Cargando…

Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors

PURPOSE: Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Stephen L., Fisher, Peter, Hope-Stone, Laura, Damato, Bertil, Heimann, Heinrich, Hussain, Rumana, Cherry, M. Gemma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4
_version_ 1784678263804657664
author Brown, Stephen L.
Fisher, Peter
Hope-Stone, Laura
Damato, Bertil
Heimann, Heinrich
Hussain, Rumana
Cherry, M. Gemma
author_facet Brown, Stephen L.
Fisher, Peter
Hope-Stone, Laura
Damato, Bertil
Heimann, Heinrich
Hussain, Rumana
Cherry, M. Gemma
author_sort Brown, Stephen L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told that life expectancy is either normal (good prognosis) or severely curtailed because of metastatic disease (poor prognosis). Treatment cannot change life expectancy. To identify whether prognosis is associated with psychological harm, we compared harm in UM survivors with good and poor prognoses and those who declined testing and compared these outcomes to general population norms. METHODS: Non-randomized 5-year study of a consecutive series of 708 UM survivors (51.6% male, mean age 69.03, SD=12.12) with observations at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. We operationalized psychological harm as anxiety and depression symptoms, worry about cancer recurrence (WREC) and poor quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Compared to other groups, survivors with poor prognoses showed initially elevated anxiety and depression and consistently elevated worry about local or distant recurrence over 5 years. Good prognoses were not associated with outcomes. Generally, no prognostic groups reported anxiety, depression and WREC or QoL scores that exceeded general population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large sample, we found that harm accruing from a poor prognosis was statistically significant over 5 years, but did not exceed general non-cancer population norms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors desire prognostic information. At a population level, we do not believe that our findings show sufficiently strong links between prognostication outcome and psychological harm to deny patients the option of knowing their prognosis. Nonetheless, it is important that patients are informed of potential adverse psychological consequences of a poor prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89646472022-04-07 Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors Brown, Stephen L. Fisher, Peter Hope-Stone, Laura Damato, Bertil Heimann, Heinrich Hussain, Rumana Cherry, M. Gemma J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told that life expectancy is either normal (good prognosis) or severely curtailed because of metastatic disease (poor prognosis). Treatment cannot change life expectancy. To identify whether prognosis is associated with psychological harm, we compared harm in UM survivors with good and poor prognoses and those who declined testing and compared these outcomes to general population norms. METHODS: Non-randomized 5-year study of a consecutive series of 708 UM survivors (51.6% male, mean age 69.03, SD=12.12) with observations at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. We operationalized psychological harm as anxiety and depression symptoms, worry about cancer recurrence (WREC) and poor quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Compared to other groups, survivors with poor prognoses showed initially elevated anxiety and depression and consistently elevated worry about local or distant recurrence over 5 years. Good prognoses were not associated with outcomes. Generally, no prognostic groups reported anxiety, depression and WREC or QoL scores that exceeded general population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large sample, we found that harm accruing from a poor prognosis was statistically significant over 5 years, but did not exceed general non-cancer population norms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors desire prognostic information. At a population level, we do not believe that our findings show sufficiently strong links between prognostication outcome and psychological harm to deny patients the option of knowing their prognosis. Nonetheless, it is important that patients are informed of potential adverse psychological consequences of a poor prognosis. Springer US 2021-04-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8964647/ /pubmed/33871760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Brown, Stephen L.
Fisher, Peter
Hope-Stone, Laura
Damato, Bertil
Heimann, Heinrich
Hussain, Rumana
Cherry, M. Gemma
Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title_full Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title_fullStr Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title_full_unstemmed Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title_short Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
title_sort is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brownstephenl isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT fisherpeter isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT hopestonelaura isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT damatobertil isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT heimannheinrich isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT hussainrumana isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors
AT cherrymgemma isaccurateroutinecancerprognosticationpsychologicallyharmful5yearoutcomesoflifeexpectancyprognosticationinuvealmelanomasurvivors