Cargando…

Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the CA implants (Osstem Implant, Busan, Korea), calcium-modified surfaced treated implants on acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2015, 258 implants of 120 patients p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min-Joong, Kim, Il-hyung, Chang, Na-Hee, Kim, Young-Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0
_version_ 1784678626170503168
author Kim, Min-Joong
Kim, Il-hyung
Chang, Na-Hee
Kim, Young-Kyun
author_facet Kim, Min-Joong
Kim, Il-hyung
Chang, Na-Hee
Kim, Young-Kyun
author_sort Kim, Min-Joong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the CA implants (Osstem Implant, Busan, Korea), calcium-modified surfaced treated implants on acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2015, 258 implants of 120 patients placed between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Using medical records and periapical radiographs, sex, age, location, fixture width and length of placed implants, presence or absence of bone graft, types of bone substitutes and membrane used for bone grafting, primary and secondary stability, initial and delayed complications, and marginal bone loss were investigated. The success rate and survival rate of the implants in each group were analyzed retrospectively based on the criteria suggested by Albrektsson et al. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2015, with a follow-up longer than 5 years, 258 implants with an average diameter of 4.63 mm (3.5–5.5 mm) and an average length of 9.94 mm (7.0–13.0 mm) were placed in a total of 120 patients (61 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 63.7 years for an average of 62 months of observation period. The survival rate was 97.3%, the success rate was 94.2%, and the average final marginal bone loss was 0.074 mm. CONCLUSION: The CA implants manufactured with the improved surface treatment method exhibited a survival rate of 97.3% and a success rate of 94.2% over an average observation period of 62 months. The implants were not affected by most factors and had very high survival and success rates over a long period of observation. In particular, the stability of the implant was excellent, with no cases of failed implants in delayed placement after bone grafting and a healing period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89663112022-03-31 Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study Kim, Min-Joong Kim, Il-hyung Chang, Na-Hee Kim, Young-Kyun BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the CA implants (Osstem Implant, Busan, Korea), calcium-modified surfaced treated implants on acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2015, 258 implants of 120 patients placed between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Using medical records and periapical radiographs, sex, age, location, fixture width and length of placed implants, presence or absence of bone graft, types of bone substitutes and membrane used for bone grafting, primary and secondary stability, initial and delayed complications, and marginal bone loss were investigated. The success rate and survival rate of the implants in each group were analyzed retrospectively based on the criteria suggested by Albrektsson et al. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2015, with a follow-up longer than 5 years, 258 implants with an average diameter of 4.63 mm (3.5–5.5 mm) and an average length of 9.94 mm (7.0–13.0 mm) were placed in a total of 120 patients (61 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 63.7 years for an average of 62 months of observation period. The survival rate was 97.3%, the success rate was 94.2%, and the average final marginal bone loss was 0.074 mm. CONCLUSION: The CA implants manufactured with the improved surface treatment method exhibited a survival rate of 97.3% and a success rate of 94.2% over an average observation period of 62 months. The implants were not affected by most factors and had very high survival and success rates over a long period of observation. In particular, the stability of the implant was excellent, with no cases of failed implants in delayed placement after bone grafting and a healing period. BioMed Central 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8966311/ /pubmed/35351072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Min-Joong
Kim, Il-hyung
Chang, Na-Hee
Kim, Young-Kyun
Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title_full Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title_fullStr Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title_short Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study
title_sort long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated ca implants: a retrospective clinical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminjoong longtermevaluationoftheprognosisofsuperhydrophilicsurfacetreatedcaimplantsaretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kimilhyung longtermevaluationoftheprognosisofsuperhydrophilicsurfacetreatedcaimplantsaretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT changnahee longtermevaluationoftheprognosisofsuperhydrophilicsurfacetreatedcaimplantsaretrospectiveclinicalstudy
AT kimyoungkyun longtermevaluationoftheprognosisofsuperhydrophilicsurfacetreatedcaimplantsaretrospectiveclinicalstudy