Cargando…
Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Wri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702 |
_version_ | 1784679041496776704 |
---|---|
author | Altın, Elif Okur, Nurdem Yalçın, Esra Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı |
author_facet | Altın, Elif Okur, Nurdem Yalçın, Esra Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı |
author_sort | Altın, Elif |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8968421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89684212022-04-01 Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations Altın, Elif Okur, Nurdem Yalçın, Esra Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı Front Psychol Psychology The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8968421/ /pubmed/35369194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702 Text en Copyright © 2022 Altın, Okur, Yalçın, Eraçıkbaş and Aktan-Erciyes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Altın, Elif Okur, Nurdem Yalçın, Esra Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title | Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title_full | Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title_fullStr | Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title_short | Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations |
title_sort | relations between l2 proficiency and l1 lexical property evaluations |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altınelif relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations AT okurnurdem relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations AT yalcınesra relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations AT eracıkbasasudefirdevs relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations AT aktanerciyesaslı relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations |