Cargando…

Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is commonly used to connect emergency department (ED) patients with specialists or resources required for their care. Its infrastructure requires substantial upfront and ongoing investment from an ED or hospital and may be more difficult to implement in lower-resourced setti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zachrison, Kori S., Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E., Boggs, Krislyn M., Li, Sijia, Hayden, Emily M., Camargo, Carlos A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35302445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.9.53014
_version_ 1784678842978271232
author Zachrison, Kori S.
Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Li, Sijia
Hayden, Emily M.
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_facet Zachrison, Kori S.
Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Li, Sijia
Hayden, Emily M.
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_sort Zachrison, Kori S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is commonly used to connect emergency department (ED) patients with specialists or resources required for their care. Its infrastructure requires substantial upfront and ongoing investment from an ED or hospital and may be more difficult to implement in lower-resourced settings. Our aim was to examine for an association between ED payer mix and receipt of telehealth services. METHODS: Using data from the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA 2016 survey, we categorized EDs based on receipt of telehealth services (yes/no). The NEDI-USA data for EDs in New York state was linked with data from state ED datasets (SEDD) and state inpatient data (SID) to determine EDs’ payer mix (percent self-pay or Medicaid). Other ED characteristics of interest were rural location, academic status, and annual ED visit volume. We compared EDs with and without telehealth receipt, and used a logistic regression model to examine the relationship between ED payer mix and telehealth receipt after accounting for other ED characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 162 New York EDs in the SEDD-SID dataset, 160 (99%) were linked to the NEDI-USA dataset and 133 of those responded (83%) to the survey. Telehealth receipt was reported by 48 EDs (36%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 28–44%). Emergency departments with and without telehealth receipt were similar (all P >0.40) with respect to rurality (6% vs 9%, respectively), academic status (13% vs 8%), and annual volume (median 36,728 vs 43,000). By contrast, median percent of Medicaid or self-pay patients was lower in telehealth EDs (36%) vs non-telehealth EDs (45%, P = 0.02). In adjusted analysis, increasing proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients was associated with decreased odds of telehealth receipt (odds ratio 0.87 per 5% increase; 95% CI, 0.77–0.99). Rural location, academic status, and ED volume were not significantly associated with odds of ED telehealth receipt in the adjusted model. CONCLUSION: Among EDs in the state of New York, increasing proportion of self-pay and Medicaid patients was associated with decreased odds of ED telehealth receipt, even after accounting for rural location, academic status, and ED volume. The findings support the need for additional infrastructural investment in EDs serving a greater proportion of disadvantaged patients to ensure equitable access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8967452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89674522022-03-31 Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis Zachrison, Kori S. Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E. Boggs, Krislyn M. Li, Sijia Hayden, Emily M. Camargo, Carlos A. West J Emerg Med Brief Research Report INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is commonly used to connect emergency department (ED) patients with specialists or resources required for their care. Its infrastructure requires substantial upfront and ongoing investment from an ED or hospital and may be more difficult to implement in lower-resourced settings. Our aim was to examine for an association between ED payer mix and receipt of telehealth services. METHODS: Using data from the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA 2016 survey, we categorized EDs based on receipt of telehealth services (yes/no). The NEDI-USA data for EDs in New York state was linked with data from state ED datasets (SEDD) and state inpatient data (SID) to determine EDs’ payer mix (percent self-pay or Medicaid). Other ED characteristics of interest were rural location, academic status, and annual ED visit volume. We compared EDs with and without telehealth receipt, and used a logistic regression model to examine the relationship between ED payer mix and telehealth receipt after accounting for other ED characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 162 New York EDs in the SEDD-SID dataset, 160 (99%) were linked to the NEDI-USA dataset and 133 of those responded (83%) to the survey. Telehealth receipt was reported by 48 EDs (36%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 28–44%). Emergency departments with and without telehealth receipt were similar (all P >0.40) with respect to rurality (6% vs 9%, respectively), academic status (13% vs 8%), and annual volume (median 36,728 vs 43,000). By contrast, median percent of Medicaid or self-pay patients was lower in telehealth EDs (36%) vs non-telehealth EDs (45%, P = 0.02). In adjusted analysis, increasing proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients was associated with decreased odds of telehealth receipt (odds ratio 0.87 per 5% increase; 95% CI, 0.77–0.99). Rural location, academic status, and ED volume were not significantly associated with odds of ED telehealth receipt in the adjusted model. CONCLUSION: Among EDs in the state of New York, increasing proportion of self-pay and Medicaid patients was associated with decreased odds of ED telehealth receipt, even after accounting for rural location, academic status, and ED volume. The findings support the need for additional infrastructural investment in EDs serving a greater proportion of disadvantaged patients to ensure equitable access. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2022-03 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8967452/ /pubmed/35302445 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.9.53014 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Zachrison et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Brief Research Report
Zachrison, Kori S.
Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Li, Sijia
Hayden, Emily M.
Camargo, Carlos A.
Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title_full Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title_fullStr Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title_short Association of Emergency Department Payer Mix with ED Receipt of Telehealth Services: An Observational Analysis
title_sort association of emergency department payer mix with ed receipt of telehealth services: an observational analysis
topic Brief Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35302445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.9.53014
work_keys_str_mv AT zachrisonkoris associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis
AT samuelskalowmargarete associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis
AT boggskrislynm associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis
AT lisijia associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis
AT haydenemilym associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis
AT camargocarlosa associationofemergencydepartmentpayermixwithedreceiptoftelehealthservicesanobservationalanalysis