Cargando…
Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting
AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the potential intraprocedural benefits of the Proximal Side Optimization (PSO) technique by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). METHODS: A case series of 10 consecutive true bifurcation lesions, with severe long pathology of long side branch (SB), were rando...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.861129 |
_version_ | 1784678337638039552 |
---|---|
author | Lavarra, Francesco Tarantini, Giuseppe Sala, Davide Sirbu, Vasile |
author_facet | Lavarra, Francesco Tarantini, Giuseppe Sala, Davide Sirbu, Vasile |
author_sort | Lavarra, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the potential intraprocedural benefits of the Proximal Side Optimization (PSO) technique by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). METHODS: A case series of 10 consecutive true bifurcation lesions, with severe long pathology of long side branch (SB), were randomly assigned to be treated by standard DK Crush procedure (non-PSO group) as compared to DK Crush in PSO modification (PSO group). The data from OCT investigation before crushing of the SB Drug-Eluting Stent (DES), after crushing, after first kissing balloon inflation (KBI), and after final angiography were compared between the two groups (Public trials registry ISRCTN23355755). RESULTS: All 10 cases were successfully treated by the assigned technique. The two groups were similar in terms of indications for the procedure, bifurcation angle, and stent dimensions. As compared to the non-PSO, the PSO group showed larger proximal SB stent areas (5.8 ± 1.8 vs. 4.5 ± 0.5 mm(2); p = 0.02), the larger delta between distal and proximal stent areas before crush (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 mm(2); p = 0.004), and the larger Space of Optimal Wiring (SOW) after Crush (5.3 ± 1.8 vs. 2.5 ± 1.1 mm(2); p = 0.02). The gaps in scaffolding within the ostial segment of the Side Branch DES were found in two patients from the non-PSO group. CONCLUSION: The DK Crush in PSO modification results in larger SB DES and SOW areas with better apposition to the vessel wall. As result, the SB DES acquires a funnel shape, which reduces the risk of passage outside the SB stent struts during re-wiring, thus, allowing predictable and secure results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8965003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89650032022-03-31 Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting Lavarra, Francesco Tarantini, Giuseppe Sala, Davide Sirbu, Vasile Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the potential intraprocedural benefits of the Proximal Side Optimization (PSO) technique by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). METHODS: A case series of 10 consecutive true bifurcation lesions, with severe long pathology of long side branch (SB), were randomly assigned to be treated by standard DK Crush procedure (non-PSO group) as compared to DK Crush in PSO modification (PSO group). The data from OCT investigation before crushing of the SB Drug-Eluting Stent (DES), after crushing, after first kissing balloon inflation (KBI), and after final angiography were compared between the two groups (Public trials registry ISRCTN23355755). RESULTS: All 10 cases were successfully treated by the assigned technique. The two groups were similar in terms of indications for the procedure, bifurcation angle, and stent dimensions. As compared to the non-PSO, the PSO group showed larger proximal SB stent areas (5.8 ± 1.8 vs. 4.5 ± 0.5 mm(2); p = 0.02), the larger delta between distal and proximal stent areas before crush (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 mm(2); p = 0.004), and the larger Space of Optimal Wiring (SOW) after Crush (5.3 ± 1.8 vs. 2.5 ± 1.1 mm(2); p = 0.02). The gaps in scaffolding within the ostial segment of the Side Branch DES were found in two patients from the non-PSO group. CONCLUSION: The DK Crush in PSO modification results in larger SB DES and SOW areas with better apposition to the vessel wall. As result, the SB DES acquires a funnel shape, which reduces the risk of passage outside the SB stent struts during re-wiring, thus, allowing predictable and secure results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8965003/ /pubmed/35369311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.861129 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lavarra, Tarantini, Sala and Sirbu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Lavarra, Francesco Tarantini, Giuseppe Sala, Davide Sirbu, Vasile Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title | Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title_full | Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title_fullStr | Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title_short | Optical Coherence Tomography to Assess Proximal Side Optimization Technique in Crush Stenting |
title_sort | optical coherence tomography to assess proximal side optimization technique in crush stenting |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.861129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavarrafrancesco opticalcoherencetomographytoassessproximalsideoptimizationtechniqueincrushstenting AT tarantinigiuseppe opticalcoherencetomographytoassessproximalsideoptimizationtechniqueincrushstenting AT saladavide opticalcoherencetomographytoassessproximalsideoptimizationtechniqueincrushstenting AT sirbuvasile opticalcoherencetomographytoassessproximalsideoptimizationtechniqueincrushstenting |