Cargando…

Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis difficulties are common for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, leading to inadequate and inconsistent treatment. We evaluated the national and geographic variability in disease diagnosis and treatment in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deodhar, Atul, Kruzikas, Denise, Zhou, Lili, Biljan, Ana, Saffore, Christopher D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34927217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00406-9
_version_ 1784678313339387904
author Deodhar, Atul
Kruzikas, Denise
Zhou, Lili
Biljan, Ana
Saffore, Christopher D.
author_facet Deodhar, Atul
Kruzikas, Denise
Zhou, Lili
Biljan, Ana
Saffore, Christopher D.
author_sort Deodhar, Atul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis difficulties are common for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, leading to inadequate and inconsistent treatment. We evaluated the national and geographic variability in disease diagnosis and treatment in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis utilized the IBM® MarketScan® Administrative Claims Database from 2014 to 2019. AS patients ≥ 18 years of age with continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment during the calendar year and complete geographic information during the study period were included. Patient cohorts assessed were D1 (≥ 1 AS diagnoses within each calendar year of assessment between 2014 and 2019), D2 (≥ 2 non-rheumatologist AS diagnoses), and D3 (≥ 2 rheumatologist AS diagnoses). For D2 and D3, diagnoses were ≥ 6 months apart, but within 18 months. Annual AS diagnostic prevalence and treatment rates were determined from 2014 to 2019 nationally and per state in 2019. Treatments assessed were disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and methotrexate. RESULTS: Nationally, AS diagnostic prevalence increased from 2014 to 2019, with 2019 rates of 9.6 (D1), 5.1 (D2), and 3.5 (D3) per 10,000 persons. Diagnostic prevalence varied between states, which was not explained by age, sex, racial distribution, or rheumatologists per capita. Nationally, a greater percentage of D3 patients vs. D1 and D2 patients received biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARD/tsDMARDs) and conventional synthetic DMARD. Opioid use ranged from 37 to 40% in 2019 and decreased from 2014 for all cohorts. Corticosteroid and methotrexate use decreased slightly, while NSAID and bDMARD/tsDMARD use generally increased from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: AS diagnostic prevalence is increasing nationally, though it remains low among some states. bDMARD/tsDMARDs use was more common among patients treated by rheumatologists. Opioid and corticosteroid use is decreasing, though national rates remain high with significant state variability. Further education is needed, particularly in states with low prevalence and inadequate treatment, to improve diagnosis and treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00406-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8964895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89648952022-04-12 Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study Deodhar, Atul Kruzikas, Denise Zhou, Lili Biljan, Ana Saffore, Christopher D. Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis difficulties are common for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, leading to inadequate and inconsistent treatment. We evaluated the national and geographic variability in disease diagnosis and treatment in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis utilized the IBM® MarketScan® Administrative Claims Database from 2014 to 2019. AS patients ≥ 18 years of age with continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment during the calendar year and complete geographic information during the study period were included. Patient cohorts assessed were D1 (≥ 1 AS diagnoses within each calendar year of assessment between 2014 and 2019), D2 (≥ 2 non-rheumatologist AS diagnoses), and D3 (≥ 2 rheumatologist AS diagnoses). For D2 and D3, diagnoses were ≥ 6 months apart, but within 18 months. Annual AS diagnostic prevalence and treatment rates were determined from 2014 to 2019 nationally and per state in 2019. Treatments assessed were disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and methotrexate. RESULTS: Nationally, AS diagnostic prevalence increased from 2014 to 2019, with 2019 rates of 9.6 (D1), 5.1 (D2), and 3.5 (D3) per 10,000 persons. Diagnostic prevalence varied between states, which was not explained by age, sex, racial distribution, or rheumatologists per capita. Nationally, a greater percentage of D3 patients vs. D1 and D2 patients received biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARD/tsDMARDs) and conventional synthetic DMARD. Opioid use ranged from 37 to 40% in 2019 and decreased from 2014 for all cohorts. Corticosteroid and methotrexate use decreased slightly, while NSAID and bDMARD/tsDMARD use generally increased from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: AS diagnostic prevalence is increasing nationally, though it remains low among some states. bDMARD/tsDMARDs use was more common among patients treated by rheumatologists. Opioid and corticosteroid use is decreasing, though national rates remain high with significant state variability. Further education is needed, particularly in states with low prevalence and inadequate treatment, to improve diagnosis and treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00406-9. Springer Healthcare 2021-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8964895/ /pubmed/34927217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00406-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Deodhar, Atul
Kruzikas, Denise
Zhou, Lili
Biljan, Ana
Saffore, Christopher D.
Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title_full Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title_fullStr Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title_full_unstemmed Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title_short Geographic Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States: A Real-World Study
title_sort geographic variations in diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the united states: a real-world study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34927217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00406-9
work_keys_str_mv AT deodharatul geographicvariationsindiagnosisandtreatmentofankylosingspondylitisintheunitedstatesarealworldstudy
AT kruzikasdenise geographicvariationsindiagnosisandtreatmentofankylosingspondylitisintheunitedstatesarealworldstudy
AT zhoulili geographicvariationsindiagnosisandtreatmentofankylosingspondylitisintheunitedstatesarealworldstudy
AT biljanana geographicvariationsindiagnosisandtreatmentofankylosingspondylitisintheunitedstatesarealworldstudy
AT safforechristopherd geographicvariationsindiagnosisandtreatmentofankylosingspondylitisintheunitedstatesarealworldstudy