Cargando…

Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men

How corticospinal excitability changes during eccentric locomotor exercise is unknown. In the present study, 13 volunteers performed 30-min strenuous concentric and eccentric cycling bouts at the same power output (60% concentric peak power output). Transcranial magnetic and electrical femoral nerve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clos, Pierre, Mater, Adrien, Legrand, Hippolyte, Poirier, Gabriel, Ballay, Yves, Martin, Alain, Lepers, Romuald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35370788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.854824
_version_ 1784678641047699456
author Clos, Pierre
Mater, Adrien
Legrand, Hippolyte
Poirier, Gabriel
Ballay, Yves
Martin, Alain
Lepers, Romuald
author_facet Clos, Pierre
Mater, Adrien
Legrand, Hippolyte
Poirier, Gabriel
Ballay, Yves
Martin, Alain
Lepers, Romuald
author_sort Clos, Pierre
collection PubMed
description How corticospinal excitability changes during eccentric locomotor exercise is unknown. In the present study, 13 volunteers performed 30-min strenuous concentric and eccentric cycling bouts at the same power output (60% concentric peak power output). Transcranial magnetic and electrical femoral nerve stimulations were applied at exercise onset (3rd min) and end (25th min). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitude was measured for the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles with surface electromyography (EMG) and expressed as a percentage of maximal M-wave amplitude (M(MAX)). EMG amplitude 100 ms prior to MEPs and the silent period duration were calculated. There was no change in any neural parameter during the exercises (all P > 0.24). VL and RF M(MAX) were unaffected by exercise modality (all P > 0.38). VL MEP amplitude was greater (26 ± 11.4 vs. 15.2 ± 7.7% M(MAX); P = 0.008) during concentric than eccentric cycling whereas RF MEP amplitude was not different (24.4 ± 10.8 vs. 17.2 ± 9.8% M(MAX); P = 0.051). While VL EMG was higher during concentric than eccentric cycling (P = 0.03), RF EMG showed no significant difference (P = 0.07). Similar silent period durations were found (RF: 120 ± 30 ms; VL: 114 ± 27 ms; all P > 0.61), but the silent period/MEP ratio was higher during eccentric than concentric cycling for both muscles (all P < 0.02). In conclusion, corticospinal excitability to the knee extensors is lower and relative silent period longer during eccentric than concentric cycling, yet both remained unaltered with time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89663792022-03-31 Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men Clos, Pierre Mater, Adrien Legrand, Hippolyte Poirier, Gabriel Ballay, Yves Martin, Alain Lepers, Romuald Front Physiol Physiology How corticospinal excitability changes during eccentric locomotor exercise is unknown. In the present study, 13 volunteers performed 30-min strenuous concentric and eccentric cycling bouts at the same power output (60% concentric peak power output). Transcranial magnetic and electrical femoral nerve stimulations were applied at exercise onset (3rd min) and end (25th min). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitude was measured for the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles with surface electromyography (EMG) and expressed as a percentage of maximal M-wave amplitude (M(MAX)). EMG amplitude 100 ms prior to MEPs and the silent period duration were calculated. There was no change in any neural parameter during the exercises (all P > 0.24). VL and RF M(MAX) were unaffected by exercise modality (all P > 0.38). VL MEP amplitude was greater (26 ± 11.4 vs. 15.2 ± 7.7% M(MAX); P = 0.008) during concentric than eccentric cycling whereas RF MEP amplitude was not different (24.4 ± 10.8 vs. 17.2 ± 9.8% M(MAX); P = 0.051). While VL EMG was higher during concentric than eccentric cycling (P = 0.03), RF EMG showed no significant difference (P = 0.07). Similar silent period durations were found (RF: 120 ± 30 ms; VL: 114 ± 27 ms; all P > 0.61), but the silent period/MEP ratio was higher during eccentric than concentric cycling for both muscles (all P < 0.02). In conclusion, corticospinal excitability to the knee extensors is lower and relative silent period longer during eccentric than concentric cycling, yet both remained unaltered with time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8966379/ /pubmed/35370788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.854824 Text en Copyright © 2022 Clos, Mater, Legrand, Poirier, Ballay, Martin and Lepers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Clos, Pierre
Mater, Adrien
Legrand, Hippolyte
Poirier, Gabriel
Ballay, Yves
Martin, Alain
Lepers, Romuald
Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title_full Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title_fullStr Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title_full_unstemmed Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title_short Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men
title_sort corticospinal excitability is lower during eccentric than concentric cycling in men
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35370788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.854824
work_keys_str_mv AT clospierre corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT materadrien corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT legrandhippolyte corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT poiriergabriel corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT ballayyves corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT martinalain corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen
AT lepersromuald corticospinalexcitabilityislowerduringeccentricthanconcentriccyclinginmen