Cargando…

On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks

Who is a native signer? Since around 95% of deaf infants are born into a hearing family, deaf signers are exposed to a sign language at various moments of their life, and not only from birth. Moreover, the linguistic input they are exposed to is not always a fully fledged natural sign language. In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zorzi, Giorgia, Giustolisi, Beatrice, Aristodemo, Valentina, Cecchetto, Carlo, Hauser, Charlotte, Quer, Josep, Sánchez Amat, Jordina, Donati, Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716554
_version_ 1784678222687895552
author Zorzi, Giorgia
Giustolisi, Beatrice
Aristodemo, Valentina
Cecchetto, Carlo
Hauser, Charlotte
Quer, Josep
Sánchez Amat, Jordina
Donati, Caterina
author_facet Zorzi, Giorgia
Giustolisi, Beatrice
Aristodemo, Valentina
Cecchetto, Carlo
Hauser, Charlotte
Quer, Josep
Sánchez Amat, Jordina
Donati, Caterina
author_sort Zorzi, Giorgia
collection PubMed
description Who is a native signer? Since around 95% of deaf infants are born into a hearing family, deaf signers are exposed to a sign language at various moments of their life, and not only from birth. Moreover, the linguistic input they are exposed to is not always a fully fledged natural sign language. In this situation, is the notion of native signer as someone exposed to language from birth of any use? We review the results of the first large-scale cross-linguistic investigation on the effects of age of exposure to sign language. This research involved about 45 Deaf adult signers in each of three sign languages (Catalan Sign Language, French Sign Language, and Italian Sign Language). Across the three languages, participants were divided into three groups – those exposed from birth, those between 1 and 5 years of age, and those exposed between 6 and 15 years of age – and received a battery of tests designed for each language targeting various aspects of morphosyntactic competence. In particular, the tests focused on both those morphosyntactic phenomena that are known from the spoken language literature to be good detectors of language impairment or delay (i.e., wh-interrogatives and relative clauses) and on morphosyntactic phenomena that are sign language specific (i.e., role shift and directional verbs). The results showed a clear effect of being native, with significant differences across languages and tests between signers exposed to sign language from birth and those exposed in the 1st years of life. This confirms the life-long importance of language exposure from birth and the reliability of the notion of “nativeness”, at least for syntax. On the other hand, while in most domains the differences observed between populations might be differences in performance, for some specific constructions, signers belonging to the three groups may have different grammars. This latter finding challenges the generalized use of native signers’ grammar as the baseline for language description and language assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89644542022-03-31 On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks Zorzi, Giorgia Giustolisi, Beatrice Aristodemo, Valentina Cecchetto, Carlo Hauser, Charlotte Quer, Josep Sánchez Amat, Jordina Donati, Caterina Front Psychol Psychology Who is a native signer? Since around 95% of deaf infants are born into a hearing family, deaf signers are exposed to a sign language at various moments of their life, and not only from birth. Moreover, the linguistic input they are exposed to is not always a fully fledged natural sign language. In this situation, is the notion of native signer as someone exposed to language from birth of any use? We review the results of the first large-scale cross-linguistic investigation on the effects of age of exposure to sign language. This research involved about 45 Deaf adult signers in each of three sign languages (Catalan Sign Language, French Sign Language, and Italian Sign Language). Across the three languages, participants were divided into three groups – those exposed from birth, those between 1 and 5 years of age, and those exposed between 6 and 15 years of age – and received a battery of tests designed for each language targeting various aspects of morphosyntactic competence. In particular, the tests focused on both those morphosyntactic phenomena that are known from the spoken language literature to be good detectors of language impairment or delay (i.e., wh-interrogatives and relative clauses) and on morphosyntactic phenomena that are sign language specific (i.e., role shift and directional verbs). The results showed a clear effect of being native, with significant differences across languages and tests between signers exposed to sign language from birth and those exposed in the 1st years of life. This confirms the life-long importance of language exposure from birth and the reliability of the notion of “nativeness”, at least for syntax. On the other hand, while in most domains the differences observed between populations might be differences in performance, for some specific constructions, signers belonging to the three groups may have different grammars. This latter finding challenges the generalized use of native signers’ grammar as the baseline for language description and language assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8964454/ /pubmed/35369221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716554 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zorzi, Giustolisi, Aristodemo, Cecchetto, Hauser, Quer, Sánchez Amat and Donati. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zorzi, Giorgia
Giustolisi, Beatrice
Aristodemo, Valentina
Cecchetto, Carlo
Hauser, Charlotte
Quer, Josep
Sánchez Amat, Jordina
Donati, Caterina
On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title_full On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title_fullStr On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title_full_unstemmed On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title_short On the Reliability of the Notion of Native Signer and Its Risks
title_sort on the reliability of the notion of native signer and its risks
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.716554
work_keys_str_mv AT zorzigiorgia onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT giustolisibeatrice onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT aristodemovalentina onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT cecchettocarlo onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT hausercharlotte onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT querjosep onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT sanchezamatjordina onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks
AT donaticaterina onthereliabilityofthenotionofnativesigneranditsrisks