Cargando…

Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method

Two kinds of initiatives exist to ensure welfare in broiler production: welfare legislation, where all broiler production in a country or region must comply with legally defined welfare standards; and market driven initiatives, where part of the production must meet specific welfare standards and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandøe, Peter, Hansen, Henning Otte, Forkman, Björn, van Horne, Peter, Houe, Hans, de Jong, Ingrid C., Kjær, Jørgen B., Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Palmer, Clare, Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær, Christensen, Tove
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101806
_version_ 1784678370062106624
author Sandøe, Peter
Hansen, Henning Otte
Forkman, Björn
van Horne, Peter
Houe, Hans
de Jong, Ingrid C.
Kjær, Jørgen B.
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Palmer, Clare
Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær
Christensen, Tove
author_facet Sandøe, Peter
Hansen, Henning Otte
Forkman, Björn
van Horne, Peter
Houe, Hans
de Jong, Ingrid C.
Kjær, Jørgen B.
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Palmer, Clare
Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær
Christensen, Tove
author_sort Sandøe, Peter
collection PubMed
description Two kinds of initiatives exist to ensure welfare in broiler production: welfare legislation, where all broiler production in a country or region must comply with legally defined welfare standards; and market driven initiatives, where part of the production must meet specific welfare standards and is sold with a particular label, typically at a price premium, or as part of minimum welfare standards defined by a retailer, a fast-food chain or the like. While the effects of national legislation may be undermined by price competition from lower welfare imported products, the effects of market driven initiatives may be limited by lack of willingness from consumers to pay the extra cost. To investigate how this works out in practice, we compared broiler welfare requirements in 5 European countries, Denmark, Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Sweden, in 2018, by means of the Benchmark method. A number of welfare dimensions, covering the input features typically modified in broiler welfare initiatives, were defined. A total of 27 academic welfare experts (response rate 75%) valued the different levels within each dimension on a 0 to 10 scale, and then weighted the relative contribution of each dimension to overall welfare on a 1 to 5 scale. By combining these values and weights with an inventory of existing welfare initiatives, the additional welfare generated by each initiative was calculated. Together with information on national coverage of each initiative, the Benchmark score for each country's production and consumption of chicken meat was calculated. Sweden achieved a much higher Benchmark for national production due to higher legal standards than any of the four other countries. The Netherlands, on the other hand, achieved a Benchmark for national consumption of chicken at the same level as that found in Sweden, because market driven initiatives complemented more welfare-limited Dutch legislation. So, despite some uncertainties in the Benchmark method, it appears that market driven initiatives can have a strong impact on improving broiler welfare, building on those standards achieved by animal welfare legislation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8965143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89651432022-03-31 Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method Sandøe, Peter Hansen, Henning Otte Forkman, Björn van Horne, Peter Houe, Hans de Jong, Ingrid C. Kjær, Jørgen B. Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Palmer, Clare Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær Christensen, Tove Poult Sci ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR Two kinds of initiatives exist to ensure welfare in broiler production: welfare legislation, where all broiler production in a country or region must comply with legally defined welfare standards; and market driven initiatives, where part of the production must meet specific welfare standards and is sold with a particular label, typically at a price premium, or as part of minimum welfare standards defined by a retailer, a fast-food chain or the like. While the effects of national legislation may be undermined by price competition from lower welfare imported products, the effects of market driven initiatives may be limited by lack of willingness from consumers to pay the extra cost. To investigate how this works out in practice, we compared broiler welfare requirements in 5 European countries, Denmark, Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Sweden, in 2018, by means of the Benchmark method. A number of welfare dimensions, covering the input features typically modified in broiler welfare initiatives, were defined. A total of 27 academic welfare experts (response rate 75%) valued the different levels within each dimension on a 0 to 10 scale, and then weighted the relative contribution of each dimension to overall welfare on a 1 to 5 scale. By combining these values and weights with an inventory of existing welfare initiatives, the additional welfare generated by each initiative was calculated. Together with information on national coverage of each initiative, the Benchmark score for each country's production and consumption of chicken meat was calculated. Sweden achieved a much higher Benchmark for national production due to higher legal standards than any of the four other countries. The Netherlands, on the other hand, achieved a Benchmark for national consumption of chicken at the same level as that found in Sweden, because market driven initiatives complemented more welfare-limited Dutch legislation. So, despite some uncertainties in the Benchmark method, it appears that market driven initiatives can have a strong impact on improving broiler welfare, building on those standards achieved by animal welfare legislation. Elsevier 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8965143/ /pubmed/35349952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101806 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR
Sandøe, Peter
Hansen, Henning Otte
Forkman, Björn
van Horne, Peter
Houe, Hans
de Jong, Ingrid C.
Kjær, Jørgen B.
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Palmer, Clare
Rhode, Helle Lottrup Halkjær
Christensen, Tove
Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title_full Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title_fullStr Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title_full_unstemmed Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title_short Market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five European countries based on the Benchmark method
title_sort market driven initiatives can improve broiler welfare – a comparison across five european countries based on the benchmark method
topic ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101806
work_keys_str_mv AT sandøepeter marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT hansenhenningotte marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT forkmanbjorn marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT vanhornepeter marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT houehans marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT dejongingridc marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT kjærjørgenb marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT nielsensørensaxmose marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT palmerclare marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT rhodehellelottruphalkjær marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod
AT christensentove marketdriveninitiativescanimprovebroilerwelfareacomparisonacrossfiveeuropeancountriesbasedonthebenchmarkmethod