Cargando…
Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future
With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-manag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298 |
_version_ | 1784678736402055168 |
---|---|
author | Fleming, James N. Pollock, McLean D. Taber, David J. McGillicuddy, John W. Diamantidis, Clarissa J. Docherty, Sharron L. Chambers, Eileen T. |
author_facet | Fleming, James N. Pollock, McLean D. Taber, David J. McGillicuddy, John W. Diamantidis, Clarissa J. Docherty, Sharron L. Chambers, Eileen T. |
author_sort | Fleming, James N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-management or a patient–provider relationship and aim to improve clinical outcomes. The interventions were then analyzed and evaluated to identify current gaps and future needs of mHealth apps in solid organ transplantation. RESULTS. The authors found a nearly universal dichotomy between perceived utility and sustained use, with most studies demonstrating significant attrition during the course of the intervention. In addition, interoperability continues to be a challenge. CONCLUSIONS. The authors present potential methods for mitigating the identified barriers and gaps in mHealth apps for solid organ transplant recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8966961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89669612022-03-31 Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Fleming, James N. Pollock, McLean D. Taber, David J. McGillicuddy, John W. Diamantidis, Clarissa J. Docherty, Sharron L. Chambers, Eileen T. Transplant Direct Review With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system. METHODS. The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-management or a patient–provider relationship and aim to improve clinical outcomes. The interventions were then analyzed and evaluated to identify current gaps and future needs of mHealth apps in solid organ transplantation. RESULTS. The authors found a nearly universal dichotomy between perceived utility and sustained use, with most studies demonstrating significant attrition during the course of the intervention. In addition, interoperability continues to be a challenge. CONCLUSIONS. The authors present potential methods for mitigating the identified barriers and gaps in mHealth apps for solid organ transplant recipients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8966961/ /pubmed/35368987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Review Fleming, James N. Pollock, McLean D. Taber, David J. McGillicuddy, John W. Diamantidis, Clarissa J. Docherty, Sharron L. Chambers, Eileen T. Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title | Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full | Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title_fullStr | Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title_short | Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future |
title_sort | review and evaluation of mhealth apps in solid organ transplantation: past, present, and future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flemingjamesn reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT pollockmcleand reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT taberdavidj reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT mcgillicuddyjohnw reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT diamantidisclarissaj reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT dochertysharronl reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture AT chamberseileent reviewandevaluationofmhealthappsinsolidorgantransplantationpastpresentandfuture |