Cargando…

Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toyoda, Kazunori, Omae, Katsuhiro, Hoshino, Haruhiko, Uchiyama, Shinichiro, Kimura, Kazumi, Miwa, Kaori, Minematsu, Kazuo, Yamaguchi, Keiji, Suda, Yoshitaka, Toru, Shuta, Kitagawa, Kazuo, Ihara, Masafumi, Koga, Masatoshi, Yamaguchi, Takenori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064
_version_ 1784678830487633920
author Toyoda, Kazunori
Omae, Katsuhiro
Hoshino, Haruhiko
Uchiyama, Shinichiro
Kimura, Kazumi
Miwa, Kaori
Minematsu, Kazuo
Yamaguchi, Keiji
Suda, Yoshitaka
Toru, Shuta
Kitagawa, Kazuo
Ihara, Masafumi
Koga, Masatoshi
Yamaguchi, Takenori
author_facet Toyoda, Kazunori
Omae, Katsuhiro
Hoshino, Haruhiko
Uchiyama, Shinichiro
Kimura, Kazumi
Miwa, Kaori
Minematsu, Kazuo
Yamaguchi, Keiji
Suda, Yoshitaka
Toru, Shuta
Kitagawa, Kazuo
Ihara, Masafumi
Koga, Masatoshi
Yamaguchi, Takenori
author_sort Toyoda, Kazunori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset. METHODS: In a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: Of 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group). DISCUSSION: Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8967394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89673942022-03-31 Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis Toyoda, Kazunori Omae, Katsuhiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Uchiyama, Shinichiro Kimura, Kazumi Miwa, Kaori Minematsu, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Keiji Suda, Yoshitaka Toru, Shuta Kitagawa, Kazuo Ihara, Masafumi Koga, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Takenori Neurology Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term treatment with the combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel showed a lower risk of stroke recurrence compared to aspirin or clopidogrel alone after high-risk noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a randomized trial. We aimed to determine whether the effect of the dual medication compared to monotherapy on risk of recurrent ischemic stroke differs according to timing of starting medication after stroke onset. METHODS: In a subanalysis of the randomized controlled trial, patients between 8 and 180 days after stroke onset were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of cilostazol with aspirin or clopidogrel. They were divided into 3 groups according to the timing of starting trial treatment: between 8 and 14 days after stroke onset (8–14 days group), between 15 and 28 days after stroke onset (15–28 days group), and between 29 and 180 days after stroke onset (29–180 days group). The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes included severe or life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: Of 1,879 patients, 498 belonged to the 8–14 days group, 467 to the 15–28 days group, and 914 to the 29–180 days group. There was a significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the recurrence of ischemic stroke between trial treatment and trichotomized groups. The recurrence of ischemic stroke was less common with dual therapy than with monotherapy in the 15–28 days group (annualized rate 1.5% vs 4.9%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.95]) and the 29–180 days group (1.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; 0.27 [0.12–0.63]) and similarly common in the 8–14 days group (4.5% for both; 1.02 [0.51–2.04]). Severe or life-threatening bleeding occurred similarly between patients on dual therapy and those on monotherapy in any of the trichotomized groups (crude hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.03–1.88] in the 8–14 days group, 1.07 [0.15–7.60] in the 15–28 days group, and 0.76 [0.24–2.39] in the 29–180 days group). DISCUSSION: Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol starting 15–180 days after stroke onset, compared to therapy started 8–14 days after onset, was more effective for secondary stroke prevention than monotherapy without increasing hemorrhage risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01995370; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000012180. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke taking either aspirin or clopidogrel, the addition of cilostazol 15–180 days after stroke onset decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8967394/ /pubmed/35074890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Toyoda, Kazunori
Omae, Katsuhiro
Hoshino, Haruhiko
Uchiyama, Shinichiro
Kimura, Kazumi
Miwa, Kaori
Minematsu, Kazuo
Yamaguchi, Keiji
Suda, Yoshitaka
Toru, Shuta
Kitagawa, Kazuo
Ihara, Masafumi
Koga, Masatoshi
Yamaguchi, Takenori
Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title_full Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title_fullStr Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title_short Association of Timing for Starting Dual Antiplatelet Treatment With Cilostazol and Recurrent Stroke: A CSPS.com Trial Post Hoc Analysis
title_sort association of timing for starting dual antiplatelet treatment with cilostazol and recurrent stroke: a csps.com trial post hoc analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200064
work_keys_str_mv AT toyodakazunori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT omaekatsuhiro associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT hoshinoharuhiko associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT uchiyamashinichiro associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT kimurakazumi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT miwakaori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT minematsukazuo associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT yamaguchikeiji associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT sudayoshitaka associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT torushuta associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT kitagawakazuo associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT iharamasafumi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT kogamasatoshi associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT yamaguchitakenori associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis
AT associationoftimingforstartingdualantiplatelettreatmentwithcilostazolandrecurrentstrokeacspscomtrialposthocanalysis