Cargando…

“What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment

BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Emily Gard, Wuite, Sara, Lawson, Beverley, Andrew, Melissa K., Edwards, Lynn, MacKenzie, Adrian, Woodrow, Ana Correa, Peddle, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5
_version_ 1784678720878936064
author Marshall, Emily Gard
Wuite, Sara
Lawson, Beverley
Andrew, Melissa K.
Edwards, Lynn
MacKenzie, Adrian
Woodrow, Ana Correa
Peddle, Sarah
author_facet Marshall, Emily Gard
Wuite, Sara
Lawson, Beverley
Andrew, Melissa K.
Edwards, Lynn
MacKenzie, Adrian
Woodrow, Ana Correa
Peddle, Sarah
author_sort Marshall, Emily Gard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date. METHODS: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedian’s model of assessing healthcare access and quality. RESULTS: Five key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care. CONCLUSIONS: Unattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89668492022-03-31 “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment Marshall, Emily Gard Wuite, Sara Lawson, Beverley Andrew, Melissa K. Edwards, Lynn MacKenzie, Adrian Woodrow, Ana Correa Peddle, Sarah BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date. METHODS: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedian’s model of assessing healthcare access and quality. RESULTS: Five key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care. CONCLUSIONS: Unattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5. BioMed Central 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8966849/ /pubmed/35354438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marshall, Emily Gard
Wuite, Sara
Lawson, Beverley
Andrew, Melissa K.
Edwards, Lynn
MacKenzie, Adrian
Woodrow, Ana Correa
Peddle, Sarah
“What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title_full “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title_fullStr “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title_full_unstemmed “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title_short “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
title_sort “what do you mean i can’t have a doctor? this is canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallemilygard whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT wuitesara whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT lawsonbeverley whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT andrewmelissak whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT edwardslynn whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT mackenzieadrian whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT woodrowanacorrea whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment
AT peddlesarah whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment