Cargando…

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology

The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of intra oral scanner (IOS) to confirm the applicability of IOS for the recording and analysis of tooth morphology in forensics. The less damaged mandible specimen with many teeth remaining was scanned three times using three types of intraoral s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Eun-Jeong, Woo, Eun-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Anatomists 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34675135
http://dx.doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.136
_version_ 1784679004712730624
author Bae, Eun-Jeong
Woo, Eun-Jin
author_facet Bae, Eun-Jeong
Woo, Eun-Jin
author_sort Bae, Eun-Jeong
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of intra oral scanner (IOS) to confirm the applicability of IOS for the recording and analysis of tooth morphology in forensics. The less damaged mandible specimen with many teeth remaining was scanned three times using three types of intraoral scanners (CS3600, i500, and Trios3). For quantitative comparisons of the scanned images produced by these intraoral scanners, root mean square (RMS) values were computed using a three-dimensional analysis program and a one-way ANOVA was conducted with Tukey HSD (honestly significant difference) as a post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). The repeatability of the full scan data was highest with the i500 (0.14±0.03 mm), and the post-hoc analysis confirmed significant differences between the CS3600 and the i500 outcomes (P-value=0.003). The repeatability of the partial scan data for the teeth in the mandible was highest with the i500 (0.08±0.02 mm), and the post-hoc analysis confirmed significant differences between the CS3600 and the i500 (P-value=0.016). The precision of the full scan data was highest with the i500 (0.16±0.01 mm) but the differences were not statistically significant (P-value=0.091). Meanwhile, the precision of the partial scan data for the teeth in the mandible was highest with the Trios3 (0.22±0.02 mm), but the differences were not statistically significant (P-value=0.762). Considering that the scanning of other areas of the oral cavity in addition to the teeth is important in forensic odontology, the i500 scanner appears to be the most appropriate intraoral scanner for human identification. However, as the scope of oral scanning is generally limited to teeth in the practice of dentistry, additional discussions of how to apply the IOS in forensic odontology are needed. Ultimately, the results here can contribute to the overall discussion of the forensic applicability dental data produced by intraoral scanners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Association of Anatomists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89682272022-04-05 Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology Bae, Eun-Jeong Woo, Eun-Jin Anat Cell Biol Original Article The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of intra oral scanner (IOS) to confirm the applicability of IOS for the recording and analysis of tooth morphology in forensics. The less damaged mandible specimen with many teeth remaining was scanned three times using three types of intraoral scanners (CS3600, i500, and Trios3). For quantitative comparisons of the scanned images produced by these intraoral scanners, root mean square (RMS) values were computed using a three-dimensional analysis program and a one-way ANOVA was conducted with Tukey HSD (honestly significant difference) as a post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). The repeatability of the full scan data was highest with the i500 (0.14±0.03 mm), and the post-hoc analysis confirmed significant differences between the CS3600 and the i500 outcomes (P-value=0.003). The repeatability of the partial scan data for the teeth in the mandible was highest with the i500 (0.08±0.02 mm), and the post-hoc analysis confirmed significant differences between the CS3600 and the i500 (P-value=0.016). The precision of the full scan data was highest with the i500 (0.16±0.01 mm) but the differences were not statistically significant (P-value=0.091). Meanwhile, the precision of the partial scan data for the teeth in the mandible was highest with the Trios3 (0.22±0.02 mm), but the differences were not statistically significant (P-value=0.762). Considering that the scanning of other areas of the oral cavity in addition to the teeth is important in forensic odontology, the i500 scanner appears to be the most appropriate intraoral scanner for human identification. However, as the scope of oral scanning is generally limited to teeth in the practice of dentistry, additional discussions of how to apply the IOS in forensic odontology are needed. Ultimately, the results here can contribute to the overall discussion of the forensic applicability dental data produced by intraoral scanners. Korean Association of Anatomists 2022-03-31 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8968227/ /pubmed/34675135 http://dx.doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.136 Text en Copyright © 2022. Anatomy & Cell Biology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bae, Eun-Jeong
Woo, Eun-Jin
Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title_full Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title_fullStr Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title_short Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
title_sort quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34675135
http://dx.doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.136
work_keys_str_mv AT baeeunjeong quantitativeandqualitativeevaluationontheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersforhumanidentificationinforensicodontology
AT wooeunjin quantitativeandqualitativeevaluationontheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersforhumanidentificationinforensicodontology