Cargando…

Efficacy of Intermittent, Oral Famciclovir Prophylaxis for Bortezomib-Induced Herpes Zoster in Multiple Myeloma Patients

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of intermittent, oral famciclovir prophylaxis for bortezomib-induced herpes zoster in multiple myeloma patients. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of bortezomib treatment-related varicella-zoster virus reactivation in 719 newly-diagnosed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Gaofeng, Guan, Fangshu, Han, Xiaoyan, Yang, Li, Zhao, Yi, Yang, Yang, Zhang, Enfang, He, Jingsong, He, Donghua, Wu, Wenjun, Huang, He, Cai, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8965704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.843032
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of intermittent, oral famciclovir prophylaxis for bortezomib-induced herpes zoster in multiple myeloma patients. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of bortezomib treatment-related varicella-zoster virus reactivation in 719 newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving intermittent oral famciclovir prophylaxis, continuous oral acyclovir prophylaxis or no prophylaxis. The definition of intermittent oral famciclovir prophylaxis was oral famciclovir at a dose of 250mg twice daily for 9 days after finishing the last dose of bortezomib therapy every cycle. Age, gender, stage per the International Staging System, type of M protein, baseline of absolute lymphocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute monocyte count were analyzed to find the potential factors that could predispose to herpes zoster infections. RESULTS: Varicella-zoster virus infection occurred in 96 patients (13.4%) during bortezomib treatment. The incidence of herpes zoster was significantly higher in the non-prophylaxis group compared with the prophylaxis group (22.9% vs 8.2% P<0.001), while the rate was similar between the intermittent oral famciclovir group and the continuous oral acyclovir group (8.4% vs 7.9% P=0.835). Hepatic and renal toxicity were observed in 12% and 2.8% of the patient respectively in the intermittent famciclovir group, which was similar in the continuous acyclovir group (18.1% and 4.2%). The prophylactic use of antiviral agents is a predictive factor for varicella-zoster virus reactivation. CONCLUSION: Intermittent famciclovir prophylaxis is effective and safe in preventing herpes zoster development and can markedly reduce the duration of oral medicine treatment compared with continuous acyclovir prophylaxis.