Cargando…

Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations

The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Wri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altın, Elif, Okur, Nurdem, Yalçın, Esra, Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs, Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702
_version_ 1784679041496776704
author Altın, Elif
Okur, Nurdem
Yalçın, Esra
Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs
Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı
author_facet Altın, Elif
Okur, Nurdem
Yalçın, Esra
Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs
Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı
author_sort Altın, Elif
collection PubMed
description The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89684212022-04-01 Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations Altın, Elif Okur, Nurdem Yalçın, Esra Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı Front Psychol Psychology The present study investigates the relations between L2-English proficiency and L1-Turkish lexical property evaluations. We asked whether L2 proficiency affects lexical properties, including imageability and concreteness ratings of 600 Turkish words selected from the Word Frequency Dictionary of Written Turkish. Seventy-two participants (L1-Turkish - L2-English) provided ratings of concreteness and imageability for 600 words on a 7-point scale. In order to assess their L2 proficiency, we administered Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-IV). We divided categories into two subcategories as high and low for the frequency, concreteness, imageability, and age of acquisition (AoA). The relationship between these subcategories and imageability-concreteness was examined by mixed effects linear regression analyses. We found that L2 proficiency and imageability ratings were positively correlated and specifically, this positive association was evident for low-frequency words and later acquired words. Results are in line with the interaction of bilingual representation under the dual-coding theory which suggests that bilinguals develop an interconnected imaginal representation for two languages as opposed to separate verbal representations. As L2 proficiency increased, the imageability also increased. These findings have implications for literature investigating the relationship between L2 proficiency and linguistic outcomes. Additionally, findings point to the importance of considering the L2 proficiency of participants when lexical tasks that involve cue words or word lists are used. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8968421/ /pubmed/35369194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702 Text en Copyright © 2022 Altın, Okur, Yalçın, Eraçıkbaş and Aktan-Erciyes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Altın, Elif
Okur, Nurdem
Yalçın, Esra
Eraçıkbaş, Asude Firdevs
Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı
Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title_full Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title_fullStr Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title_short Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations
title_sort relations between l2 proficiency and l1 lexical property evaluations
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820702
work_keys_str_mv AT altınelif relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations
AT okurnurdem relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations
AT yalcınesra relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations
AT eracıkbasasudefirdevs relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations
AT aktanerciyesaslı relationsbetweenl2proficiencyandl1lexicalpropertyevaluations