Cargando…

Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

INTRODUCTION: Understanding how adults with hearing loss perceive their abilities when listening in daily communication situations is vital to understanding the functional listening challenges associated with hearing loss. The aim of this study is to explore how adults with hearing loss describe the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Sarah E, Boisvert, Isabelle, McMahon, Catherine, Steyns, Anne, Neal, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051183
_version_ 1784679070118707200
author Hughes, Sarah E
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine
Steyns, Anne
Neal, Katie
author_facet Hughes, Sarah E
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine
Steyns, Anne
Neal, Katie
author_sort Hughes, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Understanding how adults with hearing loss perceive their abilities when listening in daily communication situations is vital to understanding the functional listening challenges associated with hearing loss. The aim of this study is to explore how adults with hearing loss describe their own experiences of the processes, behaviours and components of listening in real-world communication through secondary analysis of published qualitative data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies will be conducted. Studies published in English will be identified through searching Medline, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar databases from inception to November 2021. Handsearching of the included studies’ reference lists will be completed. Included articles will be assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills checklist for qualitative studies. Thematic synthesis will proceed as follows: (1) line-by-line coding to label concepts present in the ‘results’ or ‘findings’ section(s) of the included studies; (2) grouping of similar codes into descriptive themes; (3) development of higher level analytic themes to develop a new interpretation of the included studies’ findings. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of QUALitative (CerQUAL) research approach will be used to establish the degree of confidence that may be placed in synthesis findings and results will be reported alongside the synthesis. Two reviewers will independently undertake screening for eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal, analysis and GRADE-CERQual assessments. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As secondary data analysis of the published literature, ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and other research and clinical meetings. This protocol is registered with PROSPERO prospective database of systematic review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020213389.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8968555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89685552022-04-20 Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis Hughes, Sarah E Boisvert, Isabelle McMahon, Catherine Steyns, Anne Neal, Katie BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Understanding how adults with hearing loss perceive their abilities when listening in daily communication situations is vital to understanding the functional listening challenges associated with hearing loss. The aim of this study is to explore how adults with hearing loss describe their own experiences of the processes, behaviours and components of listening in real-world communication through secondary analysis of published qualitative data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies will be conducted. Studies published in English will be identified through searching Medline, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar databases from inception to November 2021. Handsearching of the included studies’ reference lists will be completed. Included articles will be assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills checklist for qualitative studies. Thematic synthesis will proceed as follows: (1) line-by-line coding to label concepts present in the ‘results’ or ‘findings’ section(s) of the included studies; (2) grouping of similar codes into descriptive themes; (3) development of higher level analytic themes to develop a new interpretation of the included studies’ findings. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of QUALitative (CerQUAL) research approach will be used to establish the degree of confidence that may be placed in synthesis findings and results will be reported alongside the synthesis. Two reviewers will independently undertake screening for eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal, analysis and GRADE-CERQual assessments. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As secondary data analysis of the published literature, ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and other research and clinical meetings. This protocol is registered with PROSPERO prospective database of systematic review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020213389. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8968555/ /pubmed/35354616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051183 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Hughes, Sarah E
Boisvert, Isabelle
McMahon, Catherine
Steyns, Anne
Neal, Katie
Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_short Adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_sort adults’ with hearing loss perceived listening ability in daily communication: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051183
work_keys_str_mv AT hughessarahe adultswithhearinglossperceivedlisteningabilityindailycommunicationprotocolforasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT boisvertisabelle adultswithhearinglossperceivedlisteningabilityindailycommunicationprotocolforasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT mcmahoncatherine adultswithhearinglossperceivedlisteningabilityindailycommunicationprotocolforasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT steynsanne adultswithhearinglossperceivedlisteningabilityindailycommunicationprotocolforasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT nealkatie adultswithhearinglossperceivedlisteningabilityindailycommunicationprotocolforasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesis