Cargando…
Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures
U.S. political polarization is at a high point since the Civil War, and is a significant barrier to coordinated national action addressing climate change. To examine where common ground may exist, here we comprehensively review and characterize successes and failures of recent state-level decarboniz...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03335-w |
_version_ | 1784678978343141376 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Renae Burgess, Matthew G. |
author_facet | Marshall, Renae Burgess, Matthew G. |
author_sort | Marshall, Renae |
collection | PubMed |
description | U.S. political polarization is at a high point since the Civil War, and is a significant barrier to coordinated national action addressing climate change. To examine where common ground may exist, here we comprehensively review and characterize successes and failures of recent state-level decarbonization legislation, focusing especially on bipartisanship. We analyze 418 major state-government-enacted bills and 450 failed bills from 2015 to 2020, as well as the political contexts in which they were passed or defeated. We use bivariate analyses and regressions to explore correlations and partial correlations between the policy characteristics and political contexts of bills, and their passage or failure, their bipartisanship, and vote shares they received. Key results include (i) nearly one-third of these state-level decarbonization bills were passed by Republican-controlled governments. (ii) Bipartisan or Republican co-sponsors disproportionately passed financial incentives for renewable energy, and legislation that expands consumer or business choices in context of decarbonization goals; Democrat-only co-sponsors disproportionately passed bills that restricted consumer and business choice, such as mandatory Renewable Energy and Efficiency Portfolio Standards (REEPS) and emissions standards. (iii) Bipartisan bills were disproportionately proposed in “divided” states, did not restrict consumer and business choice, had environmental justice components framed economically, and lacked environmental justice components framed either using academic social-justice jargon or non-neutrally with respect to immutable characteristics such as race. (iv) Bills that expand consumer or business choice were disproportionately enacted. Though climate change is a polarized issue, our results provide tangible insights for future bipartisan successes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-022-03335-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8968113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89681132022-03-31 Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures Marshall, Renae Burgess, Matthew G. Clim Change Article U.S. political polarization is at a high point since the Civil War, and is a significant barrier to coordinated national action addressing climate change. To examine where common ground may exist, here we comprehensively review and characterize successes and failures of recent state-level decarbonization legislation, focusing especially on bipartisanship. We analyze 418 major state-government-enacted bills and 450 failed bills from 2015 to 2020, as well as the political contexts in which they were passed or defeated. We use bivariate analyses and regressions to explore correlations and partial correlations between the policy characteristics and political contexts of bills, and their passage or failure, their bipartisanship, and vote shares they received. Key results include (i) nearly one-third of these state-level decarbonization bills were passed by Republican-controlled governments. (ii) Bipartisan or Republican co-sponsors disproportionately passed financial incentives for renewable energy, and legislation that expands consumer or business choices in context of decarbonization goals; Democrat-only co-sponsors disproportionately passed bills that restricted consumer and business choice, such as mandatory Renewable Energy and Efficiency Portfolio Standards (REEPS) and emissions standards. (iii) Bipartisan bills were disproportionately proposed in “divided” states, did not restrict consumer and business choice, had environmental justice components framed economically, and lacked environmental justice components framed either using academic social-justice jargon or non-neutrally with respect to immutable characteristics such as race. (iv) Bills that expand consumer or business choice were disproportionately enacted. Though climate change is a polarized issue, our results provide tangible insights for future bipartisan successes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-022-03335-w. Springer Netherlands 2022-03-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8968113/ /pubmed/35378820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03335-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, corrected publication 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Marshall, Renae Burgess, Matthew G. Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title | Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title_full | Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title_fullStr | Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title_full_unstemmed | Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title_short | Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
title_sort | advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03335-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallrenae advancingbipartisandecarbonizationpolicieslessonsfromstatelevelsuccessesandfailures AT burgessmatthewg advancingbipartisandecarbonizationpolicieslessonsfromstatelevelsuccessesandfailures |