Cargando…
Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014 |
_version_ | 1784678670179237888 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yue Cai, Jianzheng Yin, Rulan Qin, Shuwen Wang, Haifang Shi, Xiaoqing Mao, Lifen |
author_facet | Zhang, Yue Cai, Jianzheng Yin, Rulan Qin, Shuwen Wang, Haifang Shi, Xiaoqing Mao, Lifen |
author_sort | Zhang, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies (up to 27 January 2021). We included cross-sectional, case–control or cohort studies in which both abusers and victims were nurses. Studies that did not provide specific data on abusers were excluded. Stata V.16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Fixed-effect or random-effect model was adopted according to heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran’s Q and I(2) values. The main indicator was LV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 6124 nurses were included. Further, 13 articles with 5745 nurses were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of LV among nurses was 33.08% (95% CI: 23.41% to 42.75%, p<0.05; I(2)=99.0%). The remaining one study containing 370 samples reported that the prevalence of inter-nurse LV was 7.92%. Subgroup analysis showed that region, sample size, sampling, study’s quality, response rate and publication time might not be the sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression indicated that sample size had the main influence on model heterogeneity. Egger’s test showed the existence of publication bias (p=0.03). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of inter-nurse LV is high in nurse workplace. It is suggested that scholars pay more attention to the cultural differences of inter-nurse LV between regions in the future. This study has the following limitations: there is a lack of studies on LV prevalence in many countries; lack of standard assessment tools; no grey literature was searched. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8966576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89665762022-04-19 Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yue Cai, Jianzheng Yin, Rulan Qin, Shuwen Wang, Haifang Shi, Xiaoqing Mao, Lifen BMJ Open Nursing BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses’ workplaces. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies (up to 27 January 2021). We included cross-sectional, case–control or cohort studies in which both abusers and victims were nurses. Studies that did not provide specific data on abusers were excluded. Stata V.16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Fixed-effect or random-effect model was adopted according to heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran’s Q and I(2) values. The main indicator was LV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 6124 nurses were included. Further, 13 articles with 5745 nurses were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of LV among nurses was 33.08% (95% CI: 23.41% to 42.75%, p<0.05; I(2)=99.0%). The remaining one study containing 370 samples reported that the prevalence of inter-nurse LV was 7.92%. Subgroup analysis showed that region, sample size, sampling, study’s quality, response rate and publication time might not be the sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression indicated that sample size had the main influence on model heterogeneity. Egger’s test showed the existence of publication bias (p=0.03). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of inter-nurse LV is high in nurse workplace. It is suggested that scholars pay more attention to the cultural differences of inter-nurse LV between regions in the future. This study has the following limitations: there is a lack of studies on LV prevalence in many countries; lack of standard assessment tools; no grey literature was searched. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8966576/ /pubmed/35351708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Nursing Zhang, Yue Cai, Jianzheng Yin, Rulan Qin, Shuwen Wang, Haifang Shi, Xiaoqing Mao, Lifen Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35351708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyue prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caijianzheng prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinrulan prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinshuwen prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghaifang prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shixiaoqing prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maolifen prevalenceoflateralviolenceinnurseworkplaceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |