Cargando…

Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users

Cochlear implants (CIs) convey the amplitude envelope of speech by modulating high-rate pulse trains. However, not all of the envelope may be necessary to perceive amplitude modulations (AMs); the effective envelope depth may be limited by forward and backward masking from the envelope peaks. Three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monaghan, Jessica J. M., Carlyon, Robert P., Deeks, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00834-6
_version_ 1784678312638939136
author Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
Deeks, John M.
author_facet Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
Deeks, John M.
author_sort Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
collection PubMed
description Cochlear implants (CIs) convey the amplitude envelope of speech by modulating high-rate pulse trains. However, not all of the envelope may be necessary to perceive amplitude modulations (AMs); the effective envelope depth may be limited by forward and backward masking from the envelope peaks. Three experiments used modulated pulse trains to measure which portions of the envelope can be effectively processed by CI users as a function of AM frequency. Experiment 1 used a three-interval forced-choice task to test the ability of CI users to discriminate less-modulated pulse trains from a fully modulated standard, without controlling for loudness. The stimuli in experiment 2 were identical, but a two-interval task was used in which participants were required to choose the less-modulated interval, ignoring loudness. Catch trials, in which judgements based on level or modulation depth would give opposing answers, were included. Experiment 3 employed novel stimuli whose modulation envelope could be modified below a variable point in the dynamic range, without changing the loudness of the stimulus. Overall, results showed that substantial portions of the envelope are not accurately encoded by CI users. In experiment 1, where loudness cues were available, participants on average were insensitive to changes in the bottom 30% of their dynamic range. In experiment 2, where loudness was controlled, participants appeared insensitive to changes in the bottom 50% of the dynamic range. In experiment 3, participants were insensitive to changes in the bottom 80% of the dynamic range. We discuss potential reasons for this insensitivity and implications for CI speech-processing strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89648912022-04-12 Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users Monaghan, Jessica J. M. Carlyon, Robert P. Deeks, John M. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article Cochlear implants (CIs) convey the amplitude envelope of speech by modulating high-rate pulse trains. However, not all of the envelope may be necessary to perceive amplitude modulations (AMs); the effective envelope depth may be limited by forward and backward masking from the envelope peaks. Three experiments used modulated pulse trains to measure which portions of the envelope can be effectively processed by CI users as a function of AM frequency. Experiment 1 used a three-interval forced-choice task to test the ability of CI users to discriminate less-modulated pulse trains from a fully modulated standard, without controlling for loudness. The stimuli in experiment 2 were identical, but a two-interval task was used in which participants were required to choose the less-modulated interval, ignoring loudness. Catch trials, in which judgements based on level or modulation depth would give opposing answers, were included. Experiment 3 employed novel stimuli whose modulation envelope could be modified below a variable point in the dynamic range, without changing the loudness of the stimulus. Overall, results showed that substantial portions of the envelope are not accurately encoded by CI users. In experiment 1, where loudness cues were available, participants on average were insensitive to changes in the bottom 30% of their dynamic range. In experiment 2, where loudness was controlled, participants appeared insensitive to changes in the bottom 50% of the dynamic range. In experiment 3, participants were insensitive to changes in the bottom 80% of the dynamic range. We discuss potential reasons for this insensitivity and implications for CI speech-processing strategies. Springer US 2022-01-26 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8964891/ /pubmed/35080684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00834-6 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
Deeks, John M.
Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort modulation depth discrimination by cochlear implant users
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00834-6
work_keys_str_mv AT monaghanjessicajm modulationdepthdiscriminationbycochlearimplantusers
AT carlyonrobertp modulationdepthdiscriminationbycochlearimplantusers
AT deeksjohnm modulationdepthdiscriminationbycochlearimplantusers