Cargando…

Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (V(T)) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Renata R., Ambrósio, Aline M., Engbruch, Aline M., Gonçalves, Lucas A., Villela, Paula A., Sanchez, Ana F., Fantoni, Denise T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613
_version_ 1784678259953238016
author Rodrigues, Renata R.
Ambrósio, Aline M.
Engbruch, Aline M.
Gonçalves, Lucas A.
Villela, Paula A.
Sanchez, Ana F.
Fantoni, Denise T.
author_facet Rodrigues, Renata R.
Ambrósio, Aline M.
Engbruch, Aline M.
Gonçalves, Lucas A.
Villela, Paula A.
Sanchez, Ana F.
Fantoni, Denise T.
author_sort Rodrigues, Renata R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (V(T)) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: Twenty-one healthy client-owned mesocephalic healthy dogs, 1–7 years old, weighing 10–20 kg, and body condition scores 4–6/9 admitted for periodontal treatment. METHODS: Isoflurane-anesthetized dogs in dorsal recumbency were ventilated until 1 h with a volume-controlled ventilation mode using 8 mL kg(−1) of V(T). The dogs were distributed in 2 groups: in the ARM group, PEEP starts in 0 cmH(2)O, increasing gradually 5 cmH(2)O every 3 min, until reach 15 cmH(2)O and decreasing in the same steps until 5 cmH(2)O, maintaining this value until the end; and PEEP group, in which the pressure 5 cmH(2)O was instituted from the beginning of anesthesia and maintained the same level up to the end of the anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary, metabolic, oxygenation parameters, and respiratory mechanics were recorded after the anesthesia induction (baseline—BL), 15, 45, and 75 min after BL and during the recovery. RESULTS: The ARM increased the static compliance (C(st)) (15 min after baseline) when compared with baseline moment (24.9 ± 5.8 mL cmH(2)0(−1) vs. 20.7 ± 5.4 mL cmH(2)0(−1)–p = 0.0364), oxygenation index (PaO(2)/FIO(2)) (505.6 ± 59.2 mmHg vs. 461.2 ± 41.0 mmHg—p = 0.0453) and reduced the shunt fraction (3.4 ± 2.4% vs. 5.5 ± 1.6%—p = 0.062). In the PEEP group, no statistical differences were observed concerning the variables evaluated. At the beginning of the evaluation, the driving pressure (DP) before ARM was significantly greater than all other evaluation time points (6.9 ± 1.8 cmH(2)0). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 8 mL kg(−1) of V(T) and 5 cmH(2)0 PEEP without ARM maintain adequate oxygenation and mechanical ventilation in dental surgeries for up to 1 h. The use of ARM slightly improved compliance and oxygenation during the maneuver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89646282022-03-31 Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial Rodrigues, Renata R. Ambrósio, Aline M. Engbruch, Aline M. Gonçalves, Lucas A. Villela, Paula A. Sanchez, Ana F. Fantoni, Denise T. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic impact of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (V(T)) in dogs with the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or preceded by alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: Twenty-one healthy client-owned mesocephalic healthy dogs, 1–7 years old, weighing 10–20 kg, and body condition scores 4–6/9 admitted for periodontal treatment. METHODS: Isoflurane-anesthetized dogs in dorsal recumbency were ventilated until 1 h with a volume-controlled ventilation mode using 8 mL kg(−1) of V(T). The dogs were distributed in 2 groups: in the ARM group, PEEP starts in 0 cmH(2)O, increasing gradually 5 cmH(2)O every 3 min, until reach 15 cmH(2)O and decreasing in the same steps until 5 cmH(2)O, maintaining this value until the end; and PEEP group, in which the pressure 5 cmH(2)O was instituted from the beginning of anesthesia and maintained the same level up to the end of the anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary, metabolic, oxygenation parameters, and respiratory mechanics were recorded after the anesthesia induction (baseline—BL), 15, 45, and 75 min after BL and during the recovery. RESULTS: The ARM increased the static compliance (C(st)) (15 min after baseline) when compared with baseline moment (24.9 ± 5.8 mL cmH(2)0(−1) vs. 20.7 ± 5.4 mL cmH(2)0(−1)–p = 0.0364), oxygenation index (PaO(2)/FIO(2)) (505.6 ± 59.2 mmHg vs. 461.2 ± 41.0 mmHg—p = 0.0453) and reduced the shunt fraction (3.4 ± 2.4% vs. 5.5 ± 1.6%—p = 0.062). In the PEEP group, no statistical differences were observed concerning the variables evaluated. At the beginning of the evaluation, the driving pressure (DP) before ARM was significantly greater than all other evaluation time points (6.9 ± 1.8 cmH(2)0). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 8 mL kg(−1) of V(T) and 5 cmH(2)0 PEEP without ARM maintain adequate oxygenation and mechanical ventilation in dental surgeries for up to 1 h. The use of ARM slightly improved compliance and oxygenation during the maneuver. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8964628/ /pubmed/35372547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rodrigues, Ambrósio, Engbruch, Gonçalves, Villela, Sanchez and Fantoni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Rodrigues, Renata R.
Ambrósio, Aline M.
Engbruch, Aline M.
Gonçalves, Lucas A.
Villela, Paula A.
Sanchez, Ana F.
Fantoni, Denise T.
Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation in dogs: a randomized clinical trial
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.842613
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesrenatar intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ambrosioalinem intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT engbruchalinem intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT goncalveslucasa intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT villelapaulaa intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sanchezanaf intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fantonideniset intraoperativeprotectivemechanicalventilationindogsarandomizedclinicaltrial