Cargando…

Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The paths of medically assisted reproduction represent the most important scientific progress to cope with the inability to achieve spontaneous conception (SC) and to reach desired parenthood. Couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) and couples not facing ovulation in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgio, Sofia, Polizzi, Concetta, Buzzaccarini, Giovanni, Laganà, Antonio Simone, Gullo, Giuseppe, Perricone, Giovanna, Perino, Antonino, Cucinella, Gaspare, Alesi, Marianna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388278
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.114404
_version_ 1784678648915165184
author Burgio, Sofia
Polizzi, Concetta
Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Gullo, Giuseppe
Perricone, Giovanna
Perino, Antonino
Cucinella, Gaspare
Alesi, Marianna
author_facet Burgio, Sofia
Polizzi, Concetta
Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Gullo, Giuseppe
Perricone, Giovanna
Perino, Antonino
Cucinella, Gaspare
Alesi, Marianna
author_sort Burgio, Sofia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The paths of medically assisted reproduction represent the most important scientific progress to cope with the inability to achieve spontaneous conception (SC) and to reach desired parenthood. Couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) and couples not facing ovulation induction and artificial fertilization show sufficient levels of well-being and psychological adjustment. However, in some cases couples undergoing ART show lower perceived quality of life than couples with SC. Our aim is to investigate the main psychological variables involved in the special risk condition of medically assisted reproduction and how they could direct specific guidelines to enhance mental wellbeing in dealing with infertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this regard, we performed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. From all the studies included, the considered outcome measures were psychological, social, and relational variables and are presented in a systematic approach. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included in this article, according to our strict inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Conflicting results have been proven by this systematic review. Even though all underlined the importance of taking charge of the psychological variables in infertility, few studies monitored and evaluated the effectiveness of these interventions. Moreover, none of the selected studies monitored the evolutionary implications of parental competence on the development of children born from ART.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89664202022-04-05 Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review Burgio, Sofia Polizzi, Concetta Buzzaccarini, Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Gullo, Giuseppe Perricone, Giovanna Perino, Antonino Cucinella, Gaspare Alesi, Marianna Prz Menopauzalny Review Paper INTRODUCTION: The paths of medically assisted reproduction represent the most important scientific progress to cope with the inability to achieve spontaneous conception (SC) and to reach desired parenthood. Couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) and couples not facing ovulation induction and artificial fertilization show sufficient levels of well-being and psychological adjustment. However, in some cases couples undergoing ART show lower perceived quality of life than couples with SC. Our aim is to investigate the main psychological variables involved in the special risk condition of medically assisted reproduction and how they could direct specific guidelines to enhance mental wellbeing in dealing with infertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this regard, we performed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. From all the studies included, the considered outcome measures were psychological, social, and relational variables and are presented in a systematic approach. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included in this article, according to our strict inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Conflicting results have been proven by this systematic review. Even though all underlined the importance of taking charge of the psychological variables in infertility, few studies monitored and evaluated the effectiveness of these interventions. Moreover, none of the selected studies monitored the evolutionary implications of parental competence on the development of children born from ART. Termedia Publishing House 2022-03-09 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8966420/ /pubmed/35388278 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.114404 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Review Paper
Burgio, Sofia
Polizzi, Concetta
Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Gullo, Giuseppe
Perricone, Giovanna
Perino, Antonino
Cucinella, Gaspare
Alesi, Marianna
Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title_full Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title_fullStr Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title_short Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
title_sort psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388278
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.114404
work_keys_str_mv AT burgiosofia psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT polizziconcetta psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT buzzaccarinigiovanni psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT laganaantoniosimone psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT gullogiuseppe psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT perriconegiovanna psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT perinoantonino psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT cucinellagaspare psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview
AT alesimarianna psychologicalvariablesinmedicallyassistedreproductionasystematicreview