Cargando…
Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064 |
_version_ | 1784678830487633920 |
---|---|
author | Toyoda, Kazunori Omae, Katsuhiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Uchiyama, Shinichiro Kimura, Kazumi Miwa, Kaori Minematsu, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Keiji Suda, Yoshitaka Toru, Shuta Kitagawa, Kazuo Ihara, Masafumi Koga, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Takenori |
author_facet | Toyoda, Kazunori Omae, Katsuhiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Uchiyama, Shinichiro Kimura, Kazumi Miwa, Kaori Minematsu, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Keiji Suda, Yoshitaka Toru, Shuta Kitagawa, Kazuo Ihara, Masafumi Koga, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Takenori |
author_sort | Toyoda, Kazunori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset. METHODS: In a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: Of 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group). DISCUSSION: Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8967394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89673942022-03-31 Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis Toyoda, Kazunori Omae, Katsuhiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Uchiyama, Shinichiro Kimura, Kazumi Miwa, Kaori Minematsu, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Keiji Suda, Yoshitaka Toru, Shuta Kitagawa, Kazuo Ihara, Masafumi Koga, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Takenori Neurology Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset. METHODS: In a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: Of 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group). DISCUSSION: Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8967394/ /pubmed/35074890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Toyoda, Kazunori Omae, Katsuhiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Uchiyama, Shinichiro Kimura, Kazumi Miwa, Kaori Minematsu, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Keiji Suda, Yoshitaka Toru, Shuta Kitagawa, Kazuo Ihara, Masafumi Koga, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Takenori Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title | Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title_full | Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title_fullStr | Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title_short | Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis |
title_sort | association of timing for starting dual antiplatelet treatment with cilostazol and recurrent stroke: a csps.com trial post hoc analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toyodakazunori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT omaekatsuhiro associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT hoshinoharuhiko associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT uchiyamashinichiro associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT kimurakazumi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT miwakaori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT minematsukazuo associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT yamaguchikeiji associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT sudayoshitaka associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT torushuta associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT kitagawakazuo associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT iharamasafumi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT kogamasatoshi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT yamaguchitakenori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis AT associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis |