Cargando…

Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future

With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleming, James N., Pollock, McLean D., Taber, David J., McGillicuddy, John W., Diamantidis, Clarissa J., Docherty, Sharron L., Chambers, Eileen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298
_version_ 1784678736402055168
author Fleming, James N.
Pollock, McLean D.
Taber, David J.
McGillicuddy, John W.
Diamantidis, Clarissa J.
Docherty, Sharron L.
Chambers, Eileen T.
author_facet Fleming, James N.
Pollock, McLean D.
Taber, David J.
McGillicuddy, John W.
Diamantidis, Clarissa J.
Docherty, Sharron L.
Chambers, Eileen T.
author_sort Fleming, James N.
collection PubMed
description With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-management or a patient–provider relationship and aim to improve clinical outcomes. The interventions were then analyzed and evaluated to identify current gaps and future needs of mHealth apps in solid organ transplantation. RESULTS. The authors found a nearly universal dichotomy between perceived utility and sustained use, with most studies demonstrating significant attrition during the course of the intervention. In addition, interoperability continues to be a challenge. CONCLUSIONS. The authors present potential methods for mitigating the identified barriers and gaps in mHealth apps for solid organ transplant recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8966961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89669612022-03-31 Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Fleming, James N. Pollock, McLean D. Taber, David J. McGillicuddy, John W. Diamantidis, Clarissa J. Docherty, Sharron L. Chambers, Eileen T. Transplant Direct Review With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-management or a patient–provider relationship and aim to improve clinical outcomes. The interventions were then analyzed and evaluated to identify current gaps and future needs of mHealth apps in solid organ transplantation. RESULTS. The authors found a nearly universal dichotomy between perceived utility and sustained use, with most studies demonstrating significant attrition during the course of the intervention. In addition, interoperability continues to be a challenge. CONCLUSIONS. The authors present potential methods for mitigating the identified barriers and gaps in mHealth apps for solid organ transplant recipients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8966961/ /pubmed/35368987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review
Fleming, James N.
Pollock, McLean D.
Taber, David J.
McGillicuddy, John W.
Diamantidis, Clarissa J.
Docherty, Sharron L.
Chambers, Eileen T.
Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title_full Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title_fullStr Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title_full_unstemmed Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title_short Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
title_sort review and evaluation of mhealth apps in solid organ transplantation: past, present, and future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298
work_keys_str_mv AT flemingjamesn reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT pollockmcleand reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT taberdavidj reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT mcgillicuddyjohnw reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT diamantidisclarissaj reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT dochertysharronl reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture
AT chamberseileent reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture