jent, Philipp
Bittel, Pascal
Nagler, Michael
author_sort Jegerlehner, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known about the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/secondary care testing facility. METHODS: Individuals who presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated with a Swiss university hospital were prospectively recruited (n=377). Saliva specimen was obtained, and the PCL Inc. COVID19 Gold antigen test was conducted in parallel with 2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays from a nasopharyngeal swab. RESULTS: RT-PCR results were positive in 53 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 14.1% (missing material in 1 individual). The PCL saliva antigen test was positive in 22 individuals (5.8%) and negative in 354 (93.9%). The sensitivity of the saliva antigen test was 30.2% (95% confidence interval 18.3, 44.3), both overall and in symptomatic individuals. The specificity was 98.1% (96.0, 99.3). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test in a primary/secondary care testing facility was remarkably lower than that reported in the manufacturer's specifications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89644462022-03-30 Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting Jegerlehner, Sabrina Suter-Riniker, Franziska Jent, Philipp Bittel, Pascal Nagler, Michael Int J Infect Dis Short Communications BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known about the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/secondary care testing facility. METHODS: Individuals who presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated with a Swiss university hospital were prospectively recruited (n=377). Saliva specimen was obtained, and the PCL Inc. COVID19 Gold antigen test was conducted in parallel with 2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays from a nasopharyngeal swab. RESULTS: RT-PCR results were positive in 53 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 14.1% (missing material in 1 individual). The PCL saliva antigen test was positive in 22 individuals (5.8%) and negative in 354 (93.9%). The sensitivity of the saliva antigen test was 30.2% (95% confidence interval 18.3, 44.3), both overall and in symptomatic individuals. The specificity was 98.1% (96.0, 99.3). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test in a primary/secondary care testing facility was remarkably lower than that reported in the manufacturer's specifications. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022-06 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8964446/ /pubmed/35364282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.037 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Jegerlehner, Sabrina
Suter-Riniker, Franziska
Jent, Philipp
Bittel, Pascal
Nagler, Michael
Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of sars-cov-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35364282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.037
work_keys_str_mv AT jegerlehnersabrina diagnosticaccuracyofsarscov2salivaantigentestinginareallifeclinicalsetting
AT suterrinikerfranziska diagnosticaccuracyofsarscov2salivaantigentestinginareallifeclinicalsetting
AT jentphilipp diagnosticaccuracyofsarscov2salivaantigentestinginareallifeclinicalsetting
AT bittelpascal diagnosticaccuracyofsarscov2salivaantigentestinginareallifeclinicalsetting
AT naglermichael diagnosticaccuracyofsarscov2salivaantigentestinginareallifeclinicalsetting