Cargando…
“What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment
BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5 |
_version_ | 1784678720878936064 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Emily Gard Wuite, Sara Lawson, Beverley Andrew, Melissa K. Edwards, Lynn MacKenzie, Adrian Woodrow, Ana Correa Peddle, Sarah |
author_facet | Marshall, Emily Gard Wuite, Sara Lawson, Beverley Andrew, Melissa K. Edwards, Lynn MacKenzie, Adrian Woodrow, Ana Correa Peddle, Sarah |
author_sort | Marshall, Emily Gard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date. METHODS: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedian’s model of assessing healthcare access and quality. RESULTS: Five key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care. CONCLUSIONS: Unattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8966849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89668492022-03-31 “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment Marshall, Emily Gard Wuite, Sara Lawson, Beverley Andrew, Melissa K. Edwards, Lynn MacKenzie, Adrian Woodrow, Ana Correa Peddle, Sarah BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Patient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date. METHODS: A realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedian’s model of assessing healthcare access and quality. RESULTS: Five key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care. CONCLUSIONS: Unattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5. BioMed Central 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8966849/ /pubmed/35354438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Marshall, Emily Gard Wuite, Sara Lawson, Beverley Andrew, Melissa K. Edwards, Lynn MacKenzie, Adrian Woodrow, Ana Correa Peddle, Sarah “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title | “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title_full | “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title_fullStr | “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title_full_unstemmed | “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title_short | “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? this is Canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
title_sort | “what do you mean i can’t have a doctor? this is canada!” – a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallemilygard whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT wuitesara whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT lawsonbeverley whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT andrewmelissak whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT edwardslynn whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT mackenzieadrian whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT woodrowanacorrea whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment AT peddlesarah whatdoyoumeanicanthaveadoctorthisiscanadaaqualitativestudyofthemyriadconsequencesforunattachedpatientsawaitingprimarycareattachment |