Cargando…

Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients

PURPOSE: Cones in diabetic patients are at risk due to metabolic and vascular changes. By imaging retinal vessel modeling at high magnification, we reduced its impact on cone distribution measurements. The retinal vessel images and retinal thickness measurements provided information about cone micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsner, Ann E., Walker, Brittany R., Gilbert, Robert N., Parimi, Vamsi, Papay, Joel A., Gast, Thomas J., Burns, Stephen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826643
_version_ 1784678992056418304
author Elsner, Ann E.
Walker, Brittany R.
Gilbert, Robert N.
Parimi, Vamsi
Papay, Joel A.
Gast, Thomas J.
Burns, Stephen A.
author_facet Elsner, Ann E.
Walker, Brittany R.
Gilbert, Robert N.
Parimi, Vamsi
Papay, Joel A.
Gast, Thomas J.
Burns, Stephen A.
author_sort Elsner, Ann E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cones in diabetic patients are at risk due to metabolic and vascular changes. By imaging retinal vessel modeling at high magnification, we reduced its impact on cone distribution measurements. The retinal vessel images and retinal thickness measurements provided information about cone microenvironment. METHODS: We compared cone data in 10 diabetic subjects (28–78 yr) to our published norms from 36 younger and 10 older controls. All subjects were consented and tested in a manner approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board, which adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Custom adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) was used to image cones and retinal microcirculation. We counted cones in a montage of foveal and temporal retina, using four non-contiguous samples within 0.9–7 deg that were selected for best visibility of cones and least pathology. The data were fit with a two parameter exponential model: ln(cone density) = a (*) microns eccentricity + b. These results were compared to retinal thickness measurements from SDOCT. RESULTS: Diabetic cone maps were more variable than in controls and included patches, or unusually bright and dark cones, centrally and more peripherally. Model parameters and total cones within the central 14 deg of the macula differed across diabetic patients. Total cones fell into two groups: similar to normal for 5 vs. less than normal for 2 of 2 younger diabetic subjects and 3 older subjects, low but not outside the confidence limits. Diabetic subjects had all retinal vascular remodeling to varying degrees: microaneurysms; capillary thickening, thinning, or bends; and vessel elongation including capillary loops, tangles, and collaterals. Yet SD-OCT showed that no diabetic subject had a Total Retinal Thickness in any quadrant that fell outside the confidence limits for controls. CONCLUSIONS: AOSLO images pinpointed widespread retinal vascular remodeling in all diabetic eyes, but the SDOCT showed no increased retinal thickness. Cone reflectivity changes were found in all diabetic patients, but significantly low cone density in only some. These results are consistent with early changes to neural, glial, or vascular components of the retinal without significant retinal thickening due to exudation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89681722022-04-01 Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients Elsner, Ann E. Walker, Brittany R. Gilbert, Robert N. Parimi, Vamsi Papay, Joel A. Gast, Thomas J. Burns, Stephen A. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: Cones in diabetic patients are at risk due to metabolic and vascular changes. By imaging retinal vessel modeling at high magnification, we reduced its impact on cone distribution measurements. The retinal vessel images and retinal thickness measurements provided information about cone microenvironment. METHODS: We compared cone data in 10 diabetic subjects (28–78 yr) to our published norms from 36 younger and 10 older controls. All subjects were consented and tested in a manner approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board, which adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Custom adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) was used to image cones and retinal microcirculation. We counted cones in a montage of foveal and temporal retina, using four non-contiguous samples within 0.9–7 deg that were selected for best visibility of cones and least pathology. The data were fit with a two parameter exponential model: ln(cone density) = a (*) microns eccentricity + b. These results were compared to retinal thickness measurements from SDOCT. RESULTS: Diabetic cone maps were more variable than in controls and included patches, or unusually bright and dark cones, centrally and more peripherally. Model parameters and total cones within the central 14 deg of the macula differed across diabetic patients. Total cones fell into two groups: similar to normal for 5 vs. less than normal for 2 of 2 younger diabetic subjects and 3 older subjects, low but not outside the confidence limits. Diabetic subjects had all retinal vascular remodeling to varying degrees: microaneurysms; capillary thickening, thinning, or bends; and vessel elongation including capillary loops, tangles, and collaterals. Yet SD-OCT showed that no diabetic subject had a Total Retinal Thickness in any quadrant that fell outside the confidence limits for controls. CONCLUSIONS: AOSLO images pinpointed widespread retinal vascular remodeling in all diabetic eyes, but the SDOCT showed no increased retinal thickness. Cone reflectivity changes were found in all diabetic patients, but significantly low cone density in only some. These results are consistent with early changes to neural, glial, or vascular components of the retinal without significant retinal thickening due to exudation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8968172/ /pubmed/35372411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826643 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elsner, Walker, Gilbert, Parimi, Papay, Gast and Burns. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Elsner, Ann E.
Walker, Brittany R.
Gilbert, Robert N.
Parimi, Vamsi
Papay, Joel A.
Gast, Thomas J.
Burns, Stephen A.
Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title_full Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title_fullStr Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title_short Cone Photoreceptors in Diabetic Patients
title_sort cone photoreceptors in diabetic patients
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35372411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826643
work_keys_str_mv AT elsneranne conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT walkerbrittanyr conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT gilbertrobertn conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT parimivamsi conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT papayjoela conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT gastthomasj conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients
AT burnsstephena conephotoreceptorsindiabeticpatients