Cargando…
Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey
OBJECTIVES: Good social functioning is important for people living with dementia and their families. The Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM) is a valid and reliable instrument measuring social functioning in dementia. However the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not yet b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252 |
_version_ | 1784678662386221056 |
---|---|
author | Levene, Tamara Livingston, Gill Banerjee, Sube Sommerlad, Andrew |
author_facet | Levene, Tamara Livingston, Gill Banerjee, Sube Sommerlad, Andrew |
author_sort | Levene, Tamara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Good social functioning is important for people living with dementia and their families. The Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM) is a valid and reliable instrument measuring social functioning in dementia. However the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not yet been derived for SF-DEM. This study aims to define the MCID for the SF-DEM. DESIGN: We used triangulation, incorporating data from a cross-sectional study to calculate the MCID using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, and a Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional survey comprised 299 family carers of people with dementia. Twenty dementia experts (researchers, clinicians, family carers) rated whether changes on clinical vignettes represented a meaningful change in the Delphi survey. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the distribution-based MCID as 0.5 of an SD for each of the three SF-DEM domains (1—spending time with others, 2—communicating with others, 3—sensitivity to others). We used the carers’ rating of social functioning to calculate the anchor-based MCID. For the Delphi survey, we defined consensus as ≥75% agreement. Where there was lack of consensus, experts were asked to complete a further survey round. RESULTS: We found that 0.5 SD of SF-DEM was 1.9 points, 2.2 and 1.4 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Using the anchoring analysis, the MCIDs were 1.7 points, 1.7 points, and 0.9 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The Delphi method required two rounds. In the second round, a consensus was reached that a 2-point change was considered significant in all three domains, but no consensus was reached on a 1-point change. CONCLUSIONS: By triangulating all three methods, the SF-DEM’s MCIDs were 1.9, 2.0 and 1.4 points for domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For individuals, these values should be rounded to a 2-point change for each domain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8966522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89665222022-04-19 Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey Levene, Tamara Livingston, Gill Banerjee, Sube Sommerlad, Andrew BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Good social functioning is important for people living with dementia and their families. The Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM) is a valid and reliable instrument measuring social functioning in dementia. However the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not yet been derived for SF-DEM. This study aims to define the MCID for the SF-DEM. DESIGN: We used triangulation, incorporating data from a cross-sectional study to calculate the MCID using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, and a Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional survey comprised 299 family carers of people with dementia. Twenty dementia experts (researchers, clinicians, family carers) rated whether changes on clinical vignettes represented a meaningful change in the Delphi survey. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the distribution-based MCID as 0.5 of an SD for each of the three SF-DEM domains (1—spending time with others, 2—communicating with others, 3—sensitivity to others). We used the carers’ rating of social functioning to calculate the anchor-based MCID. For the Delphi survey, we defined consensus as ≥75% agreement. Where there was lack of consensus, experts were asked to complete a further survey round. RESULTS: We found that 0.5 SD of SF-DEM was 1.9 points, 2.2 and 1.4 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Using the anchoring analysis, the MCIDs were 1.7 points, 1.7 points, and 0.9 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The Delphi method required two rounds. In the second round, a consensus was reached that a 2-point change was considered significant in all three domains, but no consensus was reached on a 1-point change. CONCLUSIONS: By triangulating all three methods, the SF-DEM’s MCIDs were 1.9, 2.0 and 1.4 points for domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For individuals, these values should be rounded to a 2-point change for each domain. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8966522/ /pubmed/35351729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Levene, Tamara Livingston, Gill Banerjee, Sube Sommerlad, Andrew Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title | Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title_full | Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title_fullStr | Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title_short | Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey |
title_sort | minimum clinically important difference of the social functioning in dementia scale (sf-dem): cross-sectional study and delphi survey |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levenetamara minimumclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthesocialfunctioningindementiascalesfdemcrosssectionalstudyanddelphisurvey AT livingstongill minimumclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthesocialfunctioningindementiascalesfdemcrosssectionalstudyanddelphisurvey AT banerjeesube minimumclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthesocialfunctioningindementiascalesfdemcrosssectionalstudyanddelphisurvey AT sommerladandrew minimumclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthesocialfunctioningindementiascalesfdemcrosssectionalstudyanddelphisurvey |