Cargando…

Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome

PURPOSE: To explore the histopathological findings of cesarean scar defect (CSD) and the immunological component in women with cesarean scar syndrome (CSS). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital and a public hospital. A total of 63 patients with secondary infertili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higuchi, Asuka, Tsuji, Shunichiro, Nobuta, Yuri, Nakamura, Akiko, Katsura, Daisuke, Amano, Tsukuru, Kimura, Fuminori, Tanimura, Satoshi, Murakami, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12431
_version_ 1784678811944615936
author Higuchi, Asuka
Tsuji, Shunichiro
Nobuta, Yuri
Nakamura, Akiko
Katsura, Daisuke
Amano, Tsukuru
Kimura, Fuminori
Tanimura, Satoshi
Murakami, Takashi
author_facet Higuchi, Asuka
Tsuji, Shunichiro
Nobuta, Yuri
Nakamura, Akiko
Katsura, Daisuke
Amano, Tsukuru
Kimura, Fuminori
Tanimura, Satoshi
Murakami, Takashi
author_sort Higuchi, Asuka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the histopathological findings of cesarean scar defect (CSD) and the immunological component in women with cesarean scar syndrome (CSS). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital and a public hospital. A total of 63 patients with secondary infertility due to CSS who underwent laparoscopic resection of the CSD lesion were enrolled (CSS group), and 21 patients who underwent hysterectomy with a history of cesarean section were enrolled as control (non‐CSS group). We compared the differences in histopathological findings of CSD lesions by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD20, CD56, CD68, CD138, myeloperoxidase, and tryptase between the two groups. RESULTS: The frequency of presence of endometrium on the CSD surface was significantly lower (p = 0.0023) and that of adenomyosis was significantly higher (p = 0.0195) in the CSS group than in the non‐CSS group. The number of CD3‐, CD20‐, CD68‐, and tryptase‐positive cells was significantly lower in the CSS group than in the non‐CSS group; however, the number of CD138‐positive cells was significantly higher in the CSS group (p = 0.0042). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the absence of endometrium, presence of adenomyosis, and chronic inflammation in CSD contributes to secondary infertility due to CSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8967299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89672992022-04-05 Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome Higuchi, Asuka Tsuji, Shunichiro Nobuta, Yuri Nakamura, Akiko Katsura, Daisuke Amano, Tsukuru Kimura, Fuminori Tanimura, Satoshi Murakami, Takashi Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: To explore the histopathological findings of cesarean scar defect (CSD) and the immunological component in women with cesarean scar syndrome (CSS). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital and a public hospital. A total of 63 patients with secondary infertility due to CSS who underwent laparoscopic resection of the CSD lesion were enrolled (CSS group), and 21 patients who underwent hysterectomy with a history of cesarean section were enrolled as control (non‐CSS group). We compared the differences in histopathological findings of CSD lesions by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD20, CD56, CD68, CD138, myeloperoxidase, and tryptase between the two groups. RESULTS: The frequency of presence of endometrium on the CSD surface was significantly lower (p = 0.0023) and that of adenomyosis was significantly higher (p = 0.0195) in the CSS group than in the non‐CSS group. The number of CD3‐, CD20‐, CD68‐, and tryptase‐positive cells was significantly lower in the CSS group than in the non‐CSS group; however, the number of CD138‐positive cells was significantly higher in the CSS group (p = 0.0042). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the absence of endometrium, presence of adenomyosis, and chronic inflammation in CSD contributes to secondary infertility due to CSS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8967299/ /pubmed/35386374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12431 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Higuchi, Asuka
Tsuji, Shunichiro
Nobuta, Yuri
Nakamura, Akiko
Katsura, Daisuke
Amano, Tsukuru
Kimura, Fuminori
Tanimura, Satoshi
Murakami, Takashi
Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title_full Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title_fullStr Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title_short Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
title_sort histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35386374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12431
work_keys_str_mv AT higuchiasuka histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT tsujishunichiro histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT nobutayuri histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT nakamuraakiko histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT katsuradaisuke histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT amanotsukuru histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT kimurafuminori histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT tanimurasatoshi histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome
AT murakamitakashi histopathologicalevaluationofcesareanscardefectinwomenwithcesareanscarsyndrome