Cargando…

Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yue, Cai, Jianzheng, Yin, Rulan, Qin, Shuwen, Wang, Haifang, Shi, Xiaoqing, Mao, Lifen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014
_version_ 1784678670179237888
author Zhang, Yue
Cai, Jianzheng
Yin, Rulan
Qin, Shuwen
Wang, Haifang
Shi, Xiaoqing
Mao, Lifen
author_facet Zhang, Yue
Cai, Jianzheng
Yin, Rulan
Qin, Shuwen
Wang, Haifang
Shi, Xiaoqing
Mao, Lifen
author_sort Zhang, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies (up to 27 January 2021). We included cross-sectional, case–control or cohort studies in which both abusers and victims were nurses. Studies that did not provide specific data on abusers were excluded. Stata V.16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Fixed-effect or random-effect model was adopted according to heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran’s Q and I(2) values. The main indicator was LV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 6124 nurses were included. Further, 13 articles with 5745 nurses were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of LV among nurses was 33.08% (95% CI: 23.41% to 42.75%, p<0.05; I(2)=99.0%). The remaining one study containing 370 samples reported that the prevalence of inter-nurse LV was 7.92%. Subgroup analysis showed that region, sample size, sampling, study’s quality, response rate and publication time might not be the sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression indicated that sample size had the main influence on model heterogeneity. Egger’s test showed the existence of publication bias (p=0.03). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of inter-nurse LV is high in nurse workplace. It is suggested that scholars pay more attention to the cultural differences of inter-nurse LV between regions in the future. This study has the following limitations: there is a lack of studies on LV prevalence in many countries; lack of standard assessment tools; no grey literature was searched.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89665762022-04-19 Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yue Cai, Jianzheng Yin, Rulan Qin, Shuwen Wang, Haifang Shi, Xiaoqing Mao, Lifen BMJ Open Nursing BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies (up to 27 January 2021). We included cross-sectional, case–control or cohort studies in which both abusers and victims were nurses. Studies that did not provide specific data on abusers were excluded. Stata V.16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Fixed-effect or random-effect model was adopted according to heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran’s Q and I(2) values. The main indicator was LV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 6124 nurses were included. Further, 13 articles with 5745 nurses were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of LV among nurses was 33.08% (95% CI: 23.41% to 42.75%, p<0.05; I(2)=99.0%). The remaining one study containing 370 samples reported that the prevalence of inter-nurse LV was 7.92%. Subgroup analysis showed that region, sample size, sampling, study’s quality, response rate and publication time might not be the sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression indicated that sample size had the main influence on model heterogeneity. Egger’s test showed the existence of publication bias (p=0.03). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of inter-nurse LV is high in nurse workplace. It is suggested that scholars pay more attention to the cultural differences of inter-nurse LV between regions in the future. This study has the following limitations: there is a lack of studies on LV prevalence in many countries; lack of standard assessment tools; no grey literature was searched. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8966576/ /pubmed/35351708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Zhang, Yue
Cai, Jianzheng
Yin, Rulan
Qin, Shuwen
Wang, Haifang
Shi, Xiaoqing
Mao, Lifen
Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyue prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caijianzheng prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinrulan prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinshuwen prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghaifang prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shixiaoqing prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maolifen prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis